C130

[Vakarian]

1 hour ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Your Pic coming from ED Wip Page (not sure the date), my Pic link coming from official ASC Discord, 20/05/2025.

Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
 

Don't you think that the developer of the C-130 knows which one is the latest? And that he was hinting to the one posted in this thread?

[Someone]

3 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Your Pic coming from ED Wip Page (not sure the date), my Pic link coming from official ASC Discord, 20/05/2025.

Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
 

Nope. I (the person who owns ASC) have never posted that picture anywhere previously…

[LavaFlight]

On 6/6/2025 at 6:57 PM, Someone said:

You are not making the compelling argument you think that you are making.

Not being rude, genuinely asking. What’re you trying to show off here? This screenshot doesn't make sense to me as far as not making a compelling argument, in my opinion everything shown is the same stuff since as seen in the 02SEP2022 promo video. I greatly look forward to paying for your beautiful product. I am not trying to antagonize you. I’m just proposing maybe was the promo video released prematurely? 
 

as danger zone was kind enough to inform me, my writing style comes off as aggressive. Working on it lol. Please do not take it as insult, I look at DCS from analytical perspective.
cheers

[LavaFlight]

Also, I dare you to make the interior lining fabric of the cabin ripple with the wind when the cargo door is open (ok now I’m antagonizing, and also joking) 

[Someone]

On 6/13/2025 at 10:26 PM, LavaFlight said:

Not being rude, genuinely asking. What’re you trying to show off here? This screenshot doesn't make sense to me as far as not making a compelling argument, in my opinion everything shown is the same stuff since as seen in the 02SEP2022 promo video. I greatly look forward to paying for your beautiful product. I am not trying to antagonize you. I’m just proposing maybe was the promo video released prematurely? 
 

as danger zone was kind enough to inform me, my writing style comes off as aggressive. Working on it lol. Please do not take it as insult, I look at DCS from analytical perspective.
cheers

In no particular order:

 

As to what I am showing here:

The content posted is not the same at all.  The entire 3d model of the cargo bay shown here is distinct/new relative to what was shown in 2022, or even the 2025 and beyond video from last December.

More critically: In 2022 there was no such thing as airdrop in DCS. Now there is. That's what I am showing here (along with the new cargo bay). 

 

Regarding your "writing style":

No, your writing style is just fine. What is less fine is your unwillingness (until now, more than a month after the first post), to respond in good faith, despite my efforts to engage with you earlier.  None of this is particularly important. People are unreasonable on the internet all the time. But I would ask you: why?

 

More generally:

If your suspicion is that the flight deck doesn't exist or something.... I don't know what to tell you. It does, as do the systems (and oh my god are there so many systems).

We are quite literally polishing things, finalizing the manuals, and doing a variety of other end-of-project tasks. 

 

With respect to why I have not posted more things:

I do not believe in trickling out incrementally-less-incomplete-images.  Those pictures will remain on the internet for eternity, and on account of their age, will rank more highly than new, polished, images that are representative of what customers get when they buy the product. So, I'm not interested in doing that.  (And I'm not kidding. I will frequently need a quick reference to the Nav-Radar of the C-130J. I'll google "C-130J Nav Radar".  You know what's usually the first result on the images tab? A picture of MY nav radar, from a few years ago.  On more than one occasion I've looked at this picture, compared it to mine (not yet noticing that it is... not an authentic reference image), and concluded that "yep", all good. Life is a rich pageant.)

 

In conclusion:

You cannot look at the volume, or nature of the images posted by me and infer the stage of completion. This was the original sin of your first post.

In general, I just post things that I think are a) cool, b) new, and c) fairly polished. 

It's not likely that I will ever show the entire cockpit in advance of opening pre orders. 

But that will be soon.

 

Thank you for your passionate support.

- Someone making an internet airplane

[cfrag]

5 hours ago, Someone said:

In general, I just post things that I think are a) cool, b) new, and c) fairly polished. 

Convinced me.

Now stop talking, start chalking. My credit card needs action!  

[LavaFlight]

14 hours ago, Someone said:

In no particular order:

 

As to what I am showing here:

The content posted is not the same at all.  The entire 3d model of the cargo bay shown here is distinct/new relative to what was shown in 2022, or even the 2025 and beyond video from last December.

More critically: In 2022 there was no such thing as airdrop in DCS. Now there is. That's what I am showing here (along with the new cargo bay). 

 

Regarding your "writing style":

No, your writing style is just fine. What is less fine is your unwillingness (until now, more than a month after the first post), to respond in good faith, despite my efforts to engage with you earlier.  None of this is particularly important. People are unreasonable on the internet all the time. But I would ask you: why?

 

More generally:

If your suspicion is that the flight deck doesn't exist or something.... I don't know what to tell you. It does, as do the systems (and oh my god are there so many systems).

We are quite literally polishing things, finalizing the manuals, and doing a variety of other end-of-project tasks. 

 

With respect to why I have not posted more things:

I do not believe in trickling out incrementally-less-incomplete-images.  Those pictures will remain on the internet for eternity, and on account of their age, will rank more highly than new, polished, images that are representative of what customers get when they buy the product. So, I'm not interested in doing that.  (And I'm not kidding. I will frequently need a quick reference to the Nav-Radar of the C-130J. I'll google "C-130J Nav Radar".  You know what's usually the first result on the images tab? A picture of MY nav radar, from a few years ago.  On more than one occasion I've looked at this picture, compared it to mine (not yet noticing that it is... not an authentic reference image), and concluded that "yep", all good. Life is a rich pageant.)

 

In conclusion:

You cannot look at the volume, or nature of the images posted by me and infer the stage of completion. This was the original sin of your first post.

In general, I just post things that I think are a) cool, b) new, and c) fairly polished. 

It's not likely that I will ever show the entire cockpit in advance of opening pre orders. 

But that will be soon.

 

Thank you for your passionate support.

- Someone making an internet airplane

I see. And I understand. I seen the mesh on the dashboard for the avionics fans vents that you implemented. I can’t even imagine designing something like that with 3d software. It would take me decades JUST to do that. 
 

you’re a legend. I submit. 

[Dangerzone]

Image from here:

\

Can't wait!!!!!

 

[les]

Moab...........mmmmmmmm

[Kang]

Just a little suggestion:

Seeing how this seems to be progressing nicely, how about throwing a thread or two in the actual dedicated section on here? It is woefully empty and decidedly unmoved since the 'here is a Discord server' post from 2022.

[Someone]

4 hours ago, Kang said:

Just a little suggestion:

Seeing how this seems to be progressing nicely, how about throwing a thread or two in the actual dedicated section on here? It is woefully empty and decidedly unmoved since the 'here is a Discord server' post from 2022.

@NineLine May I please have forum?