Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So I have been playing the dynamic campaign and its seems to me that when I designate points in the F10 map and use those for IP and ST they are off by a pretty big margin enough where I and not writhin a close vicinity of the Target. I would say more than 2 miles off.

 

I use jester not a human RIO and don’t set foot in jesters place.

 

Is this me doing something. Or missing something?

Edited by IronMike
Posted

I tested it over the weekend in Normandy as well. I did go fine to jester and plotted waypoints via user point so in f10. ST was Ruen and the ins takes me nearly 5nm north of the city. This amount of error cannot be right. I have saved heeding alignment on for the mission.

 

Any have any kind of input?

Posted
Is this me doing something. Or missing something?

 

Any have any kind of input?

Please post a track, AFAIK a lot will depend on how aggressive you are manoeuvring and the time spent in the air.

i9 9900K @4.8GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 11 Pro x64, Odyssey G93SC 5120X1440

Posted

35 mins airborne just about. With some moderate maneuvering.

 

With that said does jester automatically do tacan fixes and such to update the ins?

Posted

Maneuvering doesn't really make a difference, but time airborne does. The longer you fly, the bigger your drift gets. Unfortunately Jester does not yet have the ability to do nav fixeys to update the INS. Only a human RIO can do so atm.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted

Also it seems the map points jester plugs in from the f10 seem to be more off than pre mission loaded waypoints. Anyone else notice this?

Posted
Also it seems the map points jester plugs in from the f10 seem to be more off than pre mission loaded waypoints. Anyone else notice this?

 

They are not off. You are experiencing INS drift.

Strike

USLANTCOM.com

stepped_with_391_new_small.png

i7-9700K OC 5GHz| MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON | 32GB DDR4 3200 | GTX 3090 | Samsung SSD | HP Reverb G2 | VIRPIL Alpha | VIRPIL Blackhawk | HOTAS Warthog

 

Posted
They are not off. You are experiencing INS drift.

 

Yup. INS drift was/is a very real issue in combat aircraft. Gotta know where you are to drop the fancy bombs right.

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

Posted

220 mi flight to Target in Iran and ins is off 12nm is that a realistic drift? I am on autopilot keeping it level and steady for the near 40min flight inbound.

Posted
220 mi flight to Target in Iran and ins is off 12nm is that a realistic drift? I am on autopilot keeping it level and steady for the near 40min flight inbound.

Doesn't sound too unrealistic. I've read a story about A-10As (so not GPS equipped) that deployed from Spain to Saudi Arabia during Desert Shield and their INS drifted so far off that they couldn't even find their airfield at all and had to contact ATC to help them. Of course, that distance is a bit more than 220nm, but the drift must have been bigger too in order to not be able to even find an entire airfield.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted

Ok cold start Persian gulf have jester do a stored heading Alingment. Take off head towards waypoint I had him plug in from map it’s 80nm out. Fly directly too strait and level. I arrived with ins 5nm off.

 

Will it drift that badly that quick. Less than 20 mins in air.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...