Knock-Knock Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 First of all, Im not trying to start some desperate lobbying attempt, to turn the M2K into some missile donkey, but asking in all seriousness, cause I dont know the reason behind it. Be it technical limitation, design choice/limitation etc., so simply looking to expand my knowledge about it. What ever the planes limitations, its one of the fascinations for me. With all the available pylons, what is the limitation as to what you can hang under them? And how come it cant carry 4x 530's, or 4x Magic's? - Jack of many DCS modules, master of none. - Personal wishlist: F-15A, F-4S Phantom II, JAS 39A Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, F-104 Starfighter, Panavia Tornado IDS. | Windows 11 | i5-12400 | 64Gb DDR4 | RTX 3080 | 2x M.2 | 27" 1440p | Rift CV1 | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS | MFG Crosswind pedals |
PiedDroit Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 First of all, Im not trying to start some desperate lobbying attempt, to turn the M2K into some missile donkey, but asking in all seriousness, cause I dont know the reason behind it. Be it technical limitation, design choice/limitation etc., so simply looking to expand my knowledge about it. What ever the planes limitations, its one of the fascinations for me. With all the available pylons, what is the limitation as to what you can hang under them? And how come it cant carry 4x 530's, or 4x Magic's? Pretty much technical and doctrine reasons. As an interceptor it doesn't need to be a missile truck. Mags and 530Ds are rail launched which prevent them to be used from belly pylons (gas ingestion). Mica missiles can be launched from pylons but no Mica's on the -C. Outer pylons can't carry 530D (too heavy). Only Greek Mirage can carry 4 MAGs (DCS version can do it too AFAIK). There are at least 2 threads on that specific topic unfortunately search is clunky on the phone so I can't link them now.
Knock-Knock Posted July 12, 2016 Author Posted July 12, 2016 Mags and 530Ds are rail launched which prevent them to be used from belly pylons (gas ingestion). Ah, makes sense. And the reason F-15 and F-14 can for example, is because the engine nacelle's are much wider apart? Outer pylons can't carry 530D (too heavy). Is that a G load restriction, cause a rocket pod is heavier than a 530, or? There are at least 2 threads on that specific topic unfortunately search is clunky on the phone so I can't link them now. Aight thx, Ill have a sniff around. - Jack of many DCS modules, master of none. - Personal wishlist: F-15A, F-4S Phantom II, JAS 39A Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, F-104 Starfighter, Panavia Tornado IDS. | Windows 11 | i5-12400 | 64Gb DDR4 | RTX 3080 | 2x M.2 | 27" 1440p | Rift CV1 | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS | MFG Crosswind pedals |
Ovenmit Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 You can carry 4 x magics, I do it often. Unless something has changed in the patch now? Win 10pro x64 | i5 2500 | 16GB RAM | GTX1060 6GB | Logitech G940 | Tir5 + TC [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
zcrazyx Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 I see pictures like this and I wish we could do this.
Rlaxoxo Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 Technically you can .... http://imgur.com/a/AWcyC [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Youtube Reddit
CrashO Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) I see pictures like this and I wish we could do this. Different aircraft. Mirage 2000C entered service in 1983. Mirage 2000-5 in 1997.. :) Mirage 2000-5 carries MICA missiles that weigh about 112kg. Super 530s weigh more than twice that. Edited July 12, 2016 by CrashO
txmtb Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 Ah, makes sense. And the reason F-15 and F-14 can for example, is because the engine nacelle's are much wider apart? Pretty sure, on the F-15 at least, it has ejectors that push the missile away from the fuselage before the rocket ignites. How long the delay is I don't really know. Win 10 64 Pro, MSI Z390 I7-9700K @5ghz Kraken Z63, 32Gb Corsair Dominator, MSI RTX-2070, 1TB NVME 2TB SSD's, TM Warthog, Pro Rudders, OpenTrack w/ IR Clip
Svend_Dellepude Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 Pretty sure, on the F-15 at least, it has ejectors that push the missile away from the fuselage before the rocket ignites. How long the delay is I don't really know. It does indeed have ejectors for the belly stations. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Win10 64, Asus Maximus VIII Formula, i5 6600K, Geforce 980 GTX Ti, 32 GB Ram, Samsung EVO SSD.
Knock-Knock Posted July 12, 2016 Author Posted July 12, 2016 Good stuff, thx guys :thumbup: You can carry 4 x magics, I do it often. Unless something has changed in the patch now? Indeed it can. Just had a look in the loadout in ME. Was just the manual's Loadout configuration (p 105), says it cant - unless I read it wrong. - Jack of many DCS modules, master of none. - Personal wishlist: F-15A, F-4S Phantom II, JAS 39A Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, F-104 Starfighter, Panavia Tornado IDS. | Windows 11 | i5-12400 | 64Gb DDR4 | RTX 3080 | 2x M.2 | 27" 1440p | Rift CV1 | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS | MFG Crosswind pedals |
CrashO Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) Indeed it can. Just had a look in the loadout in ME. Was just the manual's Loadout configuration (p 105), says it cant - unless I read it wrong. It was added a few patches ago. They must have forgotten to put it in the manual. :) Version: 1.5.3 Open Beta Date: 5/13/2016 Added ability to load MagicII on inboard pylons *edit* I just remembered there was a lot of complaining and moaning from people about it. Since the (French) M2000C only supports 2 Magics. However, the Greek M2000EG does support 4 (and has different radar and some other stuff). So people started complaining about this being not "a true M2000C" and not wanting it. And others wanting a full M2000EG. In the end. If someone wants to use 4 magics, use 4 magics. If they want a realistic M2000C loadout, use 2 Magics :) So this might be why it is not in the manual. (I believe it is possible in the M2000C, just never used by anyone except Greece, which has the M2000EG) Edited July 12, 2016 by CrashO
sedenion Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 So people started complaining about this being not "a true M2000C" and not wanting it. Everybody know that when a module allow any "unrealistic" option, the module becomes little more a "game", and a "game", it's a shame, puah, argh, <vomit> :D
Zeus67 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 It was added a few patches ago. They must have forgotten to put it in the manual. :) *edit* I just remembered there was a lot of complaining and moaning from people about it. Since the (French) M2000C only supports 2 Magics. However, the Greek M2000EG does support 4 (and has different radar and some other stuff). So people started complaining about this being not "a true M2000C" and not wanting it. And others wanting a full M2000EG. In the end. If someone wants to use 4 magics, use 4 magics. If they want a realistic M2000C loadout, use 2 Magics :) So this might be why it is not in the manual. (I believe it is possible in the M2000C, just never used by anyone except Greece, which has the M2000EG) The ability to carry 4 Magics has always been there. It is just that the French Air Force never felt the need to do that with the C, unlike the Greeks. It probably has to do with money. I'm sure that a Magic II is cheaper than a Super 530D and Greece wanted fighters while France required bomber interceptors. In the end France decided that it wanted fighters too and upgraded the C to the 5 and added more missiles. Although this time they used MICAs. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."
jojo Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Greece has a specific context, defending some island airspace Vs Turkey contest, scrambled fighters are quickly at the merge. So maybe full Magic load is more relevant to them. Moreover Super 530D is a kind of mid life update to Mirage 2000 EG, it was not provided on Mirage delivery...for whatever reason. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi
Manuel_108 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 If you guys want to shoot 20 missiles in one go, I recommend ED's F/A-18C. Takes SPAMRAAM to a whole new level.
PiedDroit Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 If you guys want to shoot 20 missiles in one go, I recommend ED's F/A-18C. Takes SPAMRAAM to a whole new level.Nice trolling attempt :mad: Please read the thread before posting, it ain't all in the title.
sedenion Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Nice trolling attempt :mad: Please read the thread before posting, it ain't all in the title. I though that was just some humor... but i don't understand the reference to F/A-18. The module does not exists (or in alpha test ?), he can carry only 6 AMRAM while F-15 can carry 8 AMRAM.
jojo Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 I though that was just some humor... but i don't understand the reference to F/A-18. The module does not exists (or in alpha test ?), he can carry only 6 AMRAM while F-15 can carry 8 AMRAM. With twin-rails launcher it can go up to ten. For sure it will be popular in MP :megalol: Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi
TheJay15 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 With that many AR missiles it isn't even fun anymore.
Zeus67 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 With twin-rails launcher it can go up to ten. For sure it will be popular in MP :megalol: That's definetively SPAMRAAM. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."
PiedDroit Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 I though that was just some humor... but i don't understand the reference to F/A-18. The module does not exists (or in alpha test ?), he can carry only 6 AMRAM while F-15 can carry 8 AMRAM. I hoped it wouldn't derail. But it dit. I guess it's inevitable, some topics are just too tempting :doh:
Voodooflies Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 With twin-rails launcher it can go up to ten. For sure it will be popular in MP :megalol: Mother of god... :lol: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Darkbrotherhood7 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 The F-15SA can carry 18x A2A missiles, and 3x external bags! lol Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Zeus67 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Pretty soon we will reach this stage: I've always loved the Macross VF-1S Valkyrie and always wonder how it would be to pilot one. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."
mattebubben Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Pretty soon we will reach this stage: I've always loved the Macross VF-1S Valkyrie and always wonder how it would be to pilot one. Next RAZBAM Module?
Recommended Posts