Raptor123 Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 (edited) Why are there no Su-27UB, MiG-29UB and F-15D models in the DCS FC3? There should be trainer jets in a fighter wing or fighter group. Very hope that ED team adds trainer models to DCS by updates, even it is not flyable temporarily. If so, that would be more realistic. Edited January 13, 2016 by Raptor123
Sweep Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 Nah, those (except MiG-29UB...looks cool, but no radar :( ) deserve their own module(s), IMO. I'd love to have an F-15D, imagine what you could do in the back seat...sit and watch, take control when needed, yell at people that can't fly, etc...it'd be so much fun. I know a lot of people that'd rather have an F-15E over any other 2 seat F-15, though... Well, I'm fine with that too :P Lord of Salt
Exorcet Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 I know a lot of people that'd rather have an F-15E over any other 2 seat F-15, though... I'd rather have DCS F-15C over them all. The second seat just eats away at my DPS with that added weight. On the topic though, two seat capability is brand new to DCS and the FC planes are legacy assets. Not to mention ED is already focused on updating them to PFM standard, and possibly ASM down the line. Adding two seaters isn't really in the cards. Best hope might be third party modules. Awaiting: DCS F-15C Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files
flashben Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 (edited) F-15D would also fit nicely in an NTTR environment . Edited January 13, 2016 by flashben
Sweep Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 I'd rather have DCS F-15C over them all. The second seat just eats away at my DPS with that added weight. On the topic though, two seat capability is brand new to DCS and the FC planes are legacy assets. Not to mention ED is already focused on updating them to PFM standard, and possibly ASM down the line. Adding two seaters isn't really in the cards. Best hope might be third party modules. Agreed, an ASM -15C would be awesome. Lord of Salt
pepin1234 Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 The Su-27UB is awesome. Mig-29UB with not radar not that great. With F-15D and Su-27UB is easy teach the new pilots for combat ready. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
SDsc0rch Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 I'd rather have DCS F-15C over them all. ^this^ i7-4790K | Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkI | 16Gb DDR3 | EVGA GTX 980 | TM Warthog | MFG Crosswind | Panasonic TC-58AX800U [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Farlander Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 I think we have enough trainers. Let's not make digital trainer simulator
Sweep Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 ^^Correction: We have enough lead-in jet trainers (or whatever the term is.). I'll fly any modern fast jet available. :D Lord of Salt
BlazexX23Xx Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 I was saying the same thing,if not flyable at least AI.
FSKRipper Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 (edited) ^^Correction: We have enough lead-in jet trainers (or whatever the term is.). I'll fly any modern fast jet available. :D +1 We have currently 3 Trainers at all with maybe more to come. I would be more happy with full dual seat combat aircraft, you can also train a pilot when he acts as RIO in the Tomcat or Strike Eagle. No need for a second seat in FC3-AC with simplified avionics. Edited January 13, 2016 by FSKRipper i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
tovivan Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 Resources should be used elsewhere, IMO. Exactly. Like fixing those blasted R-27s!
Ktulu2 Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 Exactly. Like fixing those blasted R-27s! Or the Super 530s LOL I do DCS videos on youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAs8VxtXRJHZLnKS4mKunnQ?view_as=public
Ultra Posted January 14, 2016 Posted January 14, 2016 Exactly. Like fixing those blasted R-27s! Or the Super 530s LOL Yes and Yes!
tovivan Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 Or the Super 530s LOL They have guidance and succeptibility to ecm/chaff/flare problems too? O.o So, basically a game that is a lot about BVR is bugged for most of the player base, except those flying F15s. Lol, nice.
Ultra Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 They have guidance and succeptibility to ecm/chaff/flare problems too? O.o So, basically a game that is a lot about BVR is bugged for most of the player base, except those flying F15s. Lol, nice. I think people are arguing about guidance or CM effectiveness (yet :D), but the problem is with their drag numbers. Very drag versus the Aim-7 which it is supposed to be comparable.
GGTharos Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 This is not a missile thread. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
NRG-Vampire Posted January 15, 2016 Posted January 15, 2016 F-15D would also fit nicely in an NTTR environment . https://www.facebook.com/eagle.dynamics/photos/pb.441639040340.-2207520000.1399412366./10152895711490341/?type=3&theater
Recommended Posts