Wish List

[Demongornot]

FC3 and Combined Arms wish list

 

Just for people say wish list for FC3 and Combined Arms only, not for Flying Legend, next aircraft or actual.

 

My wish :

New flyable aircraft in FC3, if the next DCS aircraft its the Hornet : F-15E and F-16, if its the Eagle : F-18 and F-16 and if its the F-16 : F-15E and F-18 flyable in FC3, actually USA don't have multirole in Flaming Cliff.

More than always US and Russian aircraft !

UK, French, Japaneses, Chinese or any other.

Flyable Mirage 2000, Etandard, Jaguar*, Harrier or any other...

 

Helicopter flyable with complexity/realism close to the level of the SU-25T

AH-1, AH-64, MI-28, MI-24, EC665 Tigre or other

 

Clickable cockpit and a little more avionic and improved flying model for actual aircraft for balance difficulty in multiplayer with BS and A10C cause if the aircraft are easy to pilot in FC3 that will be bad for people in BS and A10C, same for P51D and the futur aircraft with multiplayer compatibility.

 

Realistic ground vehicle, tank or anti aircraft AAA or SAM like : SA-8 gecko, 9K330 Tor or for softer : Strela or Tunguska and US equivalent.

M1 Abram or T-80/90 ! can be nice for combined arms than only JTAC possibility.

 

New AI unit like vehicle, boat or civil vehicle, aircraft and other !

Better AI : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81295 with more tactic, realistic, avoid useless collision and really more improved for ground engaging and other...

 

Improved multiplayer who not always be disconnected, bad ping (with good connection for host and player) and without problem of player aircraft position who always move and finally kill us by virtual collision when we try formation flight and other MP problems...

 

Ground crew with nice animation and object like : GPU with cable we will be connected with nice animation to the aircraft, fuel tank with animation of pipe connection, animation for loading weapon when rearming, fire truck coming and fire water when we crash on the runway or on the side with real consequence for fire and electrical system.

Cable and net at the end of the runway (and in carrier too) for emergency landing and more general interaction...

 

Better ATC with real navigation, improved ground guidance for parking area, possibility to take off with wingman or group (see my first link for AI) and if possible mission control center like in real.

 

Pilot body with nice animation and custom mission data/checklist and other on the legs

New explosion effect, vapor on wings, contrail corrected (who not start inside the reactor) and other visual effect

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xywrekEIJIg for example

 

See vibration in the cockpit when we pull hard the aircraft or when firing gun (with effect on instrument/avionic like in real)

 

And nice thing : turbulence when we cross another aircraft trajectory who can (like in real) cause crash for light aircraft and helicopter or loose of control.

 

Nice to have : graphic optimization for stop to lagging for...nothing... with the best actual graphic card and Collisions with trees and we can do for small configuration : show less AND 2D tree for show forest area and finally have collision with forest area and not collision with tree itself, perfect for multiplayer synchronization.

 

Better replay (sometime we see big difference like aircraft shot down during mission who are not during replay or worst our aircraft shot down during replay and finally its never happen, or aircraft crash on grass during landing or finally never take off cause it will out of taxyway and a lot of other problems.

More options like possibility to rewind (if we miss important thing we need to take 5 minutes for restart track and if its at the end of the track its the worst)

 

Dynamic battlefield for dedicated server : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=84001 and same for singleplayer (dynamic campaign)

Improved options and possibility during game http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=82457

 

3D editor/library.

 

Its my and a reasonable wishlist, i know all this things can't be, but one or several can be nice !

And you people ? your wishlist ?

 

Edit : Thanks Joey45 @Admin why turn my threat into a simple post ? we don't have any wishlist thread only dedicated to FC3 and Combined Arms...My wish will be useless here and no one will have the possibility to expose wish only for FC3 and combined arms...

Edited February 21, 2012 by Demongornot

[ploegering]

If your wishes will come true, Demongornot, i would say YES to this question :D

[joey45]

You spelt Jaguar wrong..

But for the record..

 

1) improved FM for player controled AC - maybe for the Eagle or the A-10a

2) IF they (ED) are alowed then another flayable. Maybe a Multi-role US or a European AC *cough*Mirage*cough*

3) Added slots for extra AC from modders - this would have to be added to DCS tittles aswel though

4) some sort of VOIP would be nice

5) ED would have to justify FC3, not another port into DCS.

6) 3D pits would be nice but I doubt they have the manpower/resouces to do it..

Edited February 21, 2012 by joey45

[Demongornot]

If your wishes will come true, Demongornot, i would say YES to this question :D

 

I agree and anyways I have already buy LOMAC+FC+FC2+BS+A10C+BS2 and when it will coming FC3, P51D and Combined Arms (i have buy the Beta version of A10C i don't will need to buy the Nevada) and maybe we will have other thing to buy

 

So finally its already close to 500 for me, mainly if we considerate that i have buy the Hotas Warthog for DCS A10C only and my computer are mainly buy for simulation, its why i always try to obtain better sim, that hurt me to have buy a computer for life my passion and finally life it badly cause all sim are bad and know that we can have not perfect but really better than that...

 

And if the sim will be nice and really merit to be buy at 500 cause it include nice thing and not stupid and missing thing like today i will maybe buy it for 500, but if the sim will one day become better that was not for today due to work quantity that ED have with FC3 combined Arms, Nevada and Next aircraft and after release in, patch it, maybe after or when we will have SDK we will get better sim, the aircraft itself of DCS are perfect but the rest its poor, nothing are correct, baddest AI i have ever see, poor graphic rending (except for vehicle but only for 3D model) no other possibility than short mission without any realism and a lot of bug...We are really far of the 500$ simulator, and if my wish come true then DCS will maybe merit the actual price, but nothing more...Cause ED can do REALLY MORE and BETTER than that...

 

And if one day i find a simulator with descent graphic and realism/possibility and other who merit to be pay 500, i will build a cockpit and buy a dedicated computer and be crazy : use scalar wave emitter technology and simulate G effect :megalol:

 

I think my wishlist are really modest and its exactly what what we must have and we don't have to ask that :mad:

 

But we never will obtain it (except when we will have a good SDK) cause a lot of people don't understand that my wishlist (like graphic) are for the good of all and not only for me, when this people try to discredit me them finally punish themselves :doh::megalol:

 

I hope one day we will see a simulator who will merit to be buy 500$/€

But actually for what it is, DCS don't merit the actual price and never will merit to be buy 500 even if my wishlist come true...

Edited March 13, 2012 by Demongornot

[R-73_Archer]

 

Being able to see your hands actually pulling the ejection handle and able to move your camera when in First Person ejection view (F1 while/after ejection) (0:32 onward) is surely a nice thing...

Edited February 21, 2012 by R-73_Archer

[Jona33]

 

Being able to see your hands actually pulling the ejection handle and able to move your camera when in First Person ejection view (F1 while/after ejection) (0:32 onward) is surely a nice thing...

 

You can move your head after ejection, ALT+F2 while in F1 view. I would like to see a better landing in your chute though. The BS1.02 one was great, will never know why they changed that.

[Demongornot]

You can move your head after ejection, ALT+F2 while in F1 view. I would like to see a better landing in your chute though. The BS1.02 one was great, will never know why they changed that.

 

Move head after ejection don't make nice pilot animation in cockpit and during ejection, but we will never get it badly, Seven G have a nice pilot with really impressive animation of the head who look realistic, the pilot in DCS when we moving on the ground are absolutely horrible, we can't run, we walk weirdly and we can do Shuffle Dance without problems...

ED don't care about visual rending and animation, and finally only the plane itself are realist, the rest are unrealistic and horrible, or missing...

Only pilot animation that we can get if only we meet it again with EDGE will be a bad animation of pilot with extremely unrealistic head movement and bad animation create in 2 minutes for ejection, but we finally simply never will see any ejection animation cause that will be considerate like eyecandy only, other game do it for a single short sequence but for a thing that we do a lot of time (its true we need to eject a lot of time cause immersion are bad and reaction too and finally accident happen easily) ED don't will do it...Like the explosion effect and the wing vapor and the mach vapor cone or again the ground crew and other things that we ask since several years !!!

Pilot body are missing since BS2 and A10C 1.0 cause to cockpit shadows, and anyways the pilot body that we have in BS1 are far to be nice, unrealistic color, bad forms, bad animation for the poor number that we have and no possibility to use mission data on the legs, Falcon 4 (the first) do it, but for ED sadly its considerate like useless for the sim i'm sure or for latter...

We have more chance to create our own graphic engine (with nice graphic and with optimization unlike actual) with our own 3D model and animation that see ED give us a nice pilot animation...

And i really afraid to think about Combined Arms, imagine if when we embody JTAC we have the same soldier animation and the same system for moving that the pilot have...I'm sure that will happen...Its sad...

So we can maybe move our head but we don't see any ejection animation and people who will told that the same pilot body with the same animation than in this video are not possible for DCS simply lie !

Its just cause ED don't want to give us that, we have a semi realistic software completely ugly and full of bug and that will change only when ED will have time for correct that, i hope that will be soon !

 

I hope that will change one day...

Edited March 13, 2012 by Demongornot

[Fenrir]

I don't if this has been addressed but I'd like to see the weird affect when bullets impact the ground fixed. It looked fine in LOMAC but in FC2, the rounds seem to disappear into the ground and then you see what seem to be ricochets going into the sky. It's just an odd eye sore everytime I use the gun to strafe targets.

[geneb]

i want the F-15C A2G capabiliities , (at least of the Israeli one) included

 

Never a pound for air to ground! :)

 

The software for A2G was removed at or before MSIP II (Multi Stage Improvement Program, Phase II).

 

If you want to blow up what's down and shoot down what's up, get yourself a Mudhen. :D

 

g.

[PFunk]

Is there any chance that the simplified avionics found in A-10C could be ported to FC3? Pretty please? For those of us who fly with training wheels?

 

Because it has to be one of the most well-thought-out gameplay aspects for flight simulation I've seen in a very long time.

[Kenan]

I don't if this has been addressed but I'd like to see the weird affect when bullets impact the ground fixed. It looked fine in LOMAC but in FC2, the rounds seem to disappear into the ground and then you see what seem to be ricochets going into the sky. It's just an odd eye sore everytime I use the gun to strafe targets.

 

Couldn't agree more. It looks awful.

[104th_Crunch]

Is there any chance that the simplified avionics found in A-10C could be ported to FC3? Pretty please? For those of us who fly with training wheels?

 

Because it has to be one of the most well-thought-out gameplay aspects for flight simulation I've seen in a very long time.

 

FC2 has game avionics and flight modes. I am sure FC3 will as well. This part of the sim I wish was marketed more. Get the hooks into some new comers :)

 

I don't if this has been addressed but I'd like to see the weird affect when bullets impact the ground fixed. It looked fine in LOMAC but in FC2, the rounds seem to disappear into the ground and then you see what seem to be ricochets going into the sky. It's just an odd eye sore everytime I use the gun to strafe targets.

 

Youtube some video. You'll see similar effects as FC2 has now. It was changed to make it look more real. I thought the same as you as well till I looked up some vids.

[kobac]

I would like to the K-50 Black Shark simulator, add Kamov Ka-50N Nochnoy (Hokum) version with Samshit-50 target*ing system, Shkval-V, Arbalet MMS (it's used not only for targeting but also for detecting aerial threats jointly with the updated RHAWS - Radar Homing And Warning System) and R-73 or Igla-V missiles. :-)

[Rikus]

Demongornot, forget that wishlist, that´s lot of work.

 

The will do as with FC2, add 3 or 4 little things, including the planes in new scenery with BS and A10 (remember they sais at first moment they can´t add FC planes in BS ---> and finally was that they can´t do it free, but they can if you pay) and sell again.

 

The hard work they are spending in P51 and in the next US Fighter wing or i hope that, because finally the us fighter wing will fly my nephew

 

Greetings

[kobac]

As for the scenery, if there is a limit of game engine, ED might consider partition theater of: Crimean peninsula, Russian-Georgian and Nevada theatre. Then let mission authors choose where the battle will take place, and we all have more choices.

[Krebs20]

I want a US multirole aircraft for SEAD. Don't care what it is.

[kobac]

I hope they will, in FC3, improve rearming. For example as was done in MilViz F-15E - via a popup window where the pilot chooses payload.

[Cedaway]

i want the F-15C A2G capabiliities , (at least of the Israeli one) included

 

That's called F-15E ;-)

[pepin1234]

I would like ask to ED if it is possible make a helicopter model for the next FC3 series. Specially a transport one, with capacity of fire power. I know a lot of people like the Aphache but the Apache have not transport capable. The question is that if we have a flyable trasport helicopter, We can make a little more real a combat, with troops or logistic transport of rescue mission for our pilot. Even if the Heli have a FC3 avionic level will be ok. I think the best choice for that are the next:book:

 

Heavy or Light but one of bouth is ok:

 

Heavy:

 

Mi-26 or CH-47D

 

Light:

 

Mi-8MT or SH-60B

 

IA at the moment and easy flyable conversion especially the russian models

[Gaanalma]

Honestly, one thing I envy simulators as IL2 and I'd like to see implemented in the DCS in the multiplayer is that, the ability to create missions with all aircraft assigned to client and at the beginning of the mission aircraft that were not chosen by players are reassigned automaticali to the AI ...

 

I hope that in future it will be implemented this possibility!

[VTJS17_Fire]

My wish: A westerns allrounder like the Su-33, maybe the F/A-18C or F-16C.

 

+ simple FM like the other jets in FC

+ simple cockpit, not clickable

+ A/A features from the F-15C (Radar on the left MFD, weapons)

+ SEAD feature from the Su-25T (lock-radars-feature, AGM-88)

+ A/G features from the A-10A (CCRP/ CCIP, GBUs, GP-bombs, Mavericks + TV Screen on the right MFD)

+ A/G Radar-guided weapon feature from the Su-33 (AGM-86)

 

I don't know, if FC2 is so modular built. But when, it would be cool and maybe not to complicated for ED.

 

 

kind regards,

Fire

[Isegrim]

I would like to the K-50 Black Shark simulator, add Kamov Ka-50N Nochnoy (Hokum) version with Samshit-50 target*ing system, Shkval-V, Arbalet MMS (it's used not only for targeting but also for detecting aerial threats jointly with the updated RHAWS - Radar Homing And Warning System) and R-73 or Igla-V missiles. :-)

 

 

I know it sounds Hard but....Chanceless:cry:

[Fenrir]

Looking back at all the stealth fighter flight sims from 90s, I have to say I'd love to see a detailed sim on the F-22A. ( As detailed as allowed) Seems you couldn't walk into a game store in 1997 without almost stepping on a flight sim that featured the F-22, F-117 or even the YF-23.

 

This ofcourse is just nostalgia talking.

[joey45]

have to say I'd love to see a detailed sim on the F-22A

 

It will be only the airframe that will be detailed enough for ED.. everything elde would be pure guess work.

[ogata321]

A F-22/F117 sim? In 25 years for the F-117 and 50 for the F-22 we may have them if we're lucky :D :D