Rissala Posted December 14, 2021 Posted December 14, 2021 The off road performance of the F-18/16 is just pure fantasy. These fighters were never intended for any soft field ops. Common sense applies here. No U.S. fighter should be able to go at 300 knots off road, simply because they were not designed for it. (duh) This is a somewhat annoying issue since now it is totally possible to troll people in multiplayer by landing on a mountain for example and taking off behind an enemy hornet off road.mp4 Meanwhile the aircraft that did have soft field capabilities (MiG-29, SU-25) are completely useless on soft fields since the steering always breaks and the structure collapses on some random bumps. But that is a topic for another ticket. Hornet off road.trk 1
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted December 14, 2021 ED Team Posted December 14, 2021 If you take any aircraft in DCS and land it off the detailed terrain area you will find very flat terrain. Try it on the detailed area Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
ED Team NineLine Posted December 14, 2021 ED Team Posted December 14, 2021 To add to this, terrain types are very simple currently in DCS, it is planned to add various types of different terrain that should fix many of these issues, its no easy task and will probably need to wait till we have a little more room, performance wise, to allow all sorts of different conditions. Thanks. 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Rissala Posted December 14, 2021 Author Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) 17 minutes ago, BIGNEWY said: If you take any aircraft in DCS and land it off the detailed terrain area you will find very flat terrain. Try it on the detailed area It is the same for any terrain. You can land the Hornet and F-16 on mountains. Do I need to provide a track for that also? Edited December 14, 2021 by Rissala
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted December 14, 2021 ED Team Posted December 14, 2021 Just now, Rissala said: It is the same for any terrain. You can land the Hornet and F-16 on mountains. Do I need to provide a track for that also. make sure you are using the detailed terrain areas, not off the detailed areas. And yes, please attach a track replay, Please also note ninelines comment above. Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Rissala Posted December 14, 2021 Author Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) 20 minutes ago, NineLine said: To add to this, terrain types are very simple currently in DCS, it is planned to add various types of different terrain that should fix many of these issues, its no easy task and will probably need to wait till we have a little more room, performance wise, to allow all sorts of different conditions. Thanks. Is it completely unrealistic for ED to remove the ability to land anywhere from these 2 fighters? Make it similar to FC3? Edited December 14, 2021 by Rissala
Rissala Posted December 14, 2021 Author Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, BIGNEWY said: make sure you are using the detailed terrain areas, not off the detailed areas. And yes, please attach a track replay, Please also note ninelines comment above. Well here is me landing on the tallest peak on caucasus with the Hornet. I do a full landing, stop and then a takeoff. I get that developing new stuff affecting massive amounts of terrain is incredibly slow. But that workload can be avoided if it is possible to just change the way F-18/16 tires interact with the ground. landing on a mountain.mp4 At the very least, can you make it behave like the FC3 where the tires collapse when in contact with terrain for some time? This would already fix the problem fully and avoid many years of development. Hornet off road landing on tallest mountain on cauc.trk For reference, here is a MiG-29A landing on a mountain. (Same for all terrain thb) The front suspension collapses on a bump and I lose all stability and NWS. This is still better than allowing F-18s to land off road anywhere. MiG-29 mountain landing.mp4 Final edit: I also want to be very clear that I recognise the fact that this is not a priority issue in any way. Quite the opposite. It would however be nice for someone to officially say that this is not intended/realistic behaviour. Thats all. Edited December 14, 2021 by Rissala 2
Vampiresquid Posted December 14, 2021 Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) I reported this here as well.. There are other aircraft which are offroad capable like the SU25 , SU33 and dont know about f14 but viggen as well.. and those aircraft can really not do what the hornet can.. It is really overperforming.. F16 can taxi fine but cannot takeoff or land .. hornet can do anything offroad... And just for info we are blueflag players we get a lot of farps and roadbases to see and test this out.. Edited December 14, 2021 by Vampiresquid
Swift. Posted December 15, 2021 Posted December 15, 2021 Perhaps the solution here isnt to potentially artificially snap an aircrafts gear, but rather to FOD the engines. 476th Discord | 476th Website | Swift Youtube Ryzen 5800x, RTX 4070ti, 64GB, Quest 2
Rissala Posted December 15, 2021 Author Posted December 15, 2021 Anything to not allow this behaviour would be nice. Be it the FC3 tires approach or this.
Recommended Posts