MAXsenna Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 4 minutes ago, Hiob said: I had a two ship flight with an instructor. So ITT was in check! Lucky bastard!
Hiob Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 2 minutes ago, MAXsenna said: Lucky bastard! Yes, but RTFM does help indeed! 1 "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Rudel_chw Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 55 minutes ago, MAXsenna said: I actually burned through a lot of engines before I bothered to read the manual. I had the opposite experience: I found the emergency procedures section of the manual really enjoyable… it gave more purpose to flying a trainer on DCS, here is part of my journey on that subject: 2 1 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Daemoc Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 I forgot how stable the C-101 was as a ground attack platform. I just did a quick ground attack mission today and even without using it for a long while, it was like using easy mode. 1 Ryzen7 5800X3D - MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk MAX - 64Gb 3600MHz DDR4 - RX 6950 XT - SoundBlaster -Z
Hiob Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 8 hours ago, Rudel_chw said: I had the opposite experience: I found the emergency procedures section of the manual really enjoyable… it gave more purpose to flying a trainer on DCS, here is part of my journey on that subject: Wow, that is actually a very good thread! It deserves more attention! The devs really put a lot of effort in this part of the simulation! 2 "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
MAXsenna Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 I had the opposite experience: I found the emergency procedures section of the manual really enjoyable… it gave more purpose to flying a trainer on DCS, here is part of my journey on that subject: Oh, I agree with that. I also find emergency procedures enjoyable, and I did all your C-101 missions.But when the engine's broken, it's broken. Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk 1
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 I love this little plane, my only recommendation, if you weren´t told before, is to fly with 50% fuel or even less, unless you are planning on a 6 hour flight Its fuel capacity is insane and having less soup makes a big difference, specially on takeoffs 1
Hiob Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 6 hours ago, AKULA_OPTIMUS said: I love this little plane, my only recommendation, if you weren´t told before, is to fly with 50% fuel or even less, unless you are planning on a 6 hour flight Its fuel capacity is insane and having less soup makes a big difference, specially on takeoffs Yeah, I got the memo. It is really a nice quality module. Unfortunately the maintenance department confused the engine with a hairdryer. "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Daemoc Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 34 minutes ago, Hiob said: Yeah, I got the memo. It is really a nice quality module. Unfortunately the maintenance department confused the engine with a hairdryer. Ha! It's really not that bad. I think it's the noise it makes more than anything. It almost sounds like a toy or a model aircraft. Did you see the CC has a "Manual Power Reserve", (MPR), switch that gives it a little more kick? It's easy to miss. It's no afterburner, but it does help a bit. 1 Ryzen7 5800X3D - MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk MAX - 64Gb 3600MHz DDR4 - RX 6950 XT - SoundBlaster -Z
Chump Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) On 9/7/2023 at 4:28 PM, Hiob said: @Rudel_chw Do you know what the the „F“ in the controls overlay stands for? It is labeled as control_priority. My guess would be, "(F)ront"? Or, off/nothing is displayed there if the rear seat has priority. Edited September 8, 2023 by Chump 1 2
Rudel_chw Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 2 hours ago, Hiob said: Unfortunately the maintenance department confused the engine with a hairdryer. Unfortnately, the real C-101 sounds like that ... I tried the Mod suggested by @Daemoc and must admit that I like the change, even if not realistic listen for yourself: Cheers! 2 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Rudel_chw Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 26 minutes ago, Chump said: It is labeled as control_priority. My guess would be, "(F)ront"? Or, off/nothing is displayed there if the rear seat has priority. Thanks ... I just tested it in flight and it seems to just indicate which cockpit is the player currently using: F(front) or R (rear). Don't know if in multiplayer it works differently. 1 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Hiob Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 19 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said: Unfortnately, the real C-101 sounds like that ... I tried the Mod suggested by @Daemoc and must admit that I like the change, even if not realistic I was referring more to the thrust than to the sound…. The Sound reminds me of an airliner engine. Especially from the low pressure side. 1 "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Rudel_chw Posted September 8, 2023 Posted September 8, 2023 5 minutes ago, Hiob said: I was referring more to the thrust than to the sound…. really? ... the "hairdryer" expression threw me off For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Hiob Posted September 9, 2023 Posted September 9, 2023 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said: really? ... the "hairdryer" expression threw me off well, one comes with the other I guess. It‘s no F-16, that‘s for sure. But I didn’t expect it to be - I was just joking around. But I am very impressed with the sophisticated systems of the little bird and the impressive depth to which they are modeled! I was initially thinking that I was buying it to shelve it (to fill the blancs in my collection), but now I think I will actually use it to do some instruments and pattern training and some recreational flights. And I was never really into the whole failure procedure stuff, but your thread and the Extend to which they are modeled here may make me try it. Edited September 9, 2023 by Hiob 2 "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
kontiuka Posted September 9, 2023 Posted September 9, 2023 Nice to see such a lively discussion about the trainers. I've been a C-101 fanboi since Jan 2015. 2
MAXsenna Posted September 9, 2023 Posted September 9, 2023 7 hours ago, Hiob said: But I am very impressed with the sophisticated systems of the little bird and the impressive depth to which they are modeled! They are for sure! 7 hours ago, Hiob said: I was initially thinking that I was buying it to shelve it (to fill the blancs in my collection), but now I think I will actually use it to do some instruments and pattern training and some recreational flights It was the first module I tried in the first "Free to Play" ever. I immediately fell in love and didn't even wait to purchase it. Have you tried the training missions? They have even modeled an annoyed instructor. At least I seem to annoy the hell out of him. @Rudel_chw has made some nice missions, of course! Thanks again! 7 hours ago, Hiob said: And I was never really into the whole failure procedure stuff, but your thread and the Extend to which they are modeled here may make me try it. Yeah, once you get hooked on procedures, there's no turning back! 7 hours ago, kontiuka said: Nice to see such a lively discussion about the trainers. I've been a C-101 fanboi since Jan 2015. Yeah, us trainer fanboys are a niche in a niche in a niche!
kontiuka Posted September 9, 2023 Posted September 9, 2023 5 hours ago, MAXsenna said: They are for sure! It was the first module I tried in the first "Free to Play" ever. I immediately fell in love and didn't even wait to purchase it. Have you tried the training missions? They have even modeled an annoyed instructor. At least I seem to annoy the hell out of him. @Rudel_chw has made some nice missions, of course! Thanks again! Yeah, once you get hooked on procedures, there's no turning back! Yeah, us trainer fanboys are a niche in a niche in a niche! I'm only a C-101 fanboi so I'm a niche in a niche in a niche in a niche. Although, the L-39 was pretty fun when I trialed it. 1
MAXsenna Posted September 9, 2023 Posted September 9, 2023 I'm only a C-101 fanboi so I'm a niche in a niche in a niche in a niche. Although, the L-39 was pretty fun when I trialed it.Good one! Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk 1
Recommended Posts