Leaderboard

Comprehensive description of the TAD in DCS A10. Includes Moving and Fixed modes, Object and symbol display/hide, Screen and map scaling, Sharing SPI, FPLAN and MARK modes, 'Using the hook to find and mark a bullseye call, Network config, Managing FAC pushed target points. Hooking modes, including ownship, and BULLS to Cursor, and beneift for marking, and coordinates, and hooking air objects.

Wow ..... frostiken , maybe you should show us how its done properly dude , instead of harping on about whats missing !!! Everyone else seemed more than stisfied ..... maybe Fish has better things to do than spend his time explaining stuff to the mass's . And shouting too , where's your manners ? Thanks fish , I find your work more than helpful :)

:megalol: :D i made a little nuke in AE...would be nice if ed could patch some nukes in :D :pilotfly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swaoyvIoDjU

Vorrei portare alla vostra attenzione cosa abbiamo provato sulle radio dell'A-10 e KA50. Dopo aver fatto alcune prove con Taio e Aikanaro (Crimsonflag) vorrei precisare: Le frequenze in uso sulla Alpha che per il KA50 partono da (VHF2) 100.000 a 149.975 e da 220.000 a 399.975 mentre la R828 (VHF1) ha canali prefissati che sono: Ch1 35.650 Ch2 26.675 Ch3 48.550 Ch4 35.650 Ch5 67.775 Ch6 52.825 Ch7 48.250 Ch8 42.050 Ch9 52.750 Ch10 23.725 A-10 parte da 30.000 a 159.975 sia la alpha che la foxtrot (attenzione a impostare AM/FM a seconda del caso; comunque un suono basso vi avvertirà di cambiare impostazione) Abbiamo provato con l'A-10 impostando la foxtrot e alcune sono raggiungibili, ma ho notato che sulla Alpha se la impostiamo su FM si possono inserire praticamente tutte (impostando a seconda del caso FM/AM) ad esclusione del Ch10 del KA50 che ha una frequenza sotto i 30.00 e cioè di di 23.725; quest'ultima non è raggiungibile dall'A-10 Ancora più interessante sono le frequenze unicom di A10 che partono da 220.000 a 399.975 (tralasciamo in Mod. A). Di fatto sono le stesse frequenze del VHF2 del KA50 Vorrei comunque provarle di nuovo alla luce di quanto sopra. Teoricamente tutte le frequenze sembrano essere compatibili (ad eccezione del Ch10- 23.725 del KA50). Se una eventuale prova in due, conferma l'operatività delle frequenze, questo sarebbe molto interessante. A solo scopo informativo, trascrivo: The radio frequency spectrum and aviation applications: Radio Frequency band.......Frequency limits............Equivalent wavelength............................Application VLF....................................3 - 30 kHz.....................Very long 100 - 10 km(kilometric).............No current applications LF......................................30 - 300 kHz..................Long 10 - 1 Km (kilometric)......................Loran C, NDB MF.....................................300 khz - 3 MHz............Medium 1 km - 100 m (hectometric)..........NDB HF......................................3 - 30 MHz....................Short 100 - 10 m (decametric)..................SSB Comunications VHF....................................30 - 300 MHz................10 - 1 m (metric)......................................Two way communications, VOR, ILS, LLZ, Marker Beacons UHF....................................300 MHz - 3 GHz...........1 m - 10 cm (decimetric)..........................ILS, GP, DME, SSR, SATNAV, SATCOM SHF....................................3 - 30 GHz................... 10 - 1 cm (centimetric).............................Radio Altimeter, Weather Radar, Ground Radar EHF....................................30 - 300 GHz............ ....10 - 1 mm (millimetric).............................No current application Giusto per completare un pochino nel dettaglio, ecco: Equipment........................................Frequencies Loran C...........................................100kHz NDB................................................190 - 1750 kHz HF Communication...........................2 - 26 MHz ILS Marker.......................................75 MHz ILS Localiser....................................108 - 112 MHz VOR.................................................108 - 118 MHz VHF Communication.........................118 - 137 MHz ILS Glide Slope.................................328.6 - 335.4 MHz DME..................................................960 - 1215 MHz SSR/TCAS........................................1030 - 1090 MHz Radio Altimeter................................4200 - 4400 MHz MLS.................................................5031 - 5091 MHz Weather Radar (X Band)...................9.4 GHZ Spero che possa esservi utile e di non avervi annoiato.

Time fore some images:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth go there, read and learn. ;)

You two should stop flirting with each other and just go on a date :D

tut......another armchair critic that has actually contributed sweet FA, but deems it appropriate that his opinion counts. Don't bother replying, i won't be re-visiting. Fish............good work mate, don't worry about unfounded criticism. It's everywhere. 'T'

That's still the default Hornet model which has been with us since LOMAC v1.0, right? Amazing - what was the poly count again, something like 15000? What on earth do you need 100000+ polys for? Ok, the canopy doesn't look perfectly round yet, as do a few other small details, so make it 20000, maybe even up to 50000 if you want to have a very detailed damage model. But more than that (even on ground vehicles), while having a terrain mesh where you can almost count the triangles by hand? I really hope ED stops making vehicle models even more detailed than they are now, some of them are already far better than they ever need to be. Instead, they should make sure EDGE has the highest terrain mesh resolution they can possibly accommodate, that would be a far more useful application of resources IMHO. I like eye-candy as much as anybody, but the player spends 98% of the time looking out of the cockpit with the terrain as a constant backdrop, NOT admiring in external view the 3D HUD cable on the glare shield of the F-15E that he isn't even flying!

See, my "thing" is I don't jerk people around, and I'm not going to start with you... so here's how it is: I'm not going to make a video because I don't want to and I don't have time. Fish enjoys making these videos and I appreciate them as do others. Don't even try to pretend I'm disrespecting his work or that I don't appreciate it. First of all, given that the point of his videos is to educate the masses, your comment about him having better things to do than explain things to the masses is pretty ridiculous. Not sure what your point there was. Secondly, everyone can tell him how great the video is, but unless someone's willing to be CRITICAL about it, he's not going to know what to cover later or how to make the videos better. "The cruelest thing you can do to an artist is tell them their work is perfect when it isn't." There's way too much about this world that sucks specifically because nobody bothers to be critical, and an artist is always the worst judge of their own work. Would another post telling him how great he is really done anything? I gave him constructive feedback regarding the next video he said he was working on for the TAD. And I specifically wanted to let him know that the JTAC bit with the screen darting all over the place with the plane flying around like there was a drunk* at the controls was awful. Mercifully it was the end of the video and it was only a minor section which mitigated a lot of the damage, but it was *not* a minor mistake that was being made... If he had done that during the whole video it would've been totally unwatchable. I could live with the aircraft kicking out of AP, I cannot live with the TrackIR spiraling around the cockpit. The only point he needs to take away from it is that the 'students' are focusing on the TAD and listening to his words. Every time the aircraft kicks out of AP or starts a dangerous departure from controlled flight, you've caused a distraction that breaks attention and focus. Ensuring the aircraft is trimmed right and minimizing distractions just makes for a much smoother, easier to watch video. I am not an idiot, I don't expect something for nothing, and I don't feel entitled to his tutorials, so as such I absolutely DO NOT expect a 40 minute uncut video to go without a single mistake, nor do I expect him to reshoot and recomment on the whole thing just to fix a minor issue with Auto / Manual map modes. The out-of-control bit was in a minor enough section all the way at the end that I wouldn't expect him to reshoot it just for that either. But I do certainly hope it doesn't happen again. So don't provoke me. I respect Fish and I love his videos and I especially love that he's made literally hours worth of video to help people along. He's helped me out personally himself. But don't ever insinuate that I'm ungrateful. If I didn't respect him and thought so poorly of his work, would I have bothered to listen to Irish Cream being poured into my ears for 40 minutes, talking about a thing I already mostly know how to use, and then offered suggestions for improving the next one? Do you think I'm asking for him to go into Hook modes more in-depth because I need help with them, or because I think others need help with it? Notice how I provided an example of how other Hook modes can be useful, and you should have your answer. I'm not doing this for me. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: * He is Irish... PS: Regarding 'where are my manners': I'm not a groveling simpleton. I'm not going to insult Fish's, your own, or anyone else's intelligence by trying to disguise every single negative thing I have to say in ten layers of honey, like I'm a mud-covered peasant kowtowing before the local lord, trying to suggest that taxes are too high without being thrown in jail and tortured for it...

О! Фланкер взялся рисовать менюшки. У него плохо не бывает!

Боты взлетают с четырех точек с палубы.Сделаать так чтобы и с авианосца\ТАКР был выбор старта как сейчас в редакторе и парковочная зона у лифтов если запуск с парковки.

Pixels are pixels. 22" or 37" and 1080 is still 1080. The physical size has nothing to do with whether a video card can handle it. EDIT: At a half meter away I would find it too large for some things. Depends on the game really.

КРивые рученьки виноваты. Особенно ценна инфа, что установлен "Internet Explorer: 7.0.5730.13" Ставить 64 разрядную семерку обязательно для такого железа, иначе вы его потенциал не раскроете. Бедный интел, он и не знает что такой хреновый проц выпустил, все китайцы... 32 нм уже с разрядностью путают. Вот это вам строка что говорит - "поддержка технологий x86-64"? или вот с сайта интела Instruction Set 64-bit :)

Сделайте еще возможность отключения вида F11, а то через него в онлайе можно подсматривать за вражескими аэродромами, назмекой...