Maduce Posted May 24 Posted May 24 I had developed a mission with naval units on the north side of the map. Some of the units are no longer on the map. You can see mission routes that go off the map on the north side of the map. Just my observations. I am sure in as the next phases are developed and implemented the map will expand north, at least, I hope. Naval ops are pretty important. 2
dscalora Posted May 26 Posted May 26 I am in the same situation, my CVBG doesn't show up on the map- but it is still there I can fly over it and everything is where it is supposed to be. 2
Darcaem Posted May 26 Posted May 26 Yep, I've just noticed that myself when I couldn't find some of my late activation groups Maybe this is part of the optimization? Denmark was totally plain and unusable anyway (at least to my liking), and not part of the map on its current phase 2
Nealius Posted June 3 Posted June 3 We've only got 62nm with which to utilize a carrier group, which is disappointing. 3
Essah Posted Tuesday at 12:59 AM Posted Tuesday at 12:59 AM Realistically you would never sail a carrier group into the North sea or the baltic. Firstly because they are too vulnerable in such small seas and secondly because there is no reason to place a carrier group when you might as well just fly from adjacent land bases that are unsinkable. 2
MAXsenna Posted Tuesday at 04:40 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:40 AM 3 hours ago, Essah said: Realistically you would never sail a carrier group into the North sea Probably true! 3 hours ago, Essah said: or the baltic. Can't be done, so there's that.
draconus Posted Tuesday at 07:17 AM Posted Tuesday at 07:17 AM 5 hours ago, Essah said: you might as well just fly from adjacent land bases that are unsinkable Carrier is a moving target. Land base is as easy as put the coords into the ballistic missile. 1 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 MiG-29A F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
QuiGon Posted Tuesday at 07:19 AM Posted Tuesday at 07:19 AM 2 hours ago, MAXsenna said: Can't be done, so there's that. Why not? Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
drPhibes Posted Tuesday at 08:28 AM Posted Tuesday at 08:28 AM They would have to pass under the Øresund bridge, which has 57m of clearence. That might be an issue (I have no idea how tall the superstructure of a modern carrier is). 1
draconus Posted Tuesday at 08:58 AM Posted Tuesday at 08:58 AM 28 minutes ago, drPhibes said: I have no idea how tall the superstructure of a modern carrier is It's over 74m for Nimitz class. 1 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 MiG-29A F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
QuiGon Posted Tuesday at 12:23 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:23 PM (edited) 3 hours ago, drPhibes said: They would have to pass under the Øresund bridge, which has 57m of clearence. That might be an issue (I have no idea how tall the superstructure of a modern carrier is). Hmm, the superstructure of the Queen Elizabeth carriers has a height of 56m. That almost seems like it was designed like this intentionally Edited Tuesday at 12:25 PM by QuiGon 2 Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
AndyJWest Posted Tuesday at 01:29 PM Posted Tuesday at 01:29 PM (edited) The maximum draft for passing through the Sound (where the Øresund bridge is) is 7.2 m. A CVN (11.3 m draft) would have run aground before it got there. https://www.sjofartsverket.se/en/services/pilotage/deep-sea-pilot/ 1 hour ago, QuiGon said: Hmm, the superstructure of the Queen Elizabeth carriers has a height of 56m. That almost seems like it was designed like this intentionally Same issue as above (QE's are 11 m draft) Edited Tuesday at 01:31 PM by AndyJWest 2
QuiGon Posted Tuesday at 02:22 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:22 PM 53 minutes ago, AndyJWest said: The maximum draft for passing through the Sound (where the Øresund bridge is) is 7.2 m. A CVN (11.3 m draft) would have run aground before it got there. https://www.sjofartsverket.se/en/services/pilotage/deep-sea-pilot/ Same issue as above (QE's are 11 m draft) Ah, bummer 1 Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
MAXsenna Posted Tuesday at 02:37 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:37 PM Ah, bummerYup! As the others have already said, either the bridges are to low, or the water depth too shallow, whether you're traversing Øresund, Storebælt or Lillebælt. The Oslo-Kiel ferry can barely do it under Storebælt. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk Why not?The shiplanes goes mostly through Storebælt if I'm not mistaken. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
plott1964 Posted Tuesday at 02:40 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:40 PM So... we digress. Go back to the original premise. Is the map actually smaller than it used to be? 1 PC specs: Intel Core i7-13700K [Raptor Lake 3.4GHz Sixteen-Core LGA 1700] (stock clock)/64.0 GB RAM/RTX 3080 GPU (stock clock)/Windows 10 Home/Multiple M.2 SSD Drives/T.Flight HOTAS X/HP Reverb G2
Minsky Posted Tuesday at 08:54 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:54 PM (edited) 6 hours ago, plott1964 said: So... we digress. Go back to the original premise. Is the map actually smaller than it used to be? I don't think so. They just reduced the boundaries in the Mission Editor to prevent people from seeing too much of the low fidelity, not-yet-ready area. The "land", if you can call it that, is still there. Edited Tuesday at 08:55 PM by Minsky 1 Dima | My DCS uploads
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now