Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, BIGNEWY said:

Hi, 

 

it is related to the aiming error mechanics, it has been adjusted by the team. 

 

thanks

Thanks!  So to clarify, are we saying that the -120s now have a greater chance of missing, or a lower chance of missing? 

  • Like 1
  • ED Team
Posted
50 minutes ago, Stearmandriver said:

Thanks!  So to clarify, are we saying that the -120s now have a greater chance of missing, or a lower chance of missing? 

 

they have decreased the deviation, so a higher chance of hitting.

 

Please note: INS / DATA link work is still ongoing, and Chaff fix is not in yet, still requires more testing.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal

Posted
15 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

they have decreased the deviation, so a higher chance of hitting.

 

 

/SCNR :biggrin:

  • Like 1

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted (edited)

my brain is now not where it was, and very lost after a couple of "it is and it is not" at some point I thought I was listening to time travel theory lol

Edited by Revs
  • Like 1

Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8GHz / 32GB( 4x8 ) @ 3.2GHz / 1TB ADATA NVMe System Drive / 232GB NVMe Samsung 960 / ASUS dual RTX 2080ti / Reverb / Rift CV1 / T-16000M FCS flight pack

 

A10C/M2000C/F5E/SA342/Mi8/UH1H/KA50/AJS-37/FA-18C/AV-8B/F-14/Mig29/CA/SU-27

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...