Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, currenthill said:

Yep, that's the issue here. I went with the OSINT data regarding cannon elevation, but it doesn't really add up. Since the elevation is between +20 and +70 it doesn't really give it room to stretch out. I've been looking for more info on the asset while fiddling around with it and noticed on some photos that the elevation goes closer to +-0 when it's rotated (and the cab isn't in its way).

And that is how I plan to implement it. If you want to fire at close range targets you will have to turn the vehicle more perpendicular to the target.

I will perform more tests with angles! 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Kappa-131st said:

I will perform more tests with angles! 🙂

Hmm. Doesn't work very well 😞
I try diverses angles of fire. First and second target (10 & 23 km) does not fire in any angles I test 😞

art3.jpg

Posted
23 hours ago, Kappa-131st said:

Hmm. Doesn't work very well 😞
I try diverses angles of fire. First and second target (10 & 23 km) does not fire in any angles I test 😞

art3.jpg

That's not surprising, I haven't released the updated version yet. 😅

Posted

image.pngPCL-181 SPG (China) version 1.2.0 released!
Changelog Version 1.2.0

  • Changed 155mm unguided HE minimum range to 3 km
  • Changed elevation limits to 7-70 degrees when clear from the cab
  • Changed max engagement azimuth to 120/120
  • Changed range and azimuth markers in ME

In this updated version I have extended the rotation limits to 120/120 degrees. And when you have cleared the cab at around 25/25 degrees the cannon will elevate down to 7 degrees for the really short range targets. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Posted

hi,there seems to be some conflict between your aircraft module and the Army&Navy module after November 11th,when I spawn any aircraft module (MiG29/SU-24/B-21/TB2) in the mission editor, most   other vehicle and warship module will not spawn on the map,I'm not sure if this is just my problem, hope you can test it out when you have some free time.thanks

Posted
20 minutes ago, Gogi12 said:

Puma IFV? :)

That is correct! 👌🏻

6 minutes ago, HighMaintenanceB said:

 Beautiful! Do you want me to find you a 3D model of one with the Spike LR missile launcher for a future release? 

Thanks! This is the A1, but I was planning to add the S1 version with the MELLS in the future. I just need to add the launcher. 

  • Like 3
Posted
4 hours ago, currenthill said:

By the way, unfortunately the latest DCS update doesn't seem to fix the erratic cruise missile behavior of going into orbits.

I see same issue... With guided munitions of the PCL ^^ (It happen sometime).

I hope ED fix quickly all thoses bugs ^^

Posted
5 часов назад, currenthill сказал:

By the way, unfortunately the latest DCS update doesn't seem to fix the erratic cruise missile behavior of going into orbits.

I launched SLAM yesterday. All ok. 🤔

  • Like 1

YouTube - WaffenCatLive

 

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64 | ASrock Fatal1ty K4 gaming x470 | SSD m.2 Samsung 970 EVO | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (4.3Ghz) | RAM 32G ddr4 ballistix Sport (3200MHz) | Super JetStream GeForce RTX2080 | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | TrackIR 5 + TrackClip PRO :pilotfly:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
1 hour ago, currenthill said:

I have a test mission containing Arleigh Burke firing Tomahawks. Half of them still went into orbit.

I Ask @Flappie yesterday if this bug is corrected, his response was "Not in today's update, but a fix is in the works."

We'll have to wait a little longer.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

MSI Z97 Gaming 5 - Intel I7 4790K - Artic cooling freezer 7 pro rev 2 - GSKILL 32 Go - SSD Crucial M5 120 go - SSD Crucial 2To - HDD western digital caviar blue 1 TO - Gigabyte GTX 1070 Gaming G1 - Windows 10 home 64 bits

Posted
23 hours ago, currenthill said:

By the way, unfortunately the latest DCS update doesn't seem to fix the erratic cruise missile behavior of going into orbits.

It's strange that they added "a small random trajectory spread of cruise and anti-ship missiles so that they do not fly exactly one after the other and do not collide"

At the same time, without eliminating the main bug

 

  • Like 3

Mr. Croco

Posted (edited)

Hi Currenthill,

Some eye candy for our creator 🤩

Piranha V (Switzerland)

Piranha V (Switzerland).JPG

Finland Patria AMV XP

Finland Patria AMV XP 1.jpg

USA m1296_dragoon_l1

USA m1296_dragoon_l1.jpg

UK ARES

UK ARES 1.jpg

M1283 (United States)

M1283 (United States).jpg

USA M7A4 BFIST

image.jpeg

 

Edited by RWC
  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, RWC said:

Hi Currenthill,

Some eye candy for our creator 🤩

Piranha V (Switzerland)

Piranha V (Switzerland).JPG

Finland Patria AMV XP

Finland Patria AMV XP 1.jpg

USA m1296_dragoon_l1

USA m1296_dragoon_l1.jpg

UK ARES

UK ARES 1.jpg

M1283 (United States)

M1283 (United States).jpg

USA M7A4 BFIST

image.jpeg

 

 

i think that's a Linebacker not BFIST

  • Like 1
Posted

 Eu tenho um problema nos mods seus do DCS é que quando vou criar uma simulação não aparece nada nem os veículos e aviões do jogo original, pode-me ajudar?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Reichsmarschall said:

i think that's a Linebacker not BFIST

You are 50% correct because it's base chassis is of a Bradley (Y)

*( info: https://www.militarytoday.com/apc/m7_bradley.htm) The M7 Bradley is the US Army's forward observation vehicle. It is based on the M2A2 Bradley ODS infantry fighting vehicle chassis. This variant was specially designed to replace the M981 FISTV forward observation vehicle, based on the M113 armored personnel carrier chassis. Its official designation is M7 Bradley Fire Support Team Vehicle, or M7 BFiST.

* Here is a link to a great site with all the military currently available with some great detailed info !  ( https://www.militarytoday.com/apc.htm )

Plz enjoy.

RWC.

Edited by RWC
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RWC said:

You are 50% correct because it's base chassis is of a Bradley (Y)

*( info: https://www.militarytoday.com/apc/m7_bradley.htm) The M7 Bradley is the US Army's forward observation vehicle. It is based on the M2A2 Bradley ODS infantry fighting vehicle chassis. This variant was specially designed to replace the M981 FISTV forward observation vehicle, based on the M113 armored personnel carrier chassis. Its official designation is M7 Bradley Fire Support Team Vehicle, or M7 BFiST.

* Here is a link to a great site with all the military currently available with some great detailed info !  ( https://www.militarytoday.com/apc.htm )

Plz enjoy.

RWC.

 


Hi there,

The image posted above appears to be an M7 Linebacker.  The BFiST lacks the starboard turret optical port of the Linebacker, and the Linebacker as pictured lacks the Fire Support Sensor System.  Critically, the BFiST features an armored optics box where the standard Bradley mounts a TOW launcher, which is where the Linebacker mounts a Stinger quad-pack as seen above.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Reichsmarschall said:

i think that's a Linebacker not BFIST

I put the M981, the BFIST, the Stryker version and a bunch of other FA support vehicles on the wishlist in forums.  An M 577 Command vehicle would be nice too.

  • Like 2
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...