dedlike. Posted September 29, 2022 Posted September 29, 2022 I havent been flying the apache in quite some time now, but i cant seem to get the apache over 120-130 knots anymore, before this update, if i realy pushed it i could manage to go around 140-145 knots, same conditions ofc
bradmick Posted September 30, 2022 Posted September 30, 2022 120 to 130 knots for a loaded aircraft with an FCR, 2 hellfire launchers and 2 rocket pods is accurate. 1 1
Hiob Posted September 30, 2022 Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) 36 minutes ago, bradmick said: 120 to 130 knots for a loaded aircraft with an FCR, 2 hellfire launchers and 2 rocket pods is accurate. Do you have a reference number for a clean bird? Just out of curiosity. Edited September 30, 2022 by Hiob "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
dedlike. Posted September 30, 2022 Author Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) well , my numbers were with 2 hellfire launchers, no fcr, no rocketpods, i could understand it with rocket pods tho since they dont exactly scream areodynamics Edited September 30, 2022 by dedlike.
Hiob Posted September 30, 2022 Posted September 30, 2022 Just now, dedlike. said: well , my numbers were with 2 hellfire launchers, no fcr, no rocketpods, i could understand it with rocket pods tho since they dont exactly scream areodynamics Are you trimmed N-T or aerodynamicly? "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Dagobert666 Posted September 30, 2022 Posted September 30, 2022 (edited) I've always been told that the cruising speed of an Apache is 120Kt and the top speed is somewhere around 160Kt.... But if you google it, the top speed of an AH64D is around 143Kt.... The Apache is real not a sprinter... More a comfortable jogger^^ Edited September 30, 2022 by Dagobert666
dedlike. Posted September 30, 2022 Author Posted September 30, 2022 vor 2 Stunden schrieb Hiob: Are you trimmed N-T or aerodynamicly? N-T but tbh, i dont have a problem with the slower speed, its just that im not used to itand well.. it suprises me that the apache is not realy any faster than a Huey basicly
Hiob Posted September 30, 2022 Posted September 30, 2022 3 minutes ago, dedlike. said: N-T but tbh, i dont have a problem with the slower speed, its just that im not used to itand well.. it suprises me that the apache is not realy any faster than a Huey basicly Well, the AH-64s design never struck me as "optimized for speed".... But N-T isn't the proper trimming for top speed if I'm not mistaken. "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
ED Team Solution Raptor9 Posted September 30, 2022 ED Team Solution Posted September 30, 2022 A-models were indeed faster, but they had less drag and weighed less. If you load down an airplane with additional weight, it needs to increase it's angle-of-attack at a given airspeed to produce more lift to counter the additional weight. As a result, the higher AoA increases drag, requiring more thrust to maintain the same airspeed and lowering the overall top speed in level flight accordingly. Helicopters must also increase their angle-of-attack, using collective, to maintain level flight at a given speed at higher gross weights. This increases drag on the rotor system and reduces performance if more engine power and rotor lift is being used to maintain altitude instead of propulsion. (Mi-24 is able to offset this with substantial lift production from the wings, retaining more rotor power for propulsion in forward flight) So with the additional drag from the larger fuselage profile (even without the FCR installed) along with the increase in gross weight, the AH-64D is slightly slower than earlier A-models. More engine/rotor power must be utilized for lift versus propulsion, and the increase in frontal drag further impacts the speed as well; although not to the same magnitude as the increase in gross weight. In any case, the addition of the FCR has additional drag and weight impacts, as does going out with a full load of fuel and weapons. It's no different than trying to takeoff in an A-10 loaded like a B-52; reaching 200 knots and 5,000 feet will take an eternity, and your turning radius and maneuverability will be horrendous. Just because you can physically carry all of that, doesn't mean it is tactically sound to do so if you can't maneuver as needed. 5 2 Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man. DCS Rotor-Head
petsild Posted May 14, 2023 Posted May 14, 2023 Hi, the principle of how the helicopter works is clear to me, but the explanation from Raptor9 is general for all helicopters. But this does not correspond to our Apache, what is in the DCS, if I remove the weight of the helicopter, without ammunition, fuel and without FSR, it is still too slow and the comfortable control speed is at a low 125-135knots. Moreover, after exceeding such a speed, the helicopter becomes quite uncontrollable. At the same time, all well-known military encyclopedias mention significantly higher speeds of the loaded machine! Please ED Apache needs flight model revision thank you. https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/apache-attack-helicopter-ah-64d-e/ 1 MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4, Kingston 3600 MHz 64 Gb, i5 12600K, Gigabyte RTX 4090, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus,VKB NXT Premium.
Recommended Posts