R-27EA (AE) on Su-27

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

Take a close look at the RED missile just behind the white R-73. Look at the radome shape of that missile.

 

 

Anybody speaks Polish here? What is this article about?

[Pilotasso]

We have the same kind of phisical differences between live AMRAAMs and training/dummy rounds. THe color of that missile clearly indicates this.

[EvilBivol-1]

I wonder what missiles are under thier wings? Any pictures?

Good old R-27s:

[Force_Feedback]

Argh, REAL R-27s have proximity fuses, a yellowish radome, and smooth control surface connections with a black circle where the actuators are. Until we see those things, and some strange radome shape, then it's a R-27EA

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

Good old R-27s:

Radomes are covered on the first picture? Those missiles could be EA's or ER's, we don't know.

[Geier]

=4c= Hajduk Veljko

Ok, I've asked not to scan all your book without reserving any copyrights.

As I know if you make some quotes with "©" marking and name the authors -in this very case you actions won't contradict IP law:)

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

=4c= Hajduk Veljko

Ok, I've asked not to scan all your book without reserving any copyrights.

As I know if you make some quotes with "©" marking and name the authors -in this very case you actions won't contradict IP law:)

Page 2 of the book:

 

"All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photo-copied, recorded or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher"

 

Book is really affordable. Every military aviation enthusiast should have it. I will not scan any part of the book ever.

 

What do you think about a picture in post #473?

[Groove]

Anybody speaks Polish here? What is this article about?

 

I speak polish and the article is about the Su-35, but nothing about the Missile you are debating here.

[Geier]

Page 2 of the book:

 

"All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photo-copied, recorded or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher"

 

Book is really affordable. Every military aviation enthusiast should have it. I will not scan any part of the book ever.

Ok)

What do you think about a picture in post #473?

Yep I see the shape of this missile is differ from original R27R(ER) ones. But I suppose it can be just a model not a combat AA missile with the certain characteristics:huh:

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

This is interesting picture ...

 

[Rhino4]

:doh: :wallbash:

[Mustang]

Oh noes......

 

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

:music_whistling:

[GGTharos]

Oh look, a flanker loaded out with mock-ups :)

[RedTiger]

Oh look, a flanker loaded out with mock-ups :)

 

And, judging from the paint scheme and apparent age of the photo, the one and only one Su-37...loaded with mock-ups.

[mvsgas]

Not this again man, let it go. Let it dies in peace. No one ever agrees with you... sorry you do your thing man, and hold to that hope with both hands.

[Groove]

This picture is off-topic Mugatu ;)

[nscode]

At this point, Hajduk's EA saga is just like the UFOs. After so many talk about it, and so much evidence, no one is going to believe it even when some real proof does come up, unless it comes and hits you in the face :D

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

No one ever agrees with you...

What does this comment have to do with the picture of Flanker with mockup R-27EA missiles?

[mvsgas]

Nothing, It has nothing to do with it, sorry

 

Edited:

Actually, I owe you and explanation I guess. I was going to say that most people, not all, disagree with your idea about the R-27EA, but I have no idea about the missile and this thread has being going on for to long for me to read the whole story. That is all, not arguing any of your points nor saying anything bad about it, just that this thread ( and most threads about missiles ) keeps creeping back, but I guess that is the whole point about any aviation forum, to talk about our ideas on or favorite aviation topics. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

You are good man Mvsgas. I agree with your saying.

 

Regards,

[Red Hammer]

Here are what I can find. R-27EA's radar seeker.

[Red Hammer]

Any way I found in here. http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://sistemadearmas.sites.uol.com.br/aam/aa10tipos.jpg&imgrefurl=http://sistemadearmas.sites.uol.com.br/aam/aa10.html&h=420&w=516&sz=32&hl=en&start=14&um=1&tbnid=fD8tGkBUiGaYFM:&tbnh=107&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3DChinese%2BR-27EA%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN And I can't really read since it is neither in Chinese nor English.

untitled.bmp

1.bmp

[4c Hajduk Veljko]

Baaad news for EA missile skeptics!!!! Goood news for EA missile enthusiasts (ME)!!

 

I've just received Yefims Su-27 book from his "Famous Russian Aircraft" series. This is my second book from the series, and MiG-31 book is on its way … You can get this book from Amazon for 40 bucks. I glanced through it, and whooooaaaaa! There are EA missiles everywhere! Yeah I know they are all inert, and EA missile does not exist, and Yefim is always wrong .... However, (many) picture(s) is a thousand words.

 

In my view, it is really a good strategy to have your opponent believe you don't have ARH missile that can hit you that far away ...

 

The book has some 591 pages. Very nice close up color pictures, cockpits, weapons, picture of a Moskit missile launch ... True Flanker encyclopedia. I recommended it to everybody, specially those who still has doubts :thumbup: about EA missile.

 

[Groove]

480 post and still goin!