T-2 Buckeye, T-38 Talon and Su25-UTG

[Zeagle]

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

[sirrah]

Who do you mean by "we"? 

 

Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.

[Rudel_chw]

4 hours ago, Zeagle said:

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

 

There are two community Mods for the T-38 currently in development:

 

 

 

 

[AeriaGloria]

5 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

I don’t think UTG supported any armament

[Silver_Dragon]

6 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

Remember the C-101EB (1980), L-39ZA/ZO (1976/1978), MB-339A (1979) has cold war trainers and L-39 was the main Red (Warsaw pact) trainer on the Cold War. About a T-2 (UsNavy) (1958) and T-38 (USAF) (1961) missing only about as USA trainers.

[Zeagle]

21 hours ago, sirrah said:

Who do you mean by "we"? 

 

Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.

Some of us come from real world aviation. We love to fly. Period. It's not about a game.   

Maybe you should read the rules for this section before posting.

20 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Remember the C-101EB (1980), L-39ZA/ZO (1976/1978), MB-339A (1979) has cold war trainers and L-39 was the main Red (Warsaw pact) trainer on the Cold War. About a T-2 (UsNavy) (1958) and T-38 (USAF) (1961) missing only about as USA trainers.

You are absolutely correct Dragon. I just want a T-2 for historical and sentimental reasons. As for the Su25, maybe ED can find the means to do a full fidelity module one day before I am too old to fly it.

[Zeagle]

20 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:

I don’t think UTG supported any armament

I don't actually know. It would just be cool to have a naval Su25.  Maybe one day.

[AeriaGloria]

Like it doesn’t have a laser. And all pictures show it’s 4 pylons only used for fuel tanks 

[Zeagle]

Well it only had fuel tanks because it was used in initial carrier trials. They don't usually put weapons on for that. That comes later. 

[sirrah]

1 hour ago, Zeagle said:

Some of us come from real world aviation. We love to fly. Period. It's not about a game.   

Maybe you should read the rules for this section before posting.

In your OP you said "we need cold war trainers"

I responded that perhaps you meant to say that "you" wish for additional trainers.

I (and many community members with me) don't need any more cold war trainers in DCS and rather see the effort spend elsewhere.

No forum rules broken as far as I can tell.

Good luck with your wish mate  

[Silver_Dragon]

1 hour ago, Zeagle said:

Well it only had fuel tanks because it was used in initial carrier trials. They don't usually put weapons on for that. That comes later. 

Rusian dont build new versions about Kutnesov Su-25 UBK carrier capable, that has only carry fuel tanks and gun removed. On fact, the only "weapon capable" carrier trainer was de Mig-29KUBR from 2016

Edited 2 hours ago by Silver_Dragon