9.JG27 DavidRed Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 ok the title says it all.... after about one and a half year, the effective use of WEP is still a mystery to me, and i know that im by far not the only one...in fact i have not yet met one person who knows the answer... of course i got away with it from time to time with using WEP,..but most of the times, after using WEP, even for short periods well below the 5min tolerance, the engine will die at some point, even when the temps were in the healthy ranges...quite often it dies when i already throttled back to 46 @3000 or even 36@2400. temps are ok, and all of a sudden the engine stops, sometimes instantly, sometimes slowly...funny thing is, that all of a sudden, the coolant temperature jumps to max(there is no increase, but its a sudden jump from green to max) it seems, that as soon as you activate WEP, the engine will die at some point no matter what, and no matter how careful you treated it.... please Yo-Yo, can you share some light on it?can you give us instructions on how to use it reliable?is there any reliable way at all?
westr Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 ok the title says it all.... after about one and a half year, the effective use of WEP is still a mystery to me, and i know that im by far not the only one...in fact i have not yet met one person who knows the answer... of course i got away with it from time to time with using WEP,..but most of the times, after using WEP, even for short periods well below the 5min tolerance, the engine will die at some point, even when the temps were in the healthy ranges...quite often it dies when i already throttled back to 46 @3000 or even 36@2400. temps are ok, and all of a sudden the engine stops, sometimes instantly, sometimes slowly...funny thing is, that all of a sudden, the coolant temperature jumps to max(there is no increase, but its a sudden jump from green to max) it seems, that as soon as you activate WEP, the engine will die at some point no matter what, and no matter how careful you treated it.... please Yo-Yo, can you share some light on it?can you give us instructions on how to use it reliable?is there any reliable way at all? Have you tried flying the Mustang with the Radiator fully open (Manually). And keeping your airspeed up, for example don't climb for to long with a lot of Throttle applied. If you enter combat with a 190 for example make sure you enter with good airspeed, try and have a height advantage if not at least be at the same alt. And when he climbs follow him maybe ease of throttle a bit as you get to same height but he will also dive to gain airspeed, that's when you need to get your speed back up so follow him down throttle up don't be afraid to use WEP I tend to use it then and the Mustang really goes downhill fast with WEP and you can get in nice and close. I can use it for short spells but not for to long and you do have to keep glancing down at your temp gauge. And I never use WEP in a sustained climb. :thumbup: I Love DCS Mustang. RYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti 32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV
sobek Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 throttled back to 46 @3000 Maximum continuous is 46@2700. If you kept flying at 46@3000 continuously, it doesn't surprise me in the least that your engine died. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
gavagai Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 Maximum continuous is 46@2700. If you kept flying at 46@3000 continuously, it doesn't surprise me in the least that your engine died. That's just a typing mistake. I am certain that David knows the setting for max continuous. He is a very good Mustang pilot. P-51D | Fw 190D-9 | Bf 109K-4 | Spitfire Mk IX | P-47D | WW2 assets pack | F-86 | Mig-15 | Mig-21 | Mirage 2000C | A-10C II | F-5E | F-16 | F/A-18 | Ka-50 | Combined Arms | FC3 | Nevada | Normandy | Straight of Hormuz | Syria
9.JG27 DavidRed Posted January 25, 2014 Author Posted January 25, 2014 as gavagai said, a typo sorry.... dont want to sound rude, so please dont get this wrong, but i dont need any dogfighting tips...against the AI i dont need no WEP whatsoever and shoot it down with flying only at max continuous without a problem... i would like to have an official answer from Yo-Yo about a reliable way to use WEP and still being safe that the engine will go on...
Merlin-27 Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 (edited) :)Maximum continuous is 46@2700. If you kept flying at 46@3000 continuously, it doesn't surprise me in the least that your engine died. I think the OP is looking for a more detailed explanation as to the simulated effects of WEP within DCS... thus the "dear Yo-Yo" part. We have many many documented tests of different scenarios involving engine settings and the finer details of WEP still remain a mystery. From what I've seen you can fly 61'/3000, despite what any literature suggests, pretty much all day as long as you keep your temps in check. WEP is a different animal altogether... I've detailed situations where I ran WEP at 67"/3000 on a warm day at low altitude for 30 minutes with no problem or indication of an issue and then the instant onset of an engine seizure occurred. I've also heard of people getting results from WEP in low turning fights even though the documentation says it offers no benefit below 5,000 feet. I'm pretty sure the intent of this thread is a little beyond basic engine settings. Correct me if I am wrong, David. EDIT: David beat me to it. Edited January 25, 2014 by Merlin-27 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
sobek Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 (edited) From what I've seen you can fly 61'/3000, despite what any literature suggests, pretty much all day as long as you keep your temps in check. You can't. It will kill your engine, it just takes much, much longer. I've also heard of people getting results from WEP in low turning fights even though the documentation says it offers no benefit below 5,000 feet. This is somewhat strangely described in the manual. What it means is that even without going into WEP, the compressor provides enough MP to go way beyond 61inHg. I'm not sure whether the MP regulator behaviour is wrong or the manual, but there is of course no reason why the engine wouldn't perform better with 67inHg compared to 61inHg even at low altitudes. Edited January 25, 2014 by sobek Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Merlin-27 Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 You can't. It will kill your engine, it just takes much, much longer. haha ok... I guess it's good I don't fly 6 hour sorties. My flight engineer, if I had one, would be very angry right now. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
9.JG27 DavidRed Posted January 25, 2014 Author Posted January 25, 2014 :) I think the OP is looking for a more detailed explanation as to the simulated effects of WEP within DCS... thus the "dear Yo-Yo" part.... ... I'm pretty sure the intent of this thread is a little beyond basic engine settings. Correct me if I am wrong, David. EDIT: David beat me to it. no thats exactly what i want... and btw, with full tanks(all three, no externals though) i can fly at 61@3000 until im out of fuel with no problem as long as the temps are in the ranges... WEP, as Merlin said, has really strange outcomings...sometimes it seems you can fly half an hour with it(done that many times, with an boiling engine) even at low altitudes, and sometimes you will break the engine within seconds(although temps within range)....so i would like to hear official word from the guys who know how its simulated in DCS.
Merlin-27 Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 This is somewhat strangely described in the manual. What it means is that even without going into WEP, the compressor provides enough MP to go way beyond 61inHg. I'm not sure whether the MP regulator behaviour is wrong or the manual, but there is of course no reason why the engine wouldn't perform better with 67inHg compared to 61inHg even at low altitudes. Sorry, I missed this part. And I agree about the "strange descriptions". I guess that is why this thread exists in the first place. Also, I may be misunderstanding what you said... from what I know about the P-51D, "breaking the wire" or WEP does exactly that. It takes advantage of that extra available power. The down side is that it imparts stresses on the Merlin internals beyond their rated limits. AND to contradict the "no appreciable advantage" of using WEP at sea level view you can see a clear performance increase in the flight testing at Wright Field...if that document can be trusted. So who knows :) Flight Test Engineering Branch Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio 15 June 1945 Flight Tests on the North American P-51D Airplane, AAF No. 44-15342 2. Maximum speed at sea level War Emergency Power (3000 RPM and 67") 375 MPH Military Power (3000 RPM and 61") 364 MPH Normal Rated Power (2700 RPM and 46") 323 MPH [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
westr Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 as gavagai said, a typo sorry.... dont want to sound rude, so please dont get this wrong, but i dont need any dogfighting tips...against the AI i dont need no WEP whatsoever and shoot it down with flying only at max continuous without a problem... i would like to have an official answer from Yo-Yo about a reliable way to use WEP and still being safe that the engine will go on... Please don't misunderstand Im not trying to give dogfighting tips I was referring to airspeed. My point was I can use WEP in combat or any form of flying and not blow my engine but if my speed drops to low and I use high throttle RPM or WEP the engine will die. I also was not sure if you have your radiator open? Without my Rad open again my engine can seize quickly. RYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti 32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV
BitMaster Posted January 26, 2014 Posted January 26, 2014 The more stichometric mixture you force into the displacement chamber aka cylinder, the harder the BANG is, just as if you change the CAMS from normal cams to DRAG RACING CAMS. It causes A: Heavy Pre-Ignition if the fuel is of LOW quality and if you cannot alter the "°" degrees of pre-ignition in your coil/blackbox It causes B: bad mixture burn if you don't have enough VOLTS on your coils and spark-plugs It causes C: general overheating that can only be partly compensated by water/methanol/nitromethane mixed into the fuel ( the vaporing of those components cool your internals, maybe enough..maybe not ) and finally: if your bearings, cam-shafts etc. are not fine balanced it will just ROCK YOUR ENGINE APART after so and so many minutes.... What it does in DCS I have no clue but this is what happens in RL if you squeeze in more mixture in than the engine is usually made for. Simple as that. Bit Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Sapphire Nitro+ 7800XT - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus XG27ACG QHD 180Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X
Merlin-27 Posted January 27, 2014 Posted January 27, 2014 The more stichometric mixture you force into the displacement chamber aka cylinder, the harder the BANG is, just as if you change the CAMS from normal cams to DRAG RACING CAMS. It causes A: Heavy Pre-Ignition if the fuel is of LOW quality and if you cannot alter the "°" degrees of pre-ignition in your coil/blackbox It causes B: bad mixture burn if you don't have enough VOLTS on your coils and spark-plugs It causes C: general overheating that can only be partly compensated by water/methanol/nitromethane mixed into the fuel ( the vaporing of those components cool your internals, maybe enough..maybe not ) and finally: if your bearings, cam-shafts etc. are not fine balanced it will just ROCK YOUR ENGINE APART after so and so many minutes.... What it does in DCS I have no clue but this is what happens in RL if you squeeze in more mixture in than the engine is usually made for. Simple as that. Bit Yup. But the standing question for Yo-Yo remains... To what length does DCS simulate the effects of WEP on the Merlin engine. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted January 28, 2014 ED Team Posted January 28, 2014 You can't. It will kill your engine, it just takes much, much longer. This is somewhat strangely described in the manual. What it means is that even without going into WEP, the compressor provides enough MP to go way beyond 61inHg. I'm not sure whether the MP regulator behaviour is wrong or the manual, but there is of course no reason why the engine wouldn't perform better with 67inHg compared to 61inHg even at low altitudes. THe engine will not give better performance HIGHER than 5000 ft! It is an obvious mistake in the manual. The point is that if you have throttle full open all the way, the power will decrease as altitude increases. MP regulator set to cut MP cutting the power at the certain altitude, i.e. the power increases a little from SL th this altitude, then goes along the same curve. The more MP we cut the less is SL power and the higher is the knee or the critical altitude. Thus, increasing the MP cut level we can only increase low level power, though the power at the altitudes higher than the knee remain the same. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted January 28, 2014 ED Team Posted January 28, 2014 no thats exactly what i want... and btw, with full tanks(all three, no externals though) i can fly at 61@3000 until im out of fuel with no problem as long as the temps are in the ranges... WEP, as Merlin said, has really strange outcomings...sometimes it seems you can fly half an hour with it(done that many times, with an boiling engine) even at low altitudes, and sometimes you will break the engine within seconds(although temps within range)....so i would like to hear official word from the guys who know how its simulated in DCS. As in real life the ruler of the DCS world in such matters is His (Her) Majesty Probability. 61" 3000 ruins the engine but you really can not feel it in one mission. As we have resources to be transferred from mission to mission within one campaign it will play a role. 67" 3000, heat excesses (especially at the hard loading engine) will ruin the engine much faster, BUT it all run in a way that if you have 5 minute of WEP you have good chances to get home. If you run the engine longer, harder and overheating it - you have less chances. Nobody can tell you whether you are lucky to get home in the certain sortie, you have to observe a big number of cases or planes to have the final probability of geting home. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
9.JG27 DavidRed Posted January 28, 2014 Author Posted January 28, 2014 thank you very very much Yo-Yo!!!
Merlin-27 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Very good to hear from your Majesty, Yo-yo. :) So the moral of the story: Take care not to push the engine too hard. She may get angry and ruin your day...sooner or later. Anyone see shocking similarities between Yo-yo and Chuck Norris? When Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone he had 3 missed calls from Yo-Yo. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
sobek Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 MP regulator set to cut MP cutting the power at the certain altitude, i.e. the power increases a little from SL th this altitude, then goes along the same curve. The more MP we cut the less is SL power and the higher is the knee or the critical altitude. Thus, increasing the MP cut level we can only increase low level power, though the power at the altitudes higher than the knee remain the same. Are you saying that the critical altitude for 61inHg is 5000ft? Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
billeinstein Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 THe engine will not give better performance HIGHER than 5000 ft! It is an obvious mistake in the manual. The point is that if you have throttle full open all the way, the power will decrease as altitude increases. MP regulator set to cut MP cutting the power at the certain altitude, i.e. the power increases a little from SL th this altitude, then goes along the same curve. The more MP we cut the less is SL power and the higher is the knee or the critical altitude. Thus, increasing the MP cut level we can only increase low level power, though the power at the altitudes higher than the knee remain the same. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
sobek Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 This might be a mixup between versions that did and did not have a MP regulator. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted January 28, 2014 ED Team Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) Ok, we already have one manual with erratic 15:1 glide ratio.... just another one? How can WEP THAT WORKS EXCLUSEVELY from SL to the CRYTICAL ALTITUDE affect engine performance above this altitude? Knowing that FULL THROTTLE operation is above this altitude? By the way, go to wwiiaircraftoerformance please and take a look at the diagrams for climb ratio and maximal speed in comparison with 61-67-75 and more inches. Edited January 28, 2014 by Yo-Yo Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
saburo_cz Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Hello, some posts in this debate confused me. According to this report - Flight Tests on the North American P-51D Airplane, AAF No. 44-15342 (see below) - MP 67 InHg gives more power from AGL to approximatety altitude 13000Ft for 1st supercharge`s gear. I perhaps do not understand some facts, or I missed something. Can someone explain it me in simple words? Thanks. And, I have one question regarding MP regulator. Is MP regulator simulated in game? Two types of the MP regulator were on V-1650-7. Packard type on early and on late engines Simmond`s type. First was able to keep MP within 42-67 InHg up to the critical alt. Second was better and kept MP within 25-67 InHG, plus minus 1 InHg for both. I set 46 InHg and 2600RPM after take off and climbed. MP started to decrease at altitude about 8000Ft. It is not the critical altitude for 1st gear. Temperature was 15° C and ambient pressure was 760mmHg. I thought that MP should be, for instance 45 InHg, from ground to the critical altitude (approx 16000 Ft) without moving throtle lever because of MP regulator which hold preset value. Sorry for my bad English. Thank You. F6F P-51D | P-47D | F4U-1D | Mosquito FB Mk VI | Spitfire | Fw 190D | Fw 190A | Bf 109K | WWII Assets Pack Normandy 2 | The Channel | Sinai | Syria | PG | NTTR | South Atlantic F-4E | F-14A/B | F/A-18 | F-86 | F-16C | A-10C | FC-3 | CA | SC |
billeinstein Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 Ok, we already have one manual with erratic 15:1 glide ratio.... just another one? How can WEP THAT WORKS EXCLUSEVELY from SL to the CRYTICAL ALTITUDE affect engine performance above this altitude? Knowing that FULL THROTTLE operation is above this altitude? By the way, go to wwiiaircraftoerformance please and take a look at the diagrams for climb ratio and maximal speed in comparison with 61-67-75 and more inches. I think this manual (AAF Manual 51-127-5) just wants the pilots to use their engines more gently at low level. It's a training manual, not for test pilots. It is just a recommendation, not means engine will not get more power with WEP below 5000ft. Using WEP is forbidden in training. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted January 31, 2014 ED Team Posted January 31, 2014 Hello, some posts in this debate confused me. According to this report - Flight Tests on the North American P-51D Airplane, AAF No. 44-15342 (see below) - MP 67 InHg gives more power from AGL to approximatety altitude 13000Ft for 1st supercharge`s gear. I perhaps do not understand some facts, or I missed something. Can someone explain it me in simple words? Thanks. And, I have one question regarding MP regulator. Is MP regulator simulated in game? Two types of the MP regulator were on V-1650-7. Packard type on early and on late engines Simmond`s type. First was able to keep MP within 42-67 InHg up to the critical alt. Second was better and kept MP within 25-67 InHG, plus minus 1 InHg for both. I set 46 InHg and 2600RPM after take off and climbed. MP started to decrease at altitude about 8000Ft. It is not the critical altitude for 1st gear. Temperature was 15° C and ambient pressure was 760mmHg. I thought that MP should be, for instance 45 InHg, from ground to the critical altitude (approx 16000 Ft) without moving throtle lever because of MP regulator which hold preset value. Sorry for my bad English. Thank You. It's exactly as R-R type regulator works. If you read the manual you can find this feature. MP regulator in DCS is modelled truly and precisely. By the way. you could read even Developers Notes abot MP where this case (46/2700) is explained in details. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
Merlin-27 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 If you're extra bored or extra ambitious, read this. http://www.enginehistory.org/Piston/Rolls-Royce/R-RmerlinABC/R-RmerlinABC.shtml [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
Recommended Posts