Mike Busutil Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 I hear he broke a lot of windows that day.... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Checkout my user files here: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/filter/user-is-Mike Busutil/apply/
Spadje Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 in that video it looks like it has the blue angel markings.... AMD Ryzen 9 3900x, 64GB DDR 4, MSI Ventus 2070 Super, Samsung 970 M.2 NVMe, WD Blue 512GB SSD, TM Warthog, CH Pro Pedals, Acer AH101 WMR
Guest Cayenne Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) PhotoChopped, The Bug has direct sunlight shadows and the condos appear to bit lit by overcast skys, depth of field dosn't look correct either.. Been computing and simming since 1982 and I have never anticipated a fix, patch, update, or service release as much as I have for DCS A-10!! If you don't count the Windows 3.1 to present RTM vers. I paid for and still waiting for... Edited February 9, 2011 by Cayenne append
Spadje Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Here is the link http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/16/f18-buzzes-detroit-apartm_n_234853.html so I do believe it is true..... and another link to full story http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/07/picture-this-f-18-buzzes-detroit-apartment/ AMD Ryzen 9 3900x, 64GB DDR 4, MSI Ventus 2070 Super, Samsung 970 M.2 NVMe, WD Blue 512GB SSD, TM Warthog, CH Pro Pedals, Acer AH101 WMR
Steel Jaw Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 This banter is useless, please gimme beta 6 so I can eject from this. 1 "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
wickedfastball Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) I hear he broke a lot of windows that day.... That is from Fleet Week, I believe. San Francisco bay. Pretty cool event if you can ever make it.... Edited February 9, 2011 by wickedfastball Youtube comments say the same thing, FWIW
LukeSky Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) . Edited February 9, 2011 by LukeSky [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 64bit, Core I7 950, Nvidia GTX 260, 6 gig RAM, TIR 5, Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals, Logitech attack3 :(
Slammin Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 This banter is useless, please gimme beta 6 so I can eject from this. You do realize that for each time I read a whine like this, your Karma is getting lower scores? You'll get beta 6. Maybe beta 7 too. Should we expect the same whine when we wait for beta 8? Seriously, what about beta 4 is making everyone so fricken nuts? I having a helluva time with b4 right now and STILL have not read the entire manual. Abit IN9 32x MAX- Kentsfield QX6700 @3520 1.5 vcore watercooled D-Tek Fuzion/PA-160/MCR120/2x MCP655 2x2GB G-Skill 1066 5-5-5-15 2T@1.9vdimm 2x EVGA 580GTX 1.5GB SLI 2x 74GB Sata Raptor Raid0 2x 320GB Hitachi Sata II X-FI Elite Pro Dell U3011 Lian Li V2100B Corsair HX1000
GreenGriffon Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 PhotoChopped, The Bug has direct sunlight shadows and the condos appear to bit lit by overcast skys, depth of field dosn't look correct either.. Actually, it's a real photo. Photographers can still manage to capture an amazing picture once in awhile.
GGTharos Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 And yet it is accredited to a real photographer snapping it for a real magazine or newspaper. None of it is photoshopped - once more, keep amateur 'photoshop' accusations off this forum ;) [ATTACH]47432[/ATTACH]PhotoChopped, The Bug has direct sunlight shadows and the condos appear to bit lit by overcast skys, depth of field dosn't look correct either.. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
BoneDust Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Seriously, what about beta 4 is making everyone so fricken nuts? I having a helluva time with b4 right now and STILL have not read the entire manual. Some of us can't run beta 4 :mad: Alienware New Aurora R15 | Windows® 11 Home Premium | 64bit, 13thGen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9 13900KF(24-Core, 68MB| NVIDIA(R) GeForce RTX(TM) 4090, 24GB GDDR6X | 1 X 2TB SSD, 1X 1TB SSD | 64GB, 2x32GB, DDR5, 4800MHz | 1350W PSU, Alienware Cryo-tech (TM) Edition CPU Liquid Cooling power supply | Pimax Crystal VR
Slammin Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Some of us can't run beta 4 :mad: Really? I'd do my best to assist you if you can't because B4 is a pretty huge simulation - complete or not. Hopefully you can at least run any of the previous betas because as long as I've been running them, they all challenge me. I really haven't been affected by many of the the bugs that have been addressed after beta3 because I've been just so focused on learning the aircraft and systems (I think I purchased during B2). Maybe it was B1. No matter. Huge study sim, with lots to experience. Lots to learn. But if you are missing all this, you are really missing something special. I have not been this 'into' it since buying FalconX? with 3-ring binder doc. I actually feel like I need to dig that book out of the closet now because of DSC A-10. Maybe I should re-read some of my old Jane's title docs too because back then, it seemed a lot of the sim docs included more than just the button functions, they also included lessons and docs on how to survive. MAKE your system happy with the beta's if you can. 1 Abit IN9 32x MAX- Kentsfield QX6700 @3520 1.5 vcore watercooled D-Tek Fuzion/PA-160/MCR120/2x MCP655 2x2GB G-Skill 1066 5-5-5-15 2T@1.9vdimm 2x EVGA 580GTX 1.5GB SLI 2x 74GB Sata Raptor Raid0 2x 320GB Hitachi Sata II X-FI Elite Pro Dell U3011 Lian Li V2100B Corsair HX1000
-NFlight- Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Then, there was Amy from next door, who was the KC-135. --never could persuade her to connect. :blink: Uh... ~wince~ I would rather that Amy be the A-10 and >I< was the KC-135... I mean... boom and all. (think about it) 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Win7 x64, Intel i7-970 6 Core, 12GB, ATI 5970, TrackIR 5 w/Clip, TM Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals
-NFlight- Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 I see it and the angles of the shadows line up. Please, keep the amateur 'photoshop' shouting for some other place. Zoom lens... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Win7 x64, Intel i7-970 6 Core, 12GB, ATI 5970, TrackIR 5 w/Clip, TM Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals
Zomba Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 As a photographer and one of those despised photoshoppers I can suggest that it is not advisable to use apparent shadow angles as a reliable indicator to whether or not an image is a comp job or not. Different surfaces may be at different angles than they appear and can strike shadows that don't seem right and may lead you to draw incorrect conclusions. If they are out by miles which some very sharp and others diffuse, then maybe then, but generally don't bet the house just on shadows. A famous case of this is some of the Apollo moon landing photos having odd shadows leading some over enthusiastic conspiracy theorists to believe they where being lite by poorly set up stage lights in a studio. Where in fact it was case of rising and falling ground that wasn't apparent in the photo causing the shadows to diverge and/or converge. 1 I don't test for bugs, but when I do I do it in production.
Mike Busutil Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 ^+1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Checkout my user files here: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/filter/user-is-Mike Busutil/apply/
hog_driver111th Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Uh... ~wince~ I would rather that Amy be the A-10 and >I< was the KC-135... I mean... boom and all. (think about it) I had the same thought when I read his statement... but then I thought "what if he were flying around in something like a Hornet or Tomcat, or even Intruder with his boom constantly sticking out. Then Amy could be a KC-135 with the basket and he would then need to plug the boom in..." well, I'm sure you get the idea, hehe. A-10C - FC3 - CA - L-39 - UH1 - P-51 - Hawk - BS2 - F-86 - Gazelle - F-5E - AV8B - F/A-18C i5-4590 - GTX 1060 - Oculus CV1 - TM:Warthog [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic9979_1.gif[/sIGPIC]
StrongHarm Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 I think you're barkin up the wrong tree pal. Mower's one of the good guys. Always helpful courteous and up beat. I believe that what you see as a whine is just purposely exaggerated urgency. I'm with you though.. as illustrated here. That is not.. repeat.. not your target Echo 1.. eyes on village idiots at another thread, 180 for 10. You're cleared to engage. You do realize that for each time I read a whine like this, your Karma is getting lower scores? You'll get beta 6. Maybe beta 7 too. Should we expect the same whine when we wait for beta 8? Seriously, what about beta 4 is making everyone so fricken nuts? I having a helluva time with b4 right now and STILL have not read the entire manual. It's a good thing that this is Early Access and we've all volunteered to help test and enhance this work in progress... despite the frustrations inherent in the task with even the simplest of software... otherwise people might not understand that this incredibly complex unfinished module is unfinished. /light-hearted sarcasm
dotChuckles Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 And yet it is accredited to a real photographer snapping it for a real magazine or newspaper. None of it is photoshopped - once more, keep amateur 'photoshop' accusations off this forum ;) I concur... As someone who has worked with photoshop for a living in a post production environment for over 10 years. I can conclude that this is not a fake. Trust me... I have done some very convincing photoshop fakery for campaigns in the past - but this is not one of them. The noise and grain across mid-tones are a perfect match between the building and the aircraft. Aliasing on the railings of the balcony perfectly integrate with the background and show no signs of cloning or any artifacts that would indicate the insertion behind of a background plate. The edges on the Hornet are perfect, no feathering from cropping out. Also, difference analysis across the whole image fail to show up any feathering in the sky gradient from an inserted plate. This combined with the providence of the journalist and publication... I conclude the image is genuine. And all that analysis certainly provided a great way to kill a few hours on a slow afternoon at work while waiting for beta 6. ;-) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
StrongHarm Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Call me skeptical, but I think my wife is just a photoshoped impostor. Those couldn't be real. Also, if you look at her left eye in the light there's a errant pixel. I've thought about working with the contrast and turning her into a sweaty sultry Puerto Rican. It's a good thing that this is Early Access and we've all volunteered to help test and enhance this work in progress... despite the frustrations inherent in the task with even the simplest of software... otherwise people might not understand that this incredibly complex unfinished module is unfinished. /light-hearted sarcasm
Steel Jaw Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 I am losing faith...help me... So here's a picture of my favorite babe... "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Heater Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 @ Mower... is the Beta 6 Version of the GAME out yet :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] System: Windows 10 (64 bit) 64 GB Memory CPU i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz GTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition HTC VIVE
Steel Jaw Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 @ Mower... is the Beta 6 Version of the GAME out yet :) *sigh* I got better things to do than wait on beta 6... "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
StrongHarm Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 We must have been hit by the same Photoshopper.. that looks a lot like my wife. (strangely true) I am losing faith...help me... So here's a picture of my favorite babe... Call me skeptical, but I think my wife is just a photoshoped impostor. Those couldn't be real. Also, if you look at her left eye in the light there's a errant pixel. I've thought about working with the contrast and turning her into a sweaty sultry Puerto Rican. It's a good thing that this is Early Access and we've all volunteered to help test and enhance this work in progress... despite the frustrations inherent in the task with even the simplest of software... otherwise people might not understand that this incredibly complex unfinished module is unfinished. /light-hearted sarcasm
StrongHarm Posted February 9, 2011 Posted February 9, 2011 Guess I'd better cough up the proof before the flames occur. It's a good thing that this is Early Access and we've all volunteered to help test and enhance this work in progress... despite the frustrations inherent in the task with even the simplest of software... otherwise people might not understand that this incredibly complex unfinished module is unfinished. /light-hearted sarcasm
Recommended Posts