Leaderboard

You don't know me and what I did for over 30 years. You always say the same thing when ever someone has a point of view different from yours or should I say ED/DCS and yours. You don't engage in conversation you attack. It is the community(those hundreds of others you refer to) here that is asking for FC3 not just me, or do you only read what you want to. ED does not understand the community here or we would see change, so stop all this foolishness about ED/DCS. It is well documented here in the forum on ED/DCS's way of making decisions. I really don't understand why you sir can not engage in meaningful conversations without attacking people, not just me. I guess you are who you are. You know very well that when I say community that I am not speak for them, it is a reference to what the forum members have said and you know that but yet you turn it into an attack. Guess you know no other way to respond. Too bad. I do wish you a good day and this is my last statement on this thread subject.

Yes. Creating a pretty external model for an AI plane such as the E-2 and F-15 is 'easy' (relatively!). I would imagine the hard part is creating, testing, and then re-testing a realistic flight model, simulating and troubleshooting the avionics, and filling the external model with realistic hydraulics, linkages, engines, undercarriage and so on and then making it all damagable etc., and let's not forget the steps I probably missed. With all that in mind, I would imagine having a nice-looking external model is only a small step towards a new DCS module. Like, a very small step even. So, a new external model for the E-2 therefore doesn't necessarily suggest an F-18 module, just as seeing a new external model for the F-15E doesn't necessarily suggest an F-15 module. It might suggest something, but there is literally so much more required to complete a DCS module that it would be foolish to make predications based purely on external models. Maybe ED is just updating external model fidelity to make things look pretty? It could simply be a small part of the never-ending incremental graphical improvements, nothing more. I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade, but I think people should be realistic about what must actually be involved in making these sims.

http://www.simflight.com/2011/08/top-gun-versus-fsx/ Love it! Makes me hope for DCS F/A-18! ;)

Ну вообще, чтобы МФИ что-то показывали, неплохо бы их включать, я думаю.:)

reported it too:thumbup: told them that it did it with 11.5, 11.7 and 11.8 but ok with 11.6

After being torn between hope and despair by IL-2 Cliffs of Dover for several months I took the leap and bought DCS: A-10C a couple of weeks ago. Wow! Thanks ED! I've never been much of an online simmer but I've been finding myself on 74th FS server nearly everyday for almost a week now. It's so much fun especially when you -finally- are getting a somewhat basic understanding of all the weapons systems and stuff. So thank you ED for this great sim, below is a picture of my crate after landing -after a successful sortie- without a nosewheel. :thumbup:

Note who started this. Almost all moderators here always seem to go on the attack when certain statements are made when they know very well they are true and have been posted here by forum members. That is anyone who has been around awhile, has seen them so don't pretend that statements have not been made. I am not going to start picking out threads or statements. You know what I am saying so lets just let it drop. I will not repeat myself, but read my first statement. Nothing flaming here just comparing ED products not other sims. We here all know that there are threads asking for FC3 or another patch for FC2 and reasons are given. We also know ED/DCS stand on this. I don't think I am wrong in saying that the community and I don't speak for them but the threads are here to be found, are asking for FC2 patch or perhaps FC3, while we wait for fast movers in the DCS series. we are asking for a link between ka50,a10 and Fc2 especially for multiplayer. If threads have not been posted reference this, I will stand corrected and apologies for my in-accuracies. We always hear that FC2 is eight years old. I ask do we see any better game in town for what FC2 offers the consumer. The DCS series is awesome but it still lacks some of the very fine features that FC2 has offer to this day even at 8 years old as you say. I see that in some places that FC2 still sells for $29.95. Not bad for and 8 year old sim. the KA-50 is around $26.00 and the latest, The A-10 for around 39.95. This would indicate to me that FC2 still has things to offer that the public likes and still spends money to purchase this title. This should be proof that ED/DCS products both old and new are still favored as the best bang for your dollars, euro, etc. Surly no one will disagree with that, especially me. Cheers.

If this works then congratulations! You've just slain the biggest party pooper of BS. :) But now the trees look like poo. Do they look like this in the same conditions without your mod?

Обнаружил сегодня в составе этого архива замечательную картинку "TM Warthog Controls". Сразу стало легче! Немножко позаменял на "по-русски" там где для меня не сходу понятно:

You're neither flying a large transport, nor should you have /any/ trouble /whatsoever/ hitting the glide slope visually even with an overweight Su-25/A-10C (and why would you be landing with them being this heavy?). You do not need this aid at /all/ when you can see the runway. Full stop. There's no 'extra wise' only 'I don't know what the runway sight picture is' which may as well translate to 'I don't know how to land' :) Edit: I just wanted to add though: Everyone has to start somewhere. To the OP: I'm not trying to insult you, just saying you're missing some basic flying skill. It isn't hard to acquire, but it is what you need. If the needles initially aid you to see what the sight picture should look like, great - that's what you should use them for 2-3 times, and then turn'em off. You have many ways to cross-check that you're on glideslope, and you should do this despite having the needles in, say, a 0-viz approach. For example, you can check AoA/Speed/Altitude/Distance. You know that you need about 300'/nm to be on glideslope, you know what AoA you need to maintain, and you know what speed you need to maintain. The reason for doing /all/ these cross-checks is that instruments are prone to failure. Although this is N/A FC2, you should still make the habit happen, and it will make you a better pilot :)

ok hope it works

Moin, also ich habe die Treiber (es gibt leider keine neueren als von der CD) nach Anleitung installiert. Dann sollte im Tray ein Icon erscheinen. Die Monitore heissen im PopUp menü Wang irgendwas@800x400 oder so... Im tray Icon für beide "Erweiterten Desktop" wählen (nicht die Windows Einstellungen nutzen!) Dann dieses nette Utility nutzen um die Monitore UNTER den Hauptmonitor zu platzieren; http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=70993 im DCS Settings Menü daran denken Vollbild/Fullscreen zu deaktivieren die Auflösung korrekt einstellen siehe hier: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=60815 In Kurz und stark vereinfacht: Breite des Hauptmonitors x Höhe Hauptmonitor + Höhe Somikon z.B. 1680x1530 eine lua Datei mit den Settings für MFCD auf extra Screens anlegen Der Multi-monitor Thread ist sehr detailliert, da steht alles für die lua settings drin. Wenn du da gar nicht weiterkommst PM oder poste hier...

I find it interesting that it's supposed to be "stealthy" (or at least a complete F-22 knockoff) but they didn't do anything with the inlet ducts. Fanblades are one of the the biggest and most obvious radar reflectors on an airframe. They're literally straight tubes, unless they put an array of baffles or something inside, which would seriously compromise its supersonic capability. That means that if this thing is flying in your direction, you will see it on radar. Hell even if it's flying away from you you'd see it even better. I don't like it. The overall design is quite obviously lifted straight from the F-22, while the engines with that moronic rear-facing radar spur looks as bad as it does on every other Russian aircraft. I also hate the F-14 look with the engines wildly displaced apart from each other, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense from a design perspective either - there's not much to be gained from doing that and, in the event of an engine failure, it makes the aircraft extremely difficult to control. I'm highly skeptical of its stealth capabilities and, considering it's Russian, its avionics package as well. Does anyone know if this is *really* stealthy, or is it like China's stealth fighter where they just put angles on everything, copied some pictures off the internet, and hoped for the best?

попробуй SST 6_6_6_9 ftp://ftp.saitek.com/pub/software/beta/SST 6_6_6_9/Saitek_SD6_64_Software.exe у меня Win7 64bit на Х52 SST седьмой версии ваще никак не становились.

Hi I'm running an open server for A10 but am having problems with ServMan and making the subadmin login work. I'm a bit confused about the username part of the config if it's not needed for /login password. I'm guessing this should be the same as set in the MP options screen? Could someone please take a look at my config file and see if I'm doing something wrong? Many thanks Sleem serverconfig.lua

Shouldn't have developed an aircraft that uses it then :P

You guys just have to learn how to use the superior system. :D

Well okay- After 5 hours I was able to upload all the files: Here is one link for all files: http://remixshare.com/container/f5c11e1838 And here seperated: Template for my F-15 Eagle : http://remixshare.com/download/pkqij Template MiG-29UB: http://remixshare.com/download/tx3ez Template MiG-29 A or C : http://remixshare.com/download/e44hl Weapons and Tanks for MiG`s and Eagles: http://remixshare.com/download/55z30 MiG-29UB model: http://remixshare.com/download/u6wyd MiG-29A model+ Textures: http://remixshare.com/download/3rl4t MiG-29C model+Textures: http://remixshare.com/download/s6fyu F-15C model + Textures: http://remixshare.com/download/0kxsv Use the skin files to add more skins. Everybody is highly welcommed to upgrade or modify textures- Thanks for all helpings and fun with the aircrafts, Tom