Logan54 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Hello all. I searched for 2000-5 wishes, but didn`t found anything. So, if it possible, I`d wish to see this multirole with amazing cockpit in DCS. I think, 2 seater M2K with good A2G performance will be great addition. 2000-5 is export version, so probably its possible. 3
F-2 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Translated article by the RDY Radar developer RDY.pdf "LE PROGRAMME RADAR RDY" Nouvelle Revue d'Aeronautique et d*Astronauti Stealthflanker at Secretprojects estimated range Quote I'am doing range prediction for the radar. The assumption is as follows : Frequency : 11 GHz as the RDY-2 documents mention more than 33 dB gain, this indicates narrower beamwidth than RDM's 3.6 degrees. Antenna Gain : 36 dB Receiver Noise figure : 5 dB which i feel reasonable for conventional radars of today (Skolnik's introduction to radar give 12-15 dB for WWII radars and 8 dB for radar in 1960's. In other hand MiG-31's Zaslon have 5.5 dB. Ausairpower assumes 9dB for conventional MSA's) Average power is 400 Watt as per radartutorial and RDY Brochure i recalled. For detection and tracking, 2 False alarm rate threshold are assumed 10^-6 and 10^-7 respectively. Probability of Detection for detection is 50% while tracking is 90%. Swerling case-1 is assumed. This yield required SNR of 13.3 dB and 23.5 dB respectively. Beam dwell is 0.025 second/beam which is how long the radar beam will stay in a sector before moving to next. for a 120 x 12 degrees sector or a 4 bar raster scan. The total beam sector is 160 beams which for that dwell time can be completed in 3.2 seconds. That's the time frame or scan time. Target RCS is 5 sqm as customary. The equation is based on K.Barton's radar equation for modern radar. Result is as follows : R50% : 150 km R90% : 83 km Looks reasonable i think, particularly to engage using MICA RF or IR. Larger targets e.g Bomber with 16 sqm can be engaged further (R90 :111 km) or at maximum instrumented range. mirage 2000-5 cockpit https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA310523.pdf 1
Swan37 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 M-2000-5 is great idea. 1 RAZBAM confflict and end of develop M-2000C. 2 it will improve the variety. New expirience with MICAs and doritos aeroplane) 1
F-2 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 20 minutes ago, Swan37 said: M-2000-5 is great idea. 1 RAZBAM confflict and end of develop M-2000C. 2 it will improve the variety. New expirience with MICAs and doritos aeroplane) I’m not 100% sure but I think some of them can still uses 530D as well.
F-2 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 4 minutes ago, MAXsenna said: The "both" option is missing. Honestly I didn’t even know there were two seat Mirage 2000 5 1
bies Posted March 29 Posted March 29 I like 2-seaters when it's essential for their combat effectiveness, like strike aircrafts, long range interceptors, helicopters, trainers. But compromising performance of lightweight, agile fighter like Mirage 2000 or F-16 or MiG-29? No. 1
MAXsenna Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Honestly I didn’t even know there were two seat Mirage 2000 5 Same! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk I like 2-seaters when it's essential for their combat effectiveness, like strike aircrafts, long range interceptors, helicopters, trainers. But compromising performance of lightweight, agile fighter like Mirage 2000 or F-16 or MiG-29? No.Me like options! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
MirageEnjoyer Posted March 30 Posted March 30 The real answer is the 2000D. Pair it with the Afghanistan map, and I will be in heaven.
upyr1 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 20 hours ago, MAXsenna said: The "both" option is missing. yes. 1
Logan54 Posted March 31 Author Posted March 31 This is multi choice voting And this is 2 seater 2k-5 that is using by HAF: 1
F-2 Posted March 31 Posted March 31 Master thesis https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/12650/ AIAA paper https://www.icas.org/icas_archive/ICAS1984/ICAS-84-4.5.1.pdf
Recommended Posts