All Activity

Hello everyone, sorry for asking, but i cant find the option for activate external fuel tanks. The CL tank (Pylon7) cant selected only for smokegenerators. What did i wrong?

Pretty much that, does anyone had success modding that?. I have tried multiple times with shaders and luas but nothing seems to work. It would be great to extend overall resolution and quality rendering distance. thanks.

Понятно что ничего не понятно. Но несколько роликов от одного автора показывают что: 1. систему можно включить и выключить в полёте 2. при полёте на пилотаж с выключенной системой пилот после посадки отключает всё что включает её в игре

You may ask why do we need L006 signal output on radar itself, isn't it enough to disable SPO the moment when radar switch goes from EKV to On?

I think all your suggestions are very valid, however i think there should be a bit more focus on support (and maybe civilian) vehicles, structures and personnel instead of fighting vehicles. Support vehicles and crew/soldiers is what you might see up close when starting on the ramp. A tank not so much. Furthermore a handful of civilian vehicles would offer a lot of options for interesting scenarios and would maybe sell the era (date the map) more than a military vehicle could. Tbh i wouldn't find it too jarring if East Germany would field a later model T-72 as long as the camo matches. Not ideal, not terrible imho... SInce DCS is a flightsim first of all, we would def. need more bluefor SAM (should probably be Nike Hercules (?) iirc), first/second Gen MANPAD for both sides as well as time appropriate EWR/C2 and related assets for both sides. I think one or two civilian airliners (one per block) would also help a lot, especially for scenarios in which the war doesn't go hot.

No. The missile will act like it is part of the aircraft fuselage. It is 100% fixed in position. There is no motion difference between the rail and the missile as seen in MSAA. It is just a complex scene playing chaos with the temporal algorithm. It is 100% out of the hands of ED, unless a new temporal algorithm comes along globally. It is all about contrast between pixels. Tiny details that have high contrast will either disappear with motion or be reluctant to move in scenes that has ghosting. The motion on that wingtip is of high frequency as well, a nightmare for temporal anti aliasing. Same goes to the blinking HAFU for the tomcat radar screen. At certain zooms, the blinking HAFUs appear solid, same goes for the blinking countdowns when a Phoenix has reached pitbull. This effect is also seen with a fast runway absent from the background.

Ну не работает, ну и фиг с этим, отложите модуль на год, может "рассосется" и все заработает. Это не стеб, я когда после релиза решил на Апаче полетать - подгорала пятая точка, вроде должно работать, а не работает, плюнул, а через год сел, и вуаля - все работает. На англицком форуме тоже достаточно въедливых ребят, они душу вытрясут за 70 вечно зеленых у разработчиков. Так-что смените проблемный борт и наслаждайтесь игрой.

Yes That's all announced officially, I guess Rafale will fit in after that, I don't expect it sooner than 2028 tbh.

UPDATE: Reverted back to the "[13] viewAngle = 40.000000"cockpit FOV settings, with a small adjustment forward in "eyeball" position. Found that matched to the 55° external FOV, everything outside was just a little small/far away at gun and landing ranges. Marksmanship and landings suffered, for no appreciable advantage. So, tried matching 54° external FOV (increase zoom). Over-improved Marksmanship and landings, looked close, panned poorly, and the monitor frame "popped," creating that 'slit in a bucket' effect most despise. Investigated external view, and it is completely separate and arbitrary, so matching it makes no sense, RE: internal cockpit view. So, went back to the internal '40.000000' and matched that. Monitor frame faded, dogfight panning came back, and looks right/hits right/lands right is back to normal, albeit moving the 'eyeball' forward a bit, to better scale the gunsight/canopy bow position/gauge tip angle, again, better visual 'feel'. SnapViews["P-51D"] = { [1] = {-- player slot 1 [1] = {--LWin + Num0 : Snap View 0 viewAngle = 54.750000,--FOV Cockpit Zoom 54.750000, OEM 80.000000 "P-51D" viewAngleVertical= 0.000000,--VFOV hAngle = 0.000000,-- (Snap View)/(Cockpit panel view in)(-30°) vAngle = -30.00000,-- Cockpit View Angle -30.00000, OEM -9.500000 x_trans = 0.155000,-- Cockpit View In_Trans 0.155000, OEM 0.120000 y_trans = 0.060000,-- Cockpit View Up_Trans 0.060000, OEM 0.059000 z_trans = 0.000000,-- Cockpit View Rt_Trans 0.000000, OEM 0.000000 rollAngle = 0.000000, cockpit_version = 0, [13] = {--default view viewAngle = 40.000000,--FOV Cockpit Zoom 40.000000, OEM 80.000000 "P-51D" viewAngleVertical= 0.000000,--VFOV hAngle = 0.000000,-- (View Center)/(Cam View Dn-Slow)(-30°) vAngle = 0.000000,-- Cockpit View Angle 0.00000, OEM -9.500000 x_trans = 0.155000,-- Cockpit View In_Trans 0.155000, OEM 0.120000 y_trans = 0.060000,-- Cockpit View Up_Trans 0.060000, OEM 0.059000 z_trans = 0.000000,-- Cockpit View Rt_Trans 0.000000, OEM 0.000000 rollAngle = 0.000000, cockpit_version = 0, Enjoy. Bowie

I have noticed that, when George says he's engaging, but he's not, cycling the weapon type (short Left), or cycling weapons free/hold fire, usually helps.

так может в этом и дело? ЧТо они ломаются и "раздолбаи" (как говорит один эксперт из соседней темы) Не ремонтируют?)

That's surprising. I could imagine that the texture of the runway throws off the algorithm. Or maybe the missiles don't provide motion vectors correctly? Or the missiles do, but the wing doesnt? It must have something to do with motion vector differences between the rail (which is part of the aircraft mesh) and the missile (which is not). Otherwise you should see the same mismatch between wing and rail...

As title says, would like to see an option in special options for the Mig-29 to adjust percentage of throttle input for afterburner activation. Several other modules already have this. Nice QoL thing to add.

This problem also bothers me. Since the Auto-Collective function has been removed, we need to control the Collective ourselves when hovering. if the operation is not done properly, the auto-hovering will be cancelled. When you operate HOT3 at the same time, this problem is further exacerbated. I also noticed that even with good collective control, auto-hover was often disrupted by "Weird Rocking Behaviour", as GrEaSeLiTeNiN said. Reducing the load or lowering the hovering height can alleviate the problem. Or don't use the SLAVE function, so you need to operate the collective and HOT3 weapon systems and rudder at the same time when attacking the target, which is very painful for single players!Perhaps it is a manifestation of insufficient power under the new FM, or the automatic hovering function still has problems.

@BIGNEWY Reproduced. This is an actual crash (SEGFAULT / ACCESS_VIOLATION). Please move to Game Crash. Being naive and having suspended my computer while I had the DCS Mission Editor open, I accidentally triggered this crash. Full dump attached: dcs.log-20251003-120952.zip Annotated excerpt from dcs.log: # tabbing in and out, everything works prior to computer suspension 2025-10-03 11:15:20.855 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [2560, 1440] 2025-10-03 11:15:22.549 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [0, 0] 2025-10-03 11:16:57.822 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [2560, 1440] 2025-10-03 11:17:02.051 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [0, 0] 2025-10-03 11:21:16.576 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [2560, 1440] 2025-10-03 11:21:17.875 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [0, 0] ... # coming back up from suspension, the session check fails immediately 2025-10-03 12:06:56.534 ERROR ASYNCNET (2808): HTTP request dcs:checksession failed with error 6: Could not resolve hostname 2025-10-03 12:06:56.535 WARNING ASYNCNET (2808): Session check failed: -6 ... # a minute later, DCS decides to terminate, but lets me tab in and out anyway 2025-10-03 12:07:57.966 ERROR ASYNCNET (2808): The session has expired (401). Exiting... 2025-10-03 12:07:57.972 INFO EDCORE (Main): (dDispatcher)enterToState_:5 2025-10-03 12:08:38.747 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [2560, 1440] 2025-10-03 12:08:42.582 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [0, 0] 2025-10-03 12:09:42.972 INFO DXGUI_WIN_ADAPTER (Main): resize main window to [2560, 1440] 2025-10-03 12:09:48.735 INFO APP (Main): application shutdown ... # two minutes later, DCS suddenly SEGFAULTs 2025-10-03 12:09:49.196 WARNING SCENE (8972): Scene was removed with 1 alive objects 2025-10-03 12:09:49.210 INFO WorldPlugIns (Main): Deinitializing plugins... 2025-10-03 12:09:50.441 INFO TERRAIN (Main): lSystem::exit() 2025-10-03 12:09:50.443 INFO TERRAIN (Main): lSystem::CleanScenes() 2025-10-03 12:09:50.443 INFO WORLDGENERAL (Main): TerrainUtility:: updated in parallel: 0, updated in the main thread: 0 2025-10-03 12:09:50.504 INFO INTER (8972): ITerrainGraphicsEntryPoint::close() 2025-10-03 12:09:50.564 INFO INTER (Main): ITerrainEntryPoint::close() 2025-10-03 12:09:51.160 INFO INTER (Main): ITerrainGraphicsEntryPoint::close() 2025-10-03 12:09:51.160 INFO INTER (Main): ITerrainEntryPoint::close() 2025-10-03 12:09:51.161 INFO EDCORE (Main): try to write dump information 2025-10-03 12:09:51.163 WARNING SCENE (8972): Scene was removed with 5 alive objects 2025-10-03 12:09:51.271 INFO EDCORE (Main): # -------------- 20251003-120952 -------------- 2025-10-03 12:09:51.273 INFO EDCORE (Main): DCS/2.9.20.15384 (x86_64; MT; Windows NT 10.0.19045) 2025-10-03 12:09:51.275 INFO EDCORE (Main): C:\Games\DCS World OpenBeta\bin\lua.dll 2025-10-03 12:09:51.277 INFO EDCORE (Main): # C0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION at 00007ff9994817d0 00:00000000 2025-10-03 12:09:51.279 INFO EDCORE (Main): SymInit: Symbol-SearchPath: 'C:\Games\DCS World OpenBeta\bin;', symOptions: 532, UserName: 'user' 2025-10-03 12:09:51.281 INFO EDCORE (Main): OS-Version: 10.0.19045 () 0x100-0x1 2025-10-03 12:09:51.282 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x00000000000017d0 (lua): lua_gettop + 0x0 2025-10-03 12:09:51.284 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x00000000000761eb (edCore): Lua::Config::Config + 0x1B 2025-10-03 12:09:51.286 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000a980de (DCS): SW + 0x47BEAE 2025-10-03 12:09:51.286 INFO DX11BACKEND (8972): DX11Renderer::shutdown() 2025-10-03 12:09:51.288 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000a97c32 (DCS): SW + 0x47BA02 2025-10-03 12:09:51.290 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000a9078b (DCS): SW + 0x47455B 2025-10-03 12:09:51.290 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000a45aaf (DCS): SW + 0x42987F 2025-10-03 12:09:51.291 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x000000000015a56a (Visualizer): smSceneManager::DestroySceneManager + 0xCA 2025-10-03 12:09:51.291 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000a66f36 (DCS): SW + 0x44AD06 2025-10-03 12:09:51.291 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x00000000025b8da1 (DCS): AmdPowerXpressRequestHighPerformance + 0x1097D9D 2025-10-03 12:09:51.291 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x00000000010dac82 (DCS): SW + 0xABEA52 2025-10-03 12:09:51.291 INFO EDCORE (Main): 0x0000000000017374 (KERNEL32): BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x14 2025-10-03 12:09:51.504 INFO EDCORE (Main): Minidump created.

This is my favorite helicopter, no doubt about it! I hope to add a simple AI to help us use weapons. After the 2024 update, the aotu-collective function was removed. Although it is more realistic, it is more difficult for single-player players to operate HOT3. It would be great if an AI similar to MI-24 could be added. Players can specify the location where the AI searches for targets and select targets from a list. When the AI completes aiming, a direction prompt appears on the screen, and the player uses the rudder to aim at the prompt in order to launch the HOT3. Furthermore, a simple pilot AI can also be developed, just like the function of the OH58D. Currently, if you operate the HOT3 in the co-pilot, you also need to control the collective in order to maintain altitude and hovering stability, which is really too painful.

Forgot about F-15C?

The system having a blanking circuit and sync with the radar was never in dispute. Idk why the thread keeps looping on this. The debate is if it's able to handle blanking with HPRF waveforms or not. And assuming for a second that this is true. As far as im aware it's still being disabled when the radar is transmitting in MPRF, and has not been mentioned by the devs as being incapable of handling it. So this portion is at least can be concluded to be a bug and should get corrected. If newy can get some more clarification from the team on why the blanking circuits cant handle HPRF signals that would get great. Then this debate can actually be productive and the right sourcing can be found to prove or disprove it. Otherwise this is just going to keep going nowhere.

The last line of the bit test shows "RESTRT", didn't know if it's a typo or acronym.

Microsoft and ED are 2 different companies, plus ED has its own dev team which doesn't require other parties to do complex work. There are 2 jets out of EA recently, F/A-18c and F-16c maybe some others but anyway so ppl have some free time even tho development on those jets is not over, workload is not as much as before with those 2 mentioned jets. Ofc F-35 is coming, MiG-29 is out etc.... So with resources to allocate elsewhere they would be foolish to miss out on getting the full cake for this one, cause Rafale sales are going to be huge. That's what I think about 3rd party on Rafale. But lets wait and see.

I didnt see your last reply. That aside, if you have no idea what I'm talking about, what is the point in replying? You are wasting your time and mine no disrespect meant. Yes I am but it's self-evident I'm wasting my time with it. I will just have to upgrade my PC and be done with it.

Варианта два. Первый. Не правильно назначен канал. Просто помним, что частота назначенная на номер 1 в редакторе это канал ноль в кабине. Вариант два. На земле работает кнопка "связь". После взлета через нее докричаться до кого то не реально. Надо использовать кнопку "микрофон, кнопка радио". Если мне память не изменяет, она по умолчанию не назначена. Абсолютно аналогично с тем, что есть на Элке.

So far, all signs point to a third party. I'm getting curious to see if ED will say anything about it in this week Newsletter.

I just hope ED will develop Rafalem don't want 3rd parties on this, and may it be F3 version.

sling loading cargo touches ground and fly's up in the air it happens with all of the choppers, on our server. for over a year now is there any way to stop it