Leaderboard

Um ... hello? DCS? ;)

The official movie from the 2009 Training Season of the Virtual Aerobatic Team "BERKUTS" is online. :lol: With a length of three minutes, it shows some gracefull manuevers, nice 7-ship formations with a nice background of elegant music. A special feature for this and coming movies, is the high resolution of 1920x1080p, Full HD. To download the movie click here. To visit the V.A.T. "BERKUTS" forum, click here.

Одна миссия из антитеррористической кампании.

Ah, un message "glace en formation" quand le dégivrage est activé, c'est tout de suite plus cohérent. :) Quant à la traduction de l'étudiant, je suis bien curieux de savoir où il a trouvé le mot "rotor" dans "ОБЛЕДЕН ВКЛЮЧИ ПОС ВИНТ"... Arf, grillé...

Я и не говорил что ты *мер, я написал что разница между 4000 и 4200 нужна только им. По деньгам предложенные им варианты были одинаковы, так что я советую наилучшее вложение, ктому же исходя из перспектив дальнейшего совершенствования софта более перспективное. Я студент с опытом, особо серьезных проектов у меня не было, но я делал несколько сайтов, несколько несложных программ на заказ, программлю микроконтроллеры и собираю схемы, уже несколько лет составляю конфиги всем знакомым и им же их собираю.

depilot для тебя использование другими приложениями 4-ядер это бред? тяжелый диагноз.. я не забывал ни о чем, вот только после преодоления определенной частоты (3ггц для дкс) смысла в еще большей частоте кроме как для пиписькомеряния ("смотрите у меня 34 фпс а не 30") нет, поэтому то, что двухядерник можно разогнать на пару сотен мегагерц больше чем квад никому кроме бенчеров не интересно. Насчет "бери большей частоты" ты советуешь ему просто выбросить деньги на ветер, т.е. заплатить за сделанные на заводе установки лишние пару тысяч рублей вместо того чтобы ввести похожие параметры в биосе самому бесплатно.

Ты палку не перегибай. Это ты давно со своей многоядерностью бред несешь, я молчал из вежливости. Никто не говорит о 4-6 гигагерцах, я сказал всего лишь о том, что двухъядерники можно и больше разогнать (твой был аргумент о разгоне квадов, но ты забыл о том, что можно не только квады разгонять), чем квады. А ДКС именно на "конрое" хватает по горло? :)

I think Shaman was joking Vekki ;)

Если не обращать внимания, двухъядерники разгоняются до бОльших частот (до 6 ггц), чем вышеозначенные ядерники (квад до 5 ггц), то да, не помешают. С чего вы взяли, что в два раза больше кэша как-то скажется на производительности? В два раза больше кэша потому, что ядер в два раза больше - каждому ядру нужна своя кэш-память. А так кэша - да, сильно больше. Если у джипа бензобак в два раза больше, то он что, уедет в два раза дальше? Граждане! DCS важна частота процессора и количество ядер не менее двух. Два - не потому, что они оба нужны DCS, а потому, что работа драйверов видеокарты выделяется в отдельный процесс, и соответственно, может выполяться параллельно. Большее количество ядер к росту производительности DCS привести не может, как добавление колёс не позволит машине ехать быстрее.

Décidement tu comprend pas ce que plusieurs ont souligné ci dessus Ce n'est pas un bug, c'est le fonctionnement du réel Ka-50 livré a l'armée Russe ==> ED s'est "contenté" de copier le plus exactement et fidèlement possible et c'est tout, ce n'est pas sa vocation ni sont rôle d'amélioré le vrai Ka-50 (ps: pour ton info ED a eu des données precise du fabriquant):music_whistling: Donc quand tu dis ou sous entend plus haut que ED a menti "sur la marchandise" sur ce point, tu te fourvoie tout simplement et en discutant ici Pour la pertinence de ta remarque , je ne discuterai pas mais entre nous quand j'enclenche le degivrage je l'oublie pas, et je suis qu'un pilote virtuel ;) Woualla je :pilotfly: définitivement

Сделал для себя справочник по просторней. Может кому тоже приглянется. WideEncyclopedia.part1.rar WideEncyclopedia.part2.rar WideEncyclopedia.part3.rar

It's pretty amazing that it's even possible. Do single rotor aircraft have similar issues? Itkovian

There will be a market for this.....as small boys will grow up....... I never understood its downfall anyway....... Lots has to do with the market approach and delivering quality goods....... I think ED's DCS:BS is a good start for the new era and I defenitely hope they continue to rise.....

On se connait? J'essayais d'expliquer comment on raisonne quand on parle d'interface homme-machine. Désolé de ne pas abonder dans ton sens. Ceci dit, bons vols. KD

Interesting cockpits ! ;) Then, the fuselage is almost over.

Mais non, justement ! "On" ne m'a pas expliqué comment c'est dans la réalité. "On" m'a juste écrit qu"a priori ce serait pareil". Je n'ai pas de compétences en russe, et donc je ne peux pas savoir si en russe le message est "Allumez le dégivrage" ou si c'est une mauvaise traduction. Et d'une. De deux, certains systèmes dis-tu peuvent annoncer des messages qui ne sont pas nécessaires. Mais là ce n'est pas qu'il n'est pas nécessaire, il est nuisible : il demande (au moins en anglais) d'allumer un système déjà en route. Si le pilote obéit et manipule l'interrupteur sans vérifier l'état du système, il va éteindre le dégivrage. Il s'agit donc d'un défaut de conception, soit de l'hélico lui-même soit de la traduction du russe en anglais. Tu appelles ça comme tu veux, moi j'appelle ça un bug. C'est tout de même incroyable qu'on ne puisse émettre aucune critique sur cette simu sans déclencher une querelle ! :pilotfly: Il n'a rien de soviétique, je te signale... tu vois, l'importance des mots....

That's okay - it doesn't depend on you as seeing it to be anything - it depends on resources and other things that are more realistic and practical in real life than someone's opinion. Also, RoF is by no means a standard. It has some very interesting things in it but erm - it has nothing to do with a jet combat sim. Further, I know you haven't kept up on this, but the graphics engine isn't the only thing getting updates every module - the AI and other things do as well ... including the ones on the ground. ;) Small concessions? Only for people who are stuck complaining about one little thing instead of seeing the whole. While you're here laying FUD, ED has been leveraging and extending the foundation of work they've laid with DCS: BS. This same foundation allows them to now upgrade or update other parts of the game while maintaining a certain standard of fidelity - and increasing it with each iteration. I'm sorry it's too slow for you - maybe you'll see a hornet in RoF? ;)

The Future of our Genre

Could someone please give me an example of the difference between the use of the DT and DH switches: DESIRED HEADING_ DESIRED TRACK ANGLE SWITCH The DH DT switch located on the RH sill panel provides either a Course Reference or Heading reference for the Auto pilot to maintain. In the Desired Track (DT) position the AFCS assumes that the pilot wants to fly the planned track to the active PVI800 Waypoint, that is it selects Course Line steering. A course deviation scale is displayed in the lower portion of the HUD. In the Desired Heading (DH) position the AFCS assumes the pilot wants to fly directly to the Active PVI800 waypoint. In the deselected position (centre) the AFCS assumes the pilot wants to maintain the last set reference heading.:helpsmilie:

If you could just see my sweat on my forehead :shocking:. Pure panic :lol:. Its fun to have fun at whoevers' expense.:P

Everything, especially manuals should be written in plain English! It doesn't matter how stupid or intelligent you are, you are more likely to understand a complicated topic - such as this poxy Kamov's Russian logic :music_whistling:- if it's in easy to understand words! I couldn't agree more. ED if you want to employ my writing services for future manuals... :)

Все 5 текстур 2048*2048?

Encore une fois ça n'est pas un bug ! A la rigueur, appellons-ça une conception peu ergonomique. Ceci dit, je te l'accorde, les ingénieurs qui concoivent les cockpits ont la facheuse habitude de considérer que le pilote connait (un peu) son appareil, y compris le fonctionnement des interrupteurs...

Speed, this posting mught give you some insight: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=741359&postcount=5

In this case during an ejection not the "pilot" would be ejected upwards, but the helicopter downwards and the pilot would stay in space there where she is:surprise:. It's not so important how it saves lives as long as it does its' job.

If your rotor speed drops low enough (during these fancy manoeuvres), the electrical generators do not produce enough power, momentarily shutting off the autopilot system. You know this has happened by the buttons flashing as the systems are now disengaged. Nate Edit:- Also consider assigning a button to engage/disengage the Heading hold, this is much easier that using the trim when changing heading. Disengage - change heading to desired direction - re-engage - Trim is unaffected. Alternatively Fly with the Flight Director on all the time.

Hiya Fing, The only part you are missing about the PVI is the fact that it drives the heading and distance info on the HSI (round compass like guage on the lower left side next to the TV screen)...the numbers, while looking pretty, are only lat/long info, and only usefull for a select few hardcore ;) ... Use the HSI to see where the PVI waypoint is. the HSI is your primary navigation display, and gives you heading and range (and track angle) to the Selected PVI waypoint. The PVI also gives the same info to your HUD display, so will show a heading carrot on your HUD, and it also instructs the autopilot. What can (often) happen in combat, is for the AC power to drop out for various reasons (emergency stops degrading rotor RPM, or damage to the generators), in which case you will not have the ABRIS to navigate with.... the Abris is a great "quick look" SA tool, but your navigation will be much more accurate if you use the HSI and PVI .. The PVI stores up to 6 waypoints, and 2 airfields (all done automatically in the mission editor by the mission designer)..to access the waypoints, press the "waypoint" button, then press the number of the waypoint you want (1 .. 6), be aware!!!!... the PVI waypoints can be differnt names / numbers to the Abris waypoints! ... PVI Nav waypoint 1 is the first NON Takeoff waypoint... Takeoff and Landing airfields are stored seperately, and access by pressing the "Air Field" button, then either 1 (for takeoff field) or 2 (for landing field IF it is different from takeoff) so in short, the ABRIS is great, and usefull, but is only a navigation guide....accuracy and integration into the shark's AP and sterring systems is only via the PVI.

My g/f laughs every time use my TIR but I have ben using it for years and I couldn't care .. once I answered the door forgetting I had a cap and trackclip on and, still, I am stoically committed to my TIR :-) The TIR makes a whole world of difference ... eventually you forget it is there and just look around naturally and you only notice when you *can't* use it in a game, not when you can.

WarM, it's your purchase, you play how you want to. To play all missions in game mode, go to Options section from main screen, select gameplay options and click on Game at the bottom, and Apply to all missions. If you do get bored of playing rail shooter :smilewink: however, there's a great introduction/guide for beginners to the sim side here: http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/2626185/STICKY_Tutorial_How_to_take_of.html#Post2626185 Like a Dummies Guide to Black Shark, will have you up and killing stuff in 10 minutes. Can't recommend it highly enough. As for the medals, I think they're points based, whereas the promotions are flying hours based? You might have to look around forums, all I know is that once I started bombing ships, they couldn't give me medals fast enough.

Maybe you should read my post? Unless you're being sarcastic but the absence of smiley didn't suggest so, and in which case ignore me! What I was saying is that sometimes the plain English explanation is great! I can read and am relatively intelligent (:cry:) but the manual for certain things just sounds like gobbledegook. I appreciate that may come across as a bit thick, or maybe I am impatient but I've learn't a hell of a lot from posters on here, both ED team and members about how to fly the thing. I just don't want to put off noobs like me, who are worried about asking a question. Like everything there should be a balance - you should take the time to learn it yourself to a point but a bit of advice from a poster is sacred sometimes. I think that anyone who has read this forum and actually bothers posting having bought the sim knows what they are in for and that it won't be easy, which filters the HAWX people out. I just wouldn't go too far the other way and be too exclusive to people who at the end of the day are just the general public. So thats why 'RTM' responses are not always helpful. (IMHO!) :smilewink:

It's funny, I didn't know there was a shortcut until after I figured out how to start the damn thing lol. You may be right, if you're looking to blow stuff up right away then autostarting may be a better idea so as not to lose interest. Still I liked it but I geek out on stuff like that lol. If I can say one bad thing about all the switches in the cockpit it's that they are making me want to buy a damn TrackIR bad.

Can you post some screenshots showing that things that are rendered on your centre screen are not rendered on your side screens when you do nothing but turn your head? What do you mean by "not rendered very well"? I suspect what you are seeing is an LOD issue, where units are replaced by low-poly "blocks" under certain conditions, and it's possible that very wide aspects are not properly considered by the engine when determining what is outside the FOV for LOD rendering?

Awesome! Just pure perfection! Is this on YouTube in HD too? Others need to watch this! I downloaded the movie in 1080p and never have I seen Lock On FC looking that good! Just awesome! Can´t wait for more of this! How often do you guys train for this and how long does it take before one can accomplish these skills? Are some of you real pilots? Takes some time to accomplish such skills! Respect for that! :) 10/10.

You want a dumbed down version? Desired Heading: Flies you directly towards whatever waypoint you have selected, regardless of where you happen to be when you activate it. Desired track angle: Flies you to the closest point between your last waypoint and the one you have selected and then follows the line towards the selected waypoint. Middle position: Keeps you heading in whatever direction your were facing when you released trim. EDIT: Maybe you want to know why/when to use each one? Desired track angle is used primarily when you need to follow a specific course (ie: to get through known SAM coverage. Desired heading just gets you to the waypoint by the fastest route.

It's nice to see people making an effort but the Logitech just doesn't have enough buttons to make an effective HOTAS. This on the other hand :D

Here is a mission I've been working on the last few days. Be advised that the mission opens with an opening scene of a recon flight and then you are placed in the cockpit on the runway ready to go in about a min. The briefing for the mission is below. Enjoy........ ron ----------------------------------------- Our limited forces have recently taken over the airbase west of the city and are awaiting the main force and supplies to arrive. Opposing forces east of the city have set up a road block east of the river on the main highway. It has been relativly quiet until this morning when a local Recon flight was surprised and shot down by a mobile SAM installation that must have arrived in the area of the road block late last night and the airport has been under rocket attack. Our aircraft availability at this time is low. 2 Mig 29's are awaiting parts from an inbound transport that is scheduled to arrive soon, however, the inbound transport has gone NORDO (no radios) and is unaware of the SAM threat. The remaining 2 Mig 23's are operational, however, aircover will be unavailable until the SAM threat is eliminated. Launch with your wingman and follow the flight plan route in an effort to surprise the SAM site from the hills to the north. Destroy the SAM site and provide support for two tank groups heading to the area to hold the bridge. Be advised that we have a rescue helicopter enroute to search for the crew that was shot down this morning. You should also be advised that we have received unconfirmed reports of a FARP that has been established to the east which could provide close air support. Once the SAM site is down we will launch air cover as it becomes available. Good Luck! Road Block.miz