Plane Launch From Underwater

[Xilon_x]

That looks like an RAN Skyhawk, too. Almost positive the RAN didn't deploy into the Falklands. Also, that nose is bending like an elephant's trunk.

 

I sense shoopery is afoot.

 

ok ok

loock this

 

http://skyhawk.org/article/humor-page-two

 

 

Royal Australian Navy - Submarine Aircraft Carrier - 1970

 

The Royal Australian Navy Skyhawk, being an all-purpose aircraft, was the subject of a 1970s experimental sea trial of an A-4 on board a Royal Australian Navy submarine. There was no objection from the aviators to operating the Skyhawk from the somewhat limited deck space of the submarine. A problem with the Skyhawk's turbine cavitating while underway submerged was overcome. The diesel catapult worked just fine. However, the experiment was abandoned when the submarine's XO objected to the jet blast burning the paintwork off the sail.

[BitMaster]

Change your dealer, he's selling you the bad stuff :music_whistling:

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

ok ok

loock this

 

http://skyhawk.org/article/humor-page-two

 

 

Royal Australian Navy - Submarine Aircraft Carrier - 1970

 

The Royal Australian Navy Skyhawk, being an all-purpose aircraft, was the subject of a 1970s experimental sea trial of an A-4 on board a Royal Australian Navy submarine. There was no objection from the aviators to operating the Skyhawk from the somewhat limited deck space of the submarine. A problem with the Skyhawk's turbine cavitating while underway submerged was overcome. The diesel catapult worked just fine. However, the experiment was abandoned when the submarine's XO objected to the jet blast burning the paintwork off the sail.

 

[probad]

even if you were excused for missing the straightfaced sarcasm because you're an english-as-second-or-third-language speaker

tell me xilon, what does the url say?

Edited December 31, 2019 by probad

[rrohde]

For us uninitiated, this is always a good site to remind us of our gullibility: https://www.skeptic.com/

 

Or, we could try this:

 

Edited December 31, 2019 by rrohde

[JUICE-AWG]

That's the Sub-Launched F-15C and it's Classified...

[Mars Exulte]

 

I got a sub lunchable for ya!

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

I just noticed that the OP video is someone I actually follow on YT.

 

You should try finishing the whole video, or at least get to the part where he shows a second "launch" that shares the same water patterns and artifacts as the first, but a totally different aircraft is portrayed.

 

ParaBreakdown's whole schtick is debunking fantastical claims and videos. He's always seemed to focus on cryptids but doesn't shy away from other fantastical claims.

 

xvIPNYTzGuA

[Xilon_x]

 

 

 

 

http://www.hisutton.com/USN_AN-1_Submarine_Aircraft_Carrier.html

[Xilon_x]

 

 

 

[Northstar98]

Xilon, why do all your images look like Regulus I or Regulus II cruise missiles?

Edited January 21, 2020 by Northstar98

[Xilon_x]

Xilon, why do all your images look like either SSM-N-8 Regulus I or SSM-N-9 Regulus II cruise missiles?

 

Yes, right

 

 

[Mars Exulte]

Xilon, it literally says "Regulus II" on the nose of those vehicles. Outdated technical drawings are irrelevant. It SAYS on the side of the vehicle. Those are missiles. Exactly ONE of those is a prototype aircraft, as you can see the cockpit.

[Mars Exulte]

 

 

Regulus II missile, says so in cursive on the nose.

 

 

 

 

Obviously Regulus Is.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The other images are pretty pictures that have no relevance to reality.

Edited January 19, 2020 by zhukov032186

[Mars Exulte]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Both Regulus IIs. Says so on the side of the plane.

 

 

 

 

Real airplane.

 

 

Other images are irrelevant "pretty pictures".

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

Might as well be posting images of the fighter from Sub-Terrania on the Genesis/Mega Drive.

 

That thing could go underwater AND fly! Also, why hasn't the Ushakov LPL been posted yet?

Edited January 20, 2020 by MiG21bisFishbedL