T-2 Buckeye, T-38 Talon and Su25-UTG

[Zeagle]

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

[sirrah]

Who do you mean by "we"? 

 

Just in case you had the illusion to speak on behalf of the entire community: I certainly do not "need" any trainer module in DCS.

[Rudel_chw]

4 hours ago, Zeagle said:

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

 

There are two community Mods for the T-38 currently in development:

 

 

 

 

[AeriaGloria]

5 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

I don’t think UTG supported any armament

[Silver_Dragon]

6 hours ago, Zeagle said:

 

We need cold war trainers, particularly the T-2 and T-38.

The Su25-UTG would be a great addition to REDFOR. It was produced in small numbers. But it would provide for a REDFOR all-weather strike / carrier training capability.

Remember the C-101EB (1980), L-39ZA/ZO (1976/1978), MB-339A (1979) has cold war trainers and L-39 was the main Red (Warsaw pact) trainer on the Cold War. About a T-2 (UsNavy) (1958) and T-38 (USAF) (1961) missing only about as USA trainers.