shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) i dont know where to start from ill make it as short as i can and sorry for typos 1.SA-3 search radar (the P-19) doesnt indicate as "sa-3" on the RWR in real life if it indicates at all its a general search radar and can be used without any sam (it scans in the UHF freq too low for most of the moden RWR and jammers but can be jammed and tracked) 2.SA-3 can directly hit you when its not even semi active even if you pull 9 g's or it will just miss and go without exloding from the radio fuze it has ED PLEASE FIX (relevent only if the height is above 20 meters if not a K3 command from the system will explode it) 3.it has max range of 25 km (can bearly do 30 will never happen) but it wont shoot at you from even 5km sometimes and it doesnt matter how low i am because it was designed to engage in those heights 4.the ZSU-23 with his j band radar doesnt show when he search for you in the RWR he just magicly locks you and the jamming does nothing to him but in real life this system would fail from the smallest jammer because it was designed without a thought about it (maybe later versions fixed it but not the original one for sure) 5.the SA-6 doesnt get his own EW radar? he just going to use his own tracking radar to locate you? it will take him some times to search in any azimuth and elevation together to actually fund something 6.(im not sure about it) there is no way to noise jam a search radar? (atleast in the A10C) if i want to use the jammer but nothing locks me i cant? doesnt seem right and im not talking about VHF/UHF EW's even the ZSU-23 that im sure the jammer can handle with 7.missiles can follow after the target but will go into the water. do you think they didnt thought about it? the missiles are not stupid enough and i mean in every sam that dcs has to offer even the SA-3 had a setting against it because in the six days war the israelis found about it and used it against the sams (SA-2's not 3's) 8.jammers even do something to those sams? doesnt feel like it Edited September 23, 2017 by shab249 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconPlot16 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 i feel something about jamming in a10c its working i bet at least for short range radars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Share Posted September 23, 2017 i feel something about jamming in a10c its working i bet at least for short range radars maybe it works but not in a simulator grade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 5.the SA-6 doesnt get his own searc radar? he just going to use his own tracking radar to locate you? it will take him some times to search in any azimuth and elevation together to actually fund something The 2S91 make Search / Tracking / illuminations, all on the same platform. Additional radars as P-12/P-15/P-40 search radars, but a P-40 long track can be added to the battery as search radar to track High altitude targets. More news to the front My Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core 3.60 GHz / Crosshair VI Hero / Corsair H115i / 48 GB DDR4 RAM Vergance RGB Pro / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb / SSD 2Tb/2x1Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR / Track Ir V / Logitech G633 DCS: Roadmap (unofficial): https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893 DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4076891#post4076891 Silver_Dragon Youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Share Posted September 23, 2017 The 2S91 make Search / Tracking / illuminations, all on the same platform. Additional radars as P-12/P-15/P-40 search radars, but a P-40 long track can be added to the battery as search radar to track High altitude targets. it can serch but i meant EW radar like the P-40 will make it much more easy and effective than using the 2S91 for that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shab249 Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vatikus Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 SA3 is very badly simulated in DCS... you can add max. engagement altitude to the bug list... as of now, it will not engage target above 6km alt, while the missile should reach 3x that limit in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZHeN Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) by the way, SA-6 is not engaging targets in multiplayer in current 1.5.7 release ... reported already ? also experiencing issues with HAWK system Edited September 27, 2017 by ZHeN [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reflected Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Couldn't agree more with point 2. 9 Gs, chaffing like crazy, and the SA-3 still hits 90% of the times. Ridiculous. Facebook Instagram YouTube Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feefifofum Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 @ZHeN neither is the SA-3, while you're on the subject. Not sure if it's been reported. Buk and Grumble seem ok. MY MISSIONS AND CAMPAIGNS: THE GEORGIAN WAR - OFFICIAL F-15C DLC Operation Hydra - Large scale MP CO-OP in the Persian Gulf The New Soviet Republic - Ongoing MP CO-OP Campaign in the Caucasus region Operation Wax Wings - Large scale MP CO-OP in the Caucasus region Operation Lead Sky - Large scale MP CO-OP in the Persian Gulf Operation Skyhook - Large scale MP CO-OP in the Persian Gulf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shab249 Posted September 30, 2017 Author Share Posted September 30, 2017 Couldn't agree more with point 2. 9 Gs, chaffing like crazy, and the SA-3 still hits 90% of the times. Ridiculous. yea and its from the 60's without a semi active reciever on it... lets say a CEP or few tens of meters and even hundred for a fighting target but in DCS it has CEP of 5 meters or less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shab249 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Share Posted October 4, 2017 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts