Boberro Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 It is said above 25-30 FPS human eye can't see more... but your brain somehow catch difference example 60 vs 30... so.... to be sure set for 60 FPS. Personally I feel very comfortable at 30 FPS. For me it is smooth. Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Necroscope Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 It is said above 25-30 FPS human eye can't see more... but your brain somehow catch difference example 60 vs 30... so.... to be sure set for 60 FPS. Personally I feel very comfortable at 30 FPS. For me it is smooth. Common opinion is - brain can't "see" more than 24, eye - can. Number 60 is rised in CRT times, when with 60Hz refresh rate you was able to see flickering, in case of CRT nature. Всех убью, один останусь!
Boberro Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 In 60 my eyes were bleeding... :P I had to work at minimum 85-100 in CRT times :D Anyway I tested in LO1 few FPS values and I was happy at 30 at all. Maybe it was temporary, maybe later I'd like to get 60 FPS in v-sync, dunno. Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Steel Jaw Posted December 27, 2010 Author Posted December 27, 2010 Gona try forcing 60 with vsinc on. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Weaponz248 Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 I get about 35 to 40 FPS with Vsync on. Im assuming that with the final build it will be better. I definatly saw a big improvement with BETA 4.
Weaponz248 Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 Great discussion. Need some hot babe pics though...heh...:D Im gonna play around with the FPS number BUT what is the generally agreed upon FPS number that the human eye needs for smooth play? Did someone say hot babes?????:cheer3nc:
CarneyUK Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 An interesting read on what the human eye actually sees!! http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm and for hot chicks....this is one on my motorbike!!! http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=52237&page=4&highlight=bikes check out post 33 "The sky is not the limit.....it's my playground!!" @paraglidecass
Callsign.Vega Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 Lol to the person who said you cant see more than 30 FPS. 30 FPS looks like utter crap. I can easily tell the difference between a 120FPS screen and a 60 FPS screen. Let alone a measly 30 FPS. I try and get a minimum of 60 FPS. If I need to turn down graphics settings to achieve that, so be it. FPS > eye candy. GPU: RTX 4090 - 3,000 MHz core / 12,000 MHz VRAM. CPU: 7950X3d - 5.2 GHz X3d, 5.8 GHz secondary / MB: ASUS Crosshair X670E Gene / RAM: G.Skill 48GB 6400 MHz SSD: Intel Optane P5800X - 800GB VR: Pimax Crystal CONTROLS: VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Base / VPC Constellation ALPHA Prime Grip / VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle / TM Pendular Rudders
JHepburn Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 This is a common misconception in computer gaming. This does apply to TV, movies, etc. because they use motion blur to smooth between frames. In computer games there is no motion blur, and therefore the eye can distinguish between much higher framerates. I'm sure there is some point that the eye can no longer tell, but it's much higher than typical movie framerates. ...and I do fly at 30 fps, and I think it looks fine :)
Weaponz248 Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 If I dont have the FPS numbers up than I honestly cant distiguish unless its really low and becomes a slide show. Otherwise as long as its moving and playing good i'm happy.
hassata Posted December 27, 2010 Posted December 27, 2010 Refresh rate at 75, max fps at 39 keeps fps at the max specified for me. I can definitely tell the difference between 30 and higher. Wish I could keep it pegged at 60. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
CarneyUK Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Refresh rate at 75, max fps at 39 keeps fps at the max specified for me. I can definitely tell the difference between 30 and higher. Wish I could keep it pegged at 60. With a refresh rate of 60, I would need it locked at 60fps or ?? (how do I work it out?) "The sky is not the limit.....it's my playground!!" @paraglidecass
hassata Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 if you enable vsync in the graphics config, the fps will be pegged at 60. If you use the max fps line, you can set max fps lower. I chose 39 because it hardly hits that with cockpit and in built up areas (including airports), and anything above 30 is smooth to me. That way you leave cpu overhead to do other things. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Steel Jaw Posted December 28, 2010 Author Posted December 28, 2010 That way you leave cpu overhead to do other things. What "other things" would those be? "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Steel Jaw Posted December 28, 2010 Author Posted December 28, 2010 Locked at 60...with my new overclocked GPU, my rig is eating a maxed out A10C for breakfast. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
genbrien Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Locked at 60...with my new overclocked GPU, my rig is eating a maxed out A10C for breakfast. what was you ex GPU? how much FPS did you gain ? I'm a bit off topic but I'm wondering if switching my 4870 512mb for a 6950 2gb will do a difference at 1920x1080 all HIGH with at least 4aa :helpsmilie: Do you think that getting 9 women pregnant will get you a baby in 1 month?[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Mobo: Asus P8P67 deluxe Monitor: Lg 22'' 1920*1080 CPU: i7 2600k@ 4.8Ghz +Zalman CNPS9900 max Keyboard: Logitech G15 GPU:GTX 980 Strix Mouse: Sidewinder X8 PSU: Corsair TX750w Gaming Devices: Saytek X52, TrackIr5 RAM: Mushkin 2x4gb ddr3 9-9-9-24 @1600mhz Case: 690 SSD: Intel X25m 80gb
hassata Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 What "other things" would those be? AI calculations? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Steel Jaw Posted December 28, 2010 Author Posted December 28, 2010 Had a 9800GTX running A10C on medium settings with stuttering ~35 FPS. Now a EVGA 470 GTX massively overclocked and getting 60 FPS (locked) all settings maxed except draw distance @medium, no stuttering. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Weaponz248 Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 Had a 9800GTX running A10C on medium settings with stuttering ~35 FPS. Now a EVGA 470 GTX massively overclocked and getting 60 FPS (locked) all settings maxed except draw distance @medium, no stuttering. Well sweet that answered that question. I have 2 9800 GTs. And I was leaning towards getting a EVGA GTX 580. The only problem was I wasnt sure how one card would perform instead of 2 but I think once I get my tax return and convince the wifey I will be getting a new graphic card and possible a new HOTAS!!!!
Steel Jaw Posted December 28, 2010 Author Posted December 28, 2010 Check out the EVGA cards. A 480 can overclock to 500 specs, my 470 is o/c to a 480: stock 607 clock now @750 (!). "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Druid_ Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 or get yourself a AMD HD6950 and turn it into a HD6970 for free http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/overclocking/vidcard/159 i7-7700K : 16Gb DDR4 2800 Mhz : Asus Mobo : 2TB HDD : Intel 520 SSD 240gb : RTX 2080ti: Win10 64pro : Dx10 : TrackiR4 : TM Warthog : ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
Weaponz248 Posted December 30, 2010 Posted December 30, 2010 Had ATI card before. It was a great card but I like Nvidia's setup better. Just personal preference.
Recommended Posts