I'm rooting for the success of dcs , become a major producer

[Voodoo-chacal]

I'm rooting for the success of dcs become a major producer;

then they will be able to develop new modules AFM at a speed much more quickly

 

 

( ( ( how nice it would be able to buy new modules AFM every two months ! ! ! ) ) ) :thumbup:

 

( ( ( My greatest desire is to have the modules apache ah-64D and F-16C ) ) )

 

:pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly:

Edited May 5, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal

[cichlidfan]

I'm rooting for the success of dcs , become a major producer;

then they will be able to develop new modules AFM at a speed much more quickly

 

 

( ( ( how nice it would be able to buy new modules AFM every two months ! ! ! ) ) ) :thumbup:

 

 

I don't think any size organization could release AFM aircraft every two months unless most of the work had already been done long beforehand.

[Voodoo-chacal]

I don't think any size organization could release AFM aircraft every two months unless most of the work had already been done long beforehand.

 

 

I do not think you're right :book:

 

 

the more people work on the same-project, had been ready faster

Edited May 5, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal

[Flagrum]

I do not think you're right :book:

 

 

the more people work on the same-project, had been ready faster

So .... do you also believe that more pregnant women give birth to their childs quicker? Like 9 pregnant women ... and one month later, the child is there? :megalol:

[Voodoo-chacal]

So .... do you also believe that more pregnant women give birth to their childs quicker? Like 9 pregnant women ... and one month later, the child is there? :megalol:

 

 

funny lol :doh:

Edited May 5, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal

[Robert1983NL]

Nah, DCS is fine as it is. We don't need modules for the masses. We don't need the masses to come on the servers. We need serious players and realistic modules. Just like it is now.

 

ED could try to do some advertising though, to draw more and serious players.

[Voodoo-chacal]

Nah, DCS is fine as it is. We don't need modules for the masses. We don't need the masses to come on the servers. We need serious players and realistic modules. Just like it is now.

 

ED could try to do some advertising though, to draw more and serious players.

 

his conservative opinion is ridiculous ,what is your age ? is old man 70 years ?

[Robert1983NL]

lol, seriously??

 

Conservative, seriously?

 

Come on dude, you can't be serious.

[Voodoo-chacal]

lol, seriously??

 

Conservative, seriously?

 

Come on dude, you can't be serious.

 

I want all modules regardless of who will play , update concepts, we are in 2013

Edited May 6, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal

[Kameni]

It is still a question why ED doesn't pay someone to do localization to chinese, since they: A: Have a larg number of active players, and B: Are the nation that is biggest in numbers AND THEY LIKE PLANES! ;)

Want money? Go chinese. :D

[leafer]

We also want quality. :P I think cichlidfan is right in that quantity doesn't necessarily equate to quality when it comes to computer programming. Right? I'm sure ED can use more manpower but how many can you assign to a task before it stops becoming efficient?

[Hellfire257]

Too many cooks and all that. Unless OP means parallel development, that is.

[aaron886]

I do not think you're right :book:

 

 

the more people work on the same-project, had been ready faster

 

This is uninformed. You should dial back your expectations or prepare to be disappointed...

[leafer]

Now if they can afford to assign to each of those jets its own team.

[Kuky]

Quality over Quantity any day for me ;)

 

Not to mention, your wallet (if you are buying these modules with your own and not your parent's money) will be crying if it had to shell out $40-50 every two months... or your wife (if you are married) if you were spending this much on sim every two months (this is beside all the PC and peripherals we spend on our hobby)... and lets not forget you would not be able to fly all the DCS modules if you were changing them so quick as you wouldn't be able to master/learn any of them... or appreciate the depth of simulation of each DCS aircraft.... 'nuf said :D

[whitehot]

his conservative opinion is ridiculous ,what is your age ? is old man 70 years ?

 

conservative?

seems pretty much the other way around to me

[Datajack]

Thank you ED

 

Just wanted to say thank you to Wags and the ED team for all the hard work they've put into DCS. The decision to go with the DCS World model and allow 3rd party developers access to DCS was a great one. One that is already bearing fruit with DCS: Huey. I would also like to thank them for keeping us all more informed with the new updates. DCS F15C and DCS Su27 are exciting modules that I look forward to. Personally I'm looking forward to both the F/A-18C and E models. It's just a matter of time before we see both of those. The future looks very bright for us sim fans! Thanks ED!

 

Datajack

[Robert1983NL]

I want all modules regardless of who will play , update concepts, we are in 2013

 

Lol, you're funny!

 

It's great for you that you don't care about quality. I do, so that's why I disagree with you. Has nothing to do with conservatism and 2013 lmao! :D

[Voodoo-chacal]

Quality over Quantity any day for me ;)

 

Not to mention, your wallet (if you are buying these modules with your own and not your parent's money) will be crying if it had to shell out $40-50 every two months... or your wife (if you are married) if you were spending this much on sim every two months (this is beside all the PC and peripherals we spend on our hobby)... and lets not forget you would not be able to fly all the DCS modules if you were changing them so quick as you wouldn't be able to master/learn any of them... or appreciate the depth of simulation of each DCS aircraft.... 'nuf said :D

 

I work to get my money

 

Here in Brazil a big pizza costs $ 18. DCS module costs = 2 big pizza + coca-cola.

 

actually I just want the modules F-16, AH-64D, F-22

 

I like just modern planes

 

i buy only modern aircraft

 

i do not buy the old planes

[LexiconG2]

I don't think any size organization could release AFM aircraft every two months unless most of the work had already been done long beforehand.

 

It could be hard and there is not always accurate information to even make a AFM think of a F-22 or F-35 the specs are secret. Having a passion and working in a smaller group could be an advantage. ED should be making some good money now so hope they can get into some deeper projects. For sure either way time is always going to be the case for AFM.

[Voodoo-chacal]

We also want quality. :P I think cichlidfan is right in that quantity doesn't necessarily equate to quality when it comes to computer programming. Right? I'm sure ED can use more manpower but how many can you assign to a task before it stops becoming efficient?

 

what are you talking about?

have you ever thought about studying a bit about management?

 

they may have several teams working on several projects simultaneously and maintaining the same quality DCS

[LexiconG2]

what are you talking about?

have you ever thought about studying a bit about management?

 

they may have several teams working on several projects simultaneously and maintaining the same quality DCS

 

Its about cost right now for ED. Maybe they are making good money and don't want to have to pay other teams internally (I have studied management)... This is why they are making DCS World free as a SDK and demo then making a new engine so they can have 3rd parties make aircraft and still get some profits as well from those 3rd party sales they do know what they are doing. ;-) It's not always about hard work it's about making your software work hard for you. 3rd party dev is the best thing for this project right now.

Edited May 6, 2013 by LexiconG2

[Voodoo-chacal]

It could be hard and there is not always accurate information to even make a AFM think of a F-22 or F-35 the specs are secret. Having a passion and working in a smaller group could be an advantage. ED should be making some good money now so hope they can get into some deeper projects. For sure either way time is always going to be the case for AFM.

 

DCS Do not purchase third party projects. hire employees with a salary.

the world has many programmers working for monthly wages ...

Edited May 6, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal

[leafer]

what are you talking about?

have you ever thought about studying a bit about management?

 

they may have several teams working on several projects simultaneously and maintaining the same quality DCS

 

You might want to read my post again.

[LexiconG2]

DCS Do not purchase third party projects. hire employees with a salary.

the world has many programmers working for monthly wages ...

 

 

No but third parties have to pay DCS to market and sell their addons. So a precentage of what 3rd parties make from sales goes to DCS. ;-)

Edited May 7, 2013 by LexiconG2