Darkbrotherhood7 Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 FWIW; I'm not eliminating the possibility of a -D module in the future. Probably something along the lines of an upgrade package for the A & B. It is, however, a lot of work- and we have a jet lined up for after the F-14 already. Cobra... What are you planning to us? Draken? Gripen? :D:D About the F-14D, all I can say is 1+++. It would be fabulous. Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
WinterH Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 Notagain.jpg Just give us some Viggen screenshots already, we can speculate about Draken (or whatever else) later on while playing with MiG, Viggen, F-14 etc :D. Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V DCS-Dismounts Script
Hummingbird Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 The F-14D also has the DFCS, which I'm not sure wether we will be getting with the B model?
NeilWillis Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 Doubt it, too many people on here worship DCS, one bad thing is said about it and everyone loses their minds. Seriously? I hardly see the response he got here as everyone losing their minds. Ask a silly question, get a silly answer, that's all. And as for worship, I won't even go there! I'm sure Leatherneck will of course immediately scrap all their work so far, and start on a B+ or D model right away. Far be it from us to suggest any different. After all, what do we baying wolves know!!!
okieordie78 Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 I don't understand the want of the D over the B. The B+ will do more than suffice. The most used feature of the D over the B was the TARPS pod. Not biting my nails waiting to get that...
Coyote Duster Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 Seriously? I hardly see the response he got here as everyone losing their minds. Ask a silly question, get a silly answer, that's all. And as for worship, I won't even go there! I'm sure Leatherneck will of course immediately scrap all their work so far, and start on a B+ or D model right away. Far be it from us to suggest any different. After all, what do we baying wolves know!!! I would lol, when people are asking to raise the price so they can pay double of what the cost of a module is, thats going off the deep end lol
Kludo Posted July 8, 2016 Author Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) Dark you are correct my bad, Youd think with as many hours Ive spent around the bird Id of caught that. The F14B UPGRADE did not have the B+! Nice eye! Edited July 8, 2016 by Kludo Poor pensmanship! ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Kludo Posted July 8, 2016 Author Posted July 8, 2016 B and D had tarps pods Okie, I wouldn't waste time modeling it, and the pod needed for targeting for the B and the D is already used in the game. As for anyone who disagrees or doesn't like how I put forth my thoughts, Id ask that you focus on the message not how it was delivered, Shakespeare I am not. I hope you all have a wonderful day :) ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Sweep Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 and we have a jet lined up for after the F-14 already. Cobra you've got a hype train inbound... Lord of Salt
mattebubben Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) ALL ABOARD THE HYPE TRAIN!!! Time to destination = Soon™ Edited July 8, 2016 by mattebubben
Darkbrotherhood7 Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 I'm on it! :D Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Chrinik Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 (edited) B and D had tarps pods Okie, I wouldn't waste time modeling it, and the pod needed for targeting for the B and the D is already used in the game. As for anyone who disagrees or doesn't like how I put forth my thoughts, Id ask that you focus on the message not how it was delivered, Shakespeare I am not. I hope you all have a wonderful day :) The Message was "Why doesn´t Leatherneck or any developer do the plane I want, instead of the planes they ARE doing?" To which the response was "Because they already started work on X and it would be too hard to make Y now, and also classification." I found the Message to be incredibly stupid and ignorant, honestly. You can go and play FSX or whatever, it has all the planes you want, wether they are fully realistic or not, but you can pretend they are. But wondering why a developer doesn´t do "the most modern version of X plane"...well, the reasons have been stated, but why don´t YOU do it instead if it´s that easy? This isn´t even defending the developers or ED, but I honestly think that some people seem to think software developers are wizards that just hit a bunch of keys and stuff magically appears on the screen, the thought amuses me. As for the "cash paying folk"...they will pay cash for the F-14A and B regardless. Even the L39 sold copies, believe it or not. BTW, what DCS module uses the LANTIRN Pod? Edited July 9, 2016 by Chrinik [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] GCI: "Control to SEAD: Enemy SAM site 190 for 30, cleared to engage" Striker: "Copy, say Altitude?" GCI: "....Deck....it´s a SAM site..." Striker: "Oh...." Fighter: "Yeah, those pesky russian build, baloon based SAMs." -Red-Lyfe Best way to troll DCS community, make an F-16A, see how dedicated the fans really are :thumbup:
Kludo Posted July 9, 2016 Author Posted July 9, 2016 The Message was "Why doesn´t Leatherneck or any developer do the plane I want, instead of the planes they ARE doing?" To which the response was "Because they already started work on X and it would be too hard to make Y now, and also classification." I found the Message to be incredibly stupid and ignorant, honestly. You can go and play FSX or whatever, it has all the planes you want, wether they are fully realistic or not, but you can pretend they are. But wondering why a developer doesn´t do "the most modern version of X plane"...well, the reasons have been stated, but why don´t YOU do it instead if it´s that easy? This isn´t even defending the developers or ED, but I honestly think that some people seem to think software developers are wizards that just hit a bunch of keys and stuff magically appears on the screen, the thought amuses me. As for the "cash paying folk"...they will pay cash for the F-14A and B regardless. Even the L39 sold copies, believe it or not. BTW, what DCS module uses the LANTIRN Pod? Thank you for your understanding in what I have said and stated. I appreciate it. You seem very down to earth. Can you friend me on here? ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Tirak Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 It is, however, a lot of work- and we have a jet lined up for after the F-14 already. No, Bad Cobra, Very Bad Cobra. You have 3 balls in the air already, no hyping until you put at least one down.
BlackLion213 Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 No, Bad Cobra, Very Bad Cobra. You have 3 balls in the air already, no hyping until you put at least one down. :megalol: -Nick
Hadwell Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 (edited) OK mostly here's how game development works... (as far as i know) you have your 3D guys, your math guys and your programmer guys.... the 3D guys always get done first because the oooh shinyness part, the part that everyone sees, and asks for the screenshots of, is the easiest, and frankly the most useless part of simulating flight... then there's the math guys, the ones that actually go out and get the real world data needed, and convert it into something the programmers can use then there's the programmers who use the data the math guys collected to make the previously useless 3d model into an aircraft... the 3D modelers have nothing to do like 95% of the time.... so it's obvious they're going to work on other projects at the same time.... Edited July 9, 2016 by Hadwell My youtube channel Remember: the fun is in the fight, not the kill, so say NO! to the AIM-120. System specs:ROG Maximus XI Hero, Intel I9 9900K, 32GB 3200MHz ram, EVGA 1080ti FTW3, Samsung 970 EVO 1TB NVME, 27" Samsung SA350 1080p, 27" BenQ GW2765HT 1440p, ASUS ROG PG278Q 1440p G-SYNC Controls: Saitekt rudder pedals,Virpil MongoosT50 throttle, warBRD base, CM2 stick, TrackIR 5+pro clip, WMR VR headset. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted July 9, 2016 ED Team Posted July 9, 2016 Thread cleaned A reminder for some 1.10 Product feedback and constructive criticism is encouraged when provided in a mature and courteous manner. However, feedback that is abusive, insulting or condescending is not welcome. Additionally, to bring up a particular issue repeatedly after it has already been acknowledged will be considered "trolling" - in such cases a warning will be issued to the author and the post will be removed. http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Recommended Posts