shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) . Edited November 22, 2023 by shab249
FalconPlot16 Posted September 23, 2017 Posted September 23, 2017 i feel something about jamming in a10c its working i bet at least for short range radars
shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Posted September 23, 2017 i feel something about jamming in a10c its working i bet at least for short range radars maybe it works but not in a simulator grade
Silver_Dragon Posted September 23, 2017 Posted September 23, 2017 5.the SA-6 doesnt get his own searc radar? he just going to use his own tracking radar to locate you? it will take him some times to search in any azimuth and elevation together to actually fund something The 2S91 make Search / Tracking / illuminations, all on the same platform. Additional radars as P-12/P-15/P-40 search radars, but a P-40 long track can be added to the battery as search radar to track High altitude targets. For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
shab249 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Posted September 23, 2017 The 2S91 make Search / Tracking / illuminations, all on the same platform. Additional radars as P-12/P-15/P-40 search radars, but a P-40 long track can be added to the battery as search radar to track High altitude targets. it can serch but i meant EW radar like the P-40 will make it much more easy and effective than using the 2S91 for that
Vatikus Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 SA3 is very badly simulated in DCS... you can add max. engagement altitude to the bug list... as of now, it will not engage target above 6km alt, while the missile should reach 3x that limit in real life.
ZHeN Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) by the way, SA-6 is not engaging targets in multiplayer in current 1.5.7 release ... reported already ? also experiencing issues with HAWK system Edited September 27, 2017 by ZHeN [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Reflected Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 Couldn't agree more with point 2. 9 Gs, chaffing like crazy, and the SA-3 still hits 90% of the times. Ridiculous. Facebook Instagram YouTube Discord
feefifofum Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 @ZHeN neither is the SA-3, while you're on the subject. Not sure if it's been reported. Buk and Grumble seem ok. THE GEORGIAN WAR - OFFICIAL F-15C DLC
shab249 Posted September 30, 2017 Author Posted September 30, 2017 Couldn't agree more with point 2. 9 Gs, chaffing like crazy, and the SA-3 still hits 90% of the times. Ridiculous. yea and its from the 60's without a semi active reciever on it... lets say a CEP or few tens of meters and even hundred for a fighting target but in DCS it has CEP of 5 meters or less
Recommended Posts