All Activity
- Past hour
-
waiting for resolution ED/RAZBAM Situation Info & Discussion
Esac_mirmidon replied to NineLine's topic in RAZBAM
Beeing extremely educated, yes, very poorly -
waiting for resolution ED/RAZBAM Situation Info & Discussion
ChuckJäger replied to NineLine's topic in RAZBAM
this whole thing has been handled so poorly. -
MidWeek Deals | DCS Update Summary | Digital Blue Angels
ChuckJäger replied to Graphics's topic in Official Newsletters
unreal. -
MidWeek Deals | DCS Update Summary | Digital Blue Angels
Raisuli replied to Graphics's topic in Official Newsletters
Ahhh, but after the Hawk debacle they fixed it so that can't happen again. Still have my user manual for the Hawk; it was a fun bird...totally get why those mercenary pilots from Oman thought they could shoot through the hanger bay doors on the Connie! -
Thanks for the link Those Sampan and junks are beautiful ! Alas it seems that they cannot sink ... they are destroyed with rockets but there no way to see it : junks don't disappear at all or don't have any damage model ... Sinking should be enough for me A small drawback too is that it seems to be impossible to put live boat on my NAM rivers only statics but it's not a big problem for me. It could be a nice hidden harbor addons ! We are waiting for you new version impatiently thanks
-
Its over. If they dont want to say it now they will be forced by reality soon. Just people cant swallow all in one bite.
-
......you're like a broken record. You and others are not going to get the answers you want no matter how many times you ask it. Once side seems to stick to that confidentiality agreement rigidly, and the and has buttoned up and the pro Razbam crowd hate them for that, the other side has at least on 3 occasions in 2025 breached this alleged confidentiality clause, claimed there has been no communications, and no settlement/agreement reached and used the court of public opinion to fight their cause..the pro ED crowd hate them for that. It's comedy gold really.
-
Antenna Mast Fluttering, Whistle Effect and Wing Vibration
MAXsenna replied to Invisibull's topic in Bugs and Problems
Thanks, almost! What @Art-J says. I believe the Forum did this automatically a couple of years ago and this catches people off guard! Cheers! -
Mission 06 - Suggestion
WhiteDear replied to speed-of-heat's topic in DCS: F-16C The Gamblers Campaign
I had the same problem. I couldnt find the technical because i looked in the wrong area where i thought the marina was and where the pilot went down. @baltic_dragon, minor bug. Tacan 36X for Bear works in the beginning, but i noticed it had dropped out when i was on my way home. I tried 30X, 34X and 36X. Could not dial Bear in again. First technical east of the factory gets partly damaged by the JDAM's. That is likely not intended. -
arshiaebi joined the community
-
missing info Radio stops working after a couple of minutes
BluesRocket replied to Mac D's topic in General Bugs
I cannot get the tankers to respond whatsoever after the last update. -
Carrier IFLOLS overbright…..and overlay query
BammBamm replied to markturner1960's topic in Bugs and Problems
Call in for every flight or just the first flight? In other words, if you have a multiplayer wing and 12 players coming in to land, if the first one calls in, can everyone land without a crash or does every flight have to call in independently? -
Keep in mind it's a HUGE rudder.
-
Yet allegedly you've written more on Discord than you have shared here: So is that indeed a message that you wrote and if so, why can you explicitly state on Discord that the agreement is "not being implemented right now," but are not willing to write it here?
-
JPS-27 joined the community
-
I’m not asking ED to cover Steam’s cut. I’m asking them to acknowledge that Steam customers deserve the same basic fairness as E-shop customers. They chose to sell on Steam, they benefited from the wider audience and visibility, and with that comes responsibility. If they can't offer a full refund, fine... but offering nothing while E-shop users get credit isn't right. We're not asking for special treatment, just equal respect as paying customers. This isn’t just about money. It’s about trust.
-
I am over it. ED says “alleged”, Razbam says “alleged.” It’s a he said / she said, and it is moronic. At this point it is ED’s problem. If the modules stop working (some already have, AV-8B JTAC ATHS for example hasn’t worked for months), what will ED do? Refunds? What is the plan?
-
We are acting in good faith on the agreement, yes. Sorry, in my head, we shouldn't have to say that, but I understand why you all need to hear it. This is not actually a direct answer to the question. 'Acting in good faith' can still mean that ED diverged from their obligations under the settlement agreement, but did so in a way that you consider to be for a good reason and thus still acting in good faith. For example, let's say that I'm obligated to show up at work at 9 o'clock every day, but one day I get into a car accident and am not able to make it in time. Then I can argue that I got to work as soon as reasonably possible and I thus acted in good faith, but my employer would also have a point that the contract wasn't followed. So then you can get into the murky area of whether the situation truly was a 'force majeure' and the question how this has to be handled. So did ED follow the settlement contract to the letter, or not?
-
Carrier IFLOLS overbright…..and overlay query
rob10 replied to markturner1960's topic in Bugs and Problems
As long as you call inbound to the carrier it's not broken. If you don't, then yes you can get a CTD on landing with current build. And that's why the "5 minutes" of testing probably didn't catch this. I automatically called in when I was testing after seeing reports of this and I had no problem landing. Until someone figured out this was cause I couldn't recreate it. Once I stopped calling in then I could reproduce it. -
Hi, we get tagged hundreds of times in a week and we can miss some, its always better to send us a dm or message us on discord for third party forum requests. thank you
-
Crash when landing F-14 on carrier despite LSO waveoff
primus_TR replied to Kobymaru's topic in Game Crash
Since the last patch, F4U and F14 both cause a DCS crash when the hook grabs the wire. -
So you want a refund from ED through Steam. OK, lets say Steam takes a 30% cut (no idea if that's the actual amount, but that seems to be what general consensus is) on every sale. So ED is already out 30% on what you paid. Now you want (presumably) 100% back. I'd pretty much guarantee Steam isn't going to cover the 30%. So now ED got 30% less for your original purchase in the first place AND has to pay you back a 30% premium (since Steam isn't going to cover that). So for easy math let's say you paid $100. ED got $70. So it's flat out costing them at least $30 more for every refund the authorize through Steam, and the whole $100 is coming out of their pocket. Like it or not, with the store credit they are offering ED store customers they still have the $100, it's just being moved around. So trying to claim a "fairness" argument since they are giving ED store customers credit doesn't work. Even if ED was giving full cash refunds, they'd still be paying an extra $30 to Steam users so where's the fairness even there?
-
Landing the F14 and F4U both causes a DCS crash for me, at the moment the hook grabs the wire. Touch and Gos are ok, but hook, no go. It looks like there is a major fukup with all carriers after the last patch. ED acknowledged the problem, and hopefully the next patch will address it.
-
That is all you need to remember. There is a confidentiality order in place on this. We have said what we can right now. Thanks
-
@BJ55 Issue was too little deadzone on my TDC Axis. Adding a couple of percent to that fixed my issues. Thankfully, I had a bit of direct help in the Razbam Discord. Thanks for your effort BJ55, I really appreciate the advice earlier on!
-
If you find this funny, that’s your call. I’m not here for laughs. I’m here because I (and others) were left in a mess, and doing nothing just accepts that as normal. I’m not okay with that.