Jump to content

RAZBAM -- 1955-65 assets pack (planned)


Recommended Posts

Posted
Yak-38 combat value is close to L-39C(Not even ZA). One of the worst military aircraft ever created in history.

 

I was thinking the same, until I released this aircraft was a disembark support task only, in a soviet tactic only. Then was really useful in this case.

 

About what said Silver Dragon that sound totally BS. This aircraft is a museum piece and a 3rd generation aircraft. Will be a good module anyways

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again.

Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157.

ППС  АВТ 100 60 36  Ф <  |  >  !  ПД  К

i5-10600k/32GB 3600/SSD NVME/4070ti/2560x1440'32/VPC T-50 VPC T-50CM3 throttle Saitek combat rudder

Posted
A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again.

Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157.

 

I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! :megalol:

 

And I totally agree that Su-7 or Su-17/22 would be a much better/more desirable module.

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

Posted
I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! :megalol:

 

Argeed.

+ ZB-500 napalm tanks

+ engine stall when you fire GSh-23

mmm sounds really cool.

 

h-GPcTogFRI.jpg

  • Like 1
Спойлер

Wishlist: MiG-31BM, An-72P, YaK-38M, A-5 Vigilante, Textron Scorpion, YaK-3, He-162

 

Posted
Argeed.

+ ZB-500 napalm tanks

+ engine stall when you fire GSh-23

mmm sounds really cool.

 

h-GPcTogFRI.jpg

 

Maybe someone can make an auto eject mod for the L39, exceed so much AOA and bang! :megalol:

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

Posted
This made me do some research. It ejected you slightly left to avoid the bridge!

 

LOFL. Good human engineering....

 

It does make me want to research if one can land a l39 on something like the tarawa.

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

  • 2 years later...
  • 4 months later...
Posted

The images in post #2 aren't available anymore. But my guess, a 55-65 asset pack, aircraft wise would be ALOT of work. E.g. it would include (excluding current projected modules for that era, helicopters and trainers):

USAF: F-84, -94, -100, -101, -102, -104, -105, -106, Skyraider, Neptune, EC-121, P-3

USN: F-2H, -3H, -9F, -11F, A-3, F-4D Skyray, A-4 Skyhawk

French air force: Ouragan, Mystère I, IV, SMB2, Vautour, Fouga Magister, Mirage IVP

French Navy : Étendard IV, Br .1050 Alizé

RAF: Meteor, Vampire, Venom, Hunter, Attacker, Javelin, Canberra, Lightning,  Shackleton, Victor, Vulcan, Valiant, Swift, 

RN: Sea Vixen, Buccaneer, Scimitar, Sea Venom, Sea Hawk, Gannet

Soviet air force: Su-7, -9,  MiG-21 F13, Yak-28, Tu-16, -126, Il-20

 

Compromises would have to be made...

 

  • Like 2

Wishlist: Tornado ADV/IDS, Blackburn Buccaneer, Super Mystère B2, Saab J 35 Draken,

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/17/2019 at 1:52 PM, Harlikwin said:

 

I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! :megalol:

 

And I totally agree that Su-7 or Su-17/22 would be a much better/more desirable module.

Turn you into jester 

Posted
On 10/17/2019 at 4:07 AM, Кош said:

A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again.

Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157.

The su-7 and F-105 would be a great module pairing 

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...