USS Omaha observe strange transmedium veicles

[Mars Exulte]

 

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

Someone should use one of our All American time machines to go back in time and introduce Xilon to the concept of a non-alcoholic beverage.

[Svsmokey]

33 minutes ago, Mars Exulte said:

 

I wouldn't have gotten away with that joke if it wasn't ambiguous

Edited May 28, 2021 by Svsmokey

[Черный Дракул]

On 5/24/2021 at 7:59 PM, SUBS17 said:

it is so convenient for people to be abducted from their property and imprisoned under the Mental Health Act when there is nothing wrong with them. It always is the way in which a Nazi thinks and operates isn't it?

No, the Nazi Third Reich was a typical fascist state with national extremism extreme nationalism as ideology. "Nazi" and "fascist" are not about how they treated people -- look at the history of any colonial or slaver state and see a lot of hair-raising stuff, while defnintely not being neither nazi nor fascist. As the most renowned example, see Belgian Kongo genocide history, Belgium being a monarchy at the time. So it's about granting the direct political power to the upper bourgeoise (turning the state into successful oligarchy in the process), generally through suppression of worker's rights, most importantly -- subjugation of labor unions, often carried out through acts of terror. That is the ultimate way for these at power to increase their "capital" without much opposition -- and if their little crazed puppet with their hairy hand up their proverbial wants to commit some mass murders (of people considered "cultured" this time) following his national ideas, they won't have anything against it while they continue getting their benefits. 

Edited May 28, 2021 by Черный Дракул

[Xilon_x]

the americans say that these uaps have violated their airspace and that these uaps have approached naval naval vessels.
QUESTION:

why didn't the American ships fire?

in the video we see that it is difficult to lock onto the uap target but the american pilots did it because they didn't shoot?

Edited May 28, 2021 by Xilon_x

[Mars Exulte]

3 hours ago, Xilon_x said:

QUESTION:

why didn't the American ships fire?

  Well, right upfront... because they're not stupid? You don't go around shooting at random blips or ''I don't know what it is''.

 

Quote

in the video we see that it is difficult to lock onto the uap target but the american pilots did it because they didn't shoot?

  Why would they shoot? They're not being threatened. It seems you've noticed the average person is not a murderous psycho. Congratulations.

Edited May 28, 2021 by Mars Exulte

[Northstar98]

Just to hopefully restore some balance to the universe:

 

 

If it helps though, I did find a super clear image (at least compared to these) of something that is 100% a real transmedium vehicle, and you could say it's kinda tic-tac shaped, though a fairly elongated. As a bonus it doesn't seem to have an exhaust plume at all.

 

Watch out, this might actually blow your mind.

 

Spoiler

 

Edited May 28, 2021 by Northstar98

[Mars Exulte]

There's a reason these UFO videos are always really grainy, poor quality, with indistinct shapes, and extremely open to speculation : because if it's an actual decent video, you can tell clearly it's a plane, drone, lens flare, etc etc etc. UFO speculation is directly connected to ''crap audio/video''.

 

  In an age of widespread cameras, public access to data (including radar) and and and : bizarrely nobody ever has a decent shot that's not obviously CGI. A cop or celebrity can't pick their nose without it being all over the planet within 20 minutes, but somehow... someway... this is the best garbage we can scrape together on yetis, bigfoot, and aliens.

 

Think about that for a minute.

[Northstar98]

54 minutes ago, Mars Exulte said:

There's a reason these UFO videos are always really grainy, poor quality, with indistinct shapes, and extremely open to speculation : because if it's an actual decent video, you can tell clearly it's a plane, drone, lens flare, etc etc etc. UFO speculation is directly connected to ''crap audio/video''.

 

Abso-friggin-lutely.

 

Plus the term UFO is about as vague a classification as you can get, as well as its recent euphemism 'UAP'.

 

I also don't know why people get excited when we here "these videos are real", when absolutely nobody disputes that. Same with the idea that because the military filmed it, it can't be anything mundane, because the military are apparently infallible all of a sudden. Though who wants to bet that if the military turned around and debunked it, they'd be the first ones crying foul play.

 

Speaking of which, it always struck me as funny about a conspiracy theory to cover up the Rendlesham Forest incident, when all of the supporting evidence is still readily available online to anyone googling it, as well as subsequent interviews of the witnesses. 

 

Quote

In an age of widespread cameras, public access to data (including radar) and and and : bizarrely nobody ever has a decent shot that's not obviously CGI. A cop or celebrity can't pick their nose without it being all over the planet within 20 minutes, but somehow... someway... this is the best garbage we can scrape together on yetis, bigfoot, and aliens.

 

Think about that for a minute.

 

Exactly.

Edited May 28, 2021 by Northstar98

[Xilon_x]

 

per la veridicità degli avvistamenti UAP ci sono prove radar documentate e filmate.

 

 

 

 

Edited May 28, 2021 by Xilon_x

[Xilon_x]

3 hours ago, Mars Exulte said:

There's a reason these UFO videos are always really grainy, poor quality, with indistinct shapes, and extremely open to speculation : because if it's an actual decent video, you can tell clearly it's a plane, drone, lens flare, etc etc etc. UFO speculation is directly connected to ''crap audio/video''.

 

  In an age of widespread cameras, public access to data (including radar) and and and : bizarrely nobody ever has a decent shot that's not obviously CGI. A cop or celebrity can't pick their nose without it being all over the planet within 20 minutes, but somehow... someway... this is the best garbage we can scrape together on yetis, bigfoot, and aliens.

 

Think about that for a minute.

 

are you in the middle of the pacific ocean at night and the uap aircraft is far away, and you also expect excellent image quality?

there are the best thermal imaging cameras radar thermoscanner in short, there is the best technology of the American navy and do you want to expect excellent image quality?

ARE YOU KIDDING?

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

12 hours ago, Xilon_x said:

the americans say that these uaps have violated their airspace and that these uaps have approached naval naval vessels.
QUESTION:

why didn't the American ships fire?

in the video we see that it is difficult to lock onto the uap target but the american pilots did it because they didn't shoot?

 

I see you're eagerly awaiting DCS: Su-15 Flagon.

 

[Mars Exulte]

49 minutes ago, Xilon_x said:

 

are you in the middle of the pacific ocean at night and the uap aircraft is far away, and you also expect excellent image quality?

  Yes? Do you think it's coincidence that ''far away, at night, on a FLIR'' translates to ''UAP''? Do you still not get it? The ONLY REASON it's a ''UAP'' AT ALL is BECAUSE it's ''far away, at night, on a FLIR''. If it was ''nearby, during the day, on a TV'' it would be an obvious boat/plane/balloon/lens flare/etc.

 

49 minutes ago, Xilon_x said:

there are the best thermal imaging cameras radar thermoscanner in short, there is the best technology of the American navy and do you want to expect excellent image quality?

  Yes?

 

49 minutes ago, Xilon_x said:

ARE YOU KIDDING?

No. Are you grasping frantically at straws? Yes.

[Xilon_x]

this is official document

 

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39913/multiple-destroyers-were-swarmed-by-mysterious-drones-off-california-over-numerous-nights

[Mars Exulte]

1 hour ago, Xilon_x said:

this is official document

 

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39913/multiple-destroyers-were-swarmed-by-mysterious-drones-off-california-over-numerous-nights

 

  That's not an ''official document''. It's a media site, describing their research, itself a composite of reports, ship logs, and FOIA data. The same site has an article on ''mannequin mountain'' on their front page, so let's not take them TOO seriously.

 

  As for the incident itself : 100 miles offshore is well within international waters. They were conducting exercises, in international waters.

 

They were observed by a number of ''objects'' (read: drones) over a period of several days.

 

''Well beyond the capacity of commercial units'' means ''you can't buy one at Walmart''. Predators are drones with multi-hour, hundreds of miles flight profiles, so that is a meaningless phrase.

 

''Low visibility under 1nm'' a mile is still pretty good visibility. Is it ''barnstorming through beggar's canyon in a F-15'' visibility? No, but more than enough for practical observation purposes, especially if you're not observing exclusively in visible spectrums (which is like 100% guaranteed). Again ''at night with poor visibility'' translates to ''UAP''. If it was daytime and well lit we'd probably be reading about Chinese/Russian drones harrassing the US navy ''off their shores!!!!1!'' (The media loves highlighting legal activities in international waters in sensational terms).

Edited May 28, 2021 by Mars Exulte

[SUBS17]

5 hours ago, Mars Exulte said:

There's a reason these UFO videos are always really grainy, poor quality, with indistinct shapes, and extremely open to speculation : because if it's an actual decent video, you can tell clearly it's a plane, drone, lens flare, etc etc etc. UFO speculation is directly connected to ''crap audio/video''.

 

  In an age of widespread cameras, public access to data (including radar) and and and : bizarrely nobody ever has a decent shot that's not obviously CGI. A cop or celebrity can't pick their nose without it being all over the planet within 20 minutes, but somehow... someway... this is the best garbage we can scrape together on yetis, bigfoot, and aliens.

 

Think about that for a minute.

 

In the case of the Tic Tac video the actual AEROSPACE-FIGHTER shape is significantly different. GRYPHON is a triangle shape. The image was hidden by "CENTRE" who is the Law Enforcement Agency in Heaven. HumanKind was not allowed to see by video (except the Pilots and WSO's in the Superhornet's) the actual shape as it was secret back then which is why it was a Tic Tac shape. That incident was over International Waters but it turned into an incident where aggressive behavior was observed which is unacceptable. The pilots of both Superhornet's were spoken to over guard by the pilot of GRYPHON during the incident and it was explained to them that they were in the wrong. That part is not yet mentioned over the internet or news. In the case of a dogfight vs GRYPHON who is 400 meters long both SuperhHornets would not have been able to out turn GRYPHON. GRYPHON can stop in a second and accelerate to Mach 4 in 3 seconds. GRYPHON can also reach the moon in 8 minutes and exceed the speed of light in atmosphere. Someday we may see some cool VTOL at Airshows by GRYPHON as GRYPHON is extremely maneuverable. People may then be able to take clear HD videos, GRYPHON is extremely loud and sounds like an X-Wing off Star Wars. I've seen GRYPHON and another AEROSPACE-FIGHTER doing Zig Zag moves in the upper atmosphere, it is extremely cool to observe. Nothing on earth comes close and their formation was like a standard fighter formation with one fighter in front. GRYPHON did a Zig Zag in front of those SuperHornets before departing towards HIGH-ORBIT.      

[Xilon_x]

39 minutes ago, Mars Exulte said:

 

  Non è un ''documento ufficiale''. È un sito di media, che descrive la loro ricerca, a sua volta un insieme di rapporti, registri di navi e dati FOIA. Lo stesso sito ha un articolo sulla ''montagna dei manichini'' in prima pagina, quindi non prendiamoli TROPPO sul serio.

 

  Per quanto riguarda l'incidente stesso: 100 miglia al largo è ben all'interno delle acque internazionali. Stavano conducendo esercitazioni, in acque internazionali.

 

Sono stati osservati da un numero di "oggetti" (leggi: droni) per un periodo di diversi giorni.

 

''Ben oltre la capacità delle unità commerciali'' significa ''non puoi comprarne una da Walmart''. I predatori sono droni con profili di volo di diverse ore e centinaia di miglia, quindi questa è una frase senza senso.

 

''Bassa visibilità sotto 1 nm'' un miglio è ancora una visibilità abbastanza buona. È "barnstorming attraverso il canyon del mendicante con la visibilità di un F-15"? No, ma più che sufficiente per scopi di osservazione pratica, specialmente se non stai osservando esclusivamente negli spettri visibili (che è garantito al 100%). Di nuovo ''di notte con scarsa visibilità'' si traduce in ''UAP''. Se fosse giorno e ben illuminato, probabilmente leggeremmo di droni cinesi/russi che molestano la marina statunitense "al largo delle loro coste!!!!1!" (I media adorano evidenziare le attività legali in acque internazionali in termini sensazionali).

 

 

 

 

so for the tea they are not UAP but they are simply Chinese drones ok ok. I wait for you in a month pentagon, intelligence agencies and fbi will have to tell the truth about ufo or uap. you can't hide this for over 70 years.

https://nypost.com/2020/12/29/covid-19-bill-started-a-180-day-countdown-for-ufo-disclosures/

 

 

[Northstar98]

3 hours ago, Xilon_x said:

 

per la veridicità degli avvistamenti UAP ci sono prove radar documentate e filmate.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/uss-omaha-ufo-uap-radar-video.11762/

 

Though personally, "138 knots, hoh(?) it's going fast!"

 

Since when was 138 knots fast? 

 

I don't know, likely small objects, doing bird-like speeds (40-50 knots), no visual sighting at all - hmmmmm....

 

EDIT: And this is from a navigation RADAR, though if it's like most it'll produce a vertical fan shaped beam, so it could probably pick up airborne stuff.

Edited May 29, 2021 by Northstar98

[MiG21bisFishbedL]

35 minutes ago, Xilon_x said:

 

 

 

so for the tea they are not UAP but they are simply Chinese drones ok ok. I wait for you in a month pentagon, intelligence agencies and fbi will have to tell the truth about ufo or uap. you can't hide this for over 70 years.

https://nypost.com/2020/12/29/covid-19-bill-started-a-180-day-countdown-for-ufo-disclosures/

 

 

You were also very convinced about the Area 51 raid's legitimacy. Yet, no alien cheeks got clapped in the end.

[Mars Exulte]

1 hour ago, MiG21bisFishbedL said:

You were also very convinced about the Area 51 raid's legitimacy. Yet, no alien cheeks got clapped in the end.

 Zing

[SUBS17]

1 hour ago, Mars Exulte said:

 Zing

Are you guys talking about Groom Lake? No one calls it Area 51 that works there.

3 hours ago, Northstar98 said:

 

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/uss-omaha-ufo-uap-radar-video.11762/

 

Though personally, "138 knots, hoh(?) it's going fast!"

 

Since when was 138 knots fast? 

 

I don't know, likely small objects, doing bird-like speeds (40-50 knots), no visual sighting at all - hmmmmm....

 

EDIT: And this is from a navigation RADAR, though if it's like most it'll produce a vertical fan shaped beam, so it could probably pick up airborne stuff.

 

 

138 Knots is a sign of VTOL if a AEROSPACE-CRAFT is flying that slow. Aerodynamic Shape also indicates a UFO's VTOL if it does not have what appears to be an AERODYNAMIC SHAPE that has CONTROL SURFACES for flight within atmosphere. It is a UFO unless someone identifies it. 

[Mars Exulte]

https://www.cnet.com/news/astronaut-chris-hadfield-calls-alien-ufo-hype-foolishness/

 

I'm just gonna... leave this here.

[SUBS17]

16 hours ago, Mars Exulte said:

https://www.cnet.com/news/astronaut-chris-hadfield-calls-alien-ufo-hype-foolishness/

 

I'm just gonna... leave this here.

 

 

You do that and continue hiding underground. lol.

[Черный Дракул]

On 5/30/2021 at 8:30 PM, SUBS17 said:

You do that and continue hiding underground. lol.

While the black helicopters are on their way to your location, let me post here a quote from that:

Quote

 to see something in the sky that you don't understand and then to immediately conclude that it's intelligent life from another solar system is the height of foolishness and lack of logic.

He said an obvious thing there. Wanting to believe has nothing to do with declaring random stuff you're not sure about the thing you want to believe. Calling out that lack of logic is a thing any sane person can do with ease, he doesn't have to be an astronaut to be capable of that. And it, obviously, has nothing to do with hiding from some "scary truth" (which is neither scary nor, as we see above, truth). Attacking basic logics will do you no good, sorry. And good luck with those G-Men from these black helicopters. 

[SUBS17]

On 6/1/2021 at 10:58 AM, Черный Дракул said:

While the black helicopters are on their way to your location, let me post here a quote from that:

He said an obvious thing there. Wanting to believe has nothing to do with declaring random stuff you're not sure about the thing you want to believe. Calling out that lack of logic is a thing any sane person can do with ease, he doesn't have to be an astronaut to be capable of that. And it, obviously, has nothing to do with hiding from some "scary truth" (which is neither scary nor, as we see above, truth). Attacking basic logics will do you no good, sorry. And good luck with those G-Men from these black helicopters. 

You can send your helicopters, do the people on board notice a ringing sound? lol.