razo+r Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 90% of this video is complaining about textures. Not sure if that really makes it worth a look. 5 2
buceador Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 2 hours ago, razo+r said: 90% of this video is complaining about textures. Not sure if that really makes it worth a look. I agree that complaining about textures 'doesn't make it worth a look' however it's always useful to check a variety of reviews, especially for those people 'on the fence' about purchasing it. 1
AusGoose Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago The author was kind enough to say they might not know what they are talking about. There are differing perspectives on this subect on youtube, including from people who have actually flown a C-130. 1
H60MTI Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Here's another review of the C-130J from an actual C-130 driver. I haven't made it through the whole video yet, but I'll put it up anyway. 2 Former SSG US Army UH-60A/L/M Crewchief "2 To Fly!"
TheBiggerBass Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago vor 4 Stunden schrieb razo+r: 90% of this video is complaining about textures. Not sure if that really makes it worth a look. It's just the 1st release and I'd be surpised to see it perfect. There will definetely follow further releases. System: HP Z2 Tower, Win11 24H2, i9-14900K, 64GB RAM, 8TB SSD (M2) + 18TB HDD (Sata), GeForce RTX4070 TI Super 16GB VRAM, Samsung Odyssey 57" curved monitor (main screen) + BenQ 32" UW3270 (secondary screen), VKB Gunfighter Ultimate MK4 + S-TECS Throttle DCS: All terrains, allmost all modules, most user flyable mods - CA, WWII Assets
Gunfreak Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago As many in the comments on the first video says. This is just rage bate. All reviews are of course personal opinions to some degree. But that guy states falsehood. Claiming its basically the same as the free mod etc. 3 i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 5090 OC, 128Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
Q3ark Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 5 hours ago, buceador said: Worth a look... I watched this earlier, the guy is just offering a negative viewpoint to get views, it’s definitely rage bait. Also his camera work is rage inducing by itself. 3 1
razo+r Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, buceador said: I agree that complaining about textures 'doesn't make it worth a look' however it's always useful to check a variety of reviews, especially for those people 'on the fence' about purchasing it. Sure, I agree, it's important to look at different people's opinion on it. However, when I watch a review, I expect a review of the full product of all different aspects, in this case graphics, flight model, system modeling etc. This guy only rants about textures and a bit of flight model of which he has no idea of (me neither, to be fair). So for me this does not qualify as a review but more as a 20 minute rant about the same thing over and over again. 3
winnergeel Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Doesn’t look at a single system. ”I don’t think it should fly like this” - not a C130 pilot Yes a real quality review. 1
Nighthwk Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago This video makes me laugh. We totally could've made the rivets 8k so they'd be crystal clear, and it probably would've looked awesome for people with 32 GB of vram. Everyone else would not be able to run the plane. 1 airplanesimulations.com
Recommended Posts