Leaderboard

Take a ride with the Virtual Patriots! :)

:D Всех! Они будут лопаться.

It's not a matter of habit per se. It's more a matter of how you wish to fly the SIM. Absolutely imperative that the product cater insofar as possible for the lowest denominator - as such all possible assists are not only helpful, but mandatory, especially considering the advantage some types of peripheral equipment afford one user and not another. At the end of the day said advantages or disadvantages relating to peripherals, as the case may be, will seriously affect user's enjoyment if said assists are absent.

Hmmm, kind of like shooting down that tanker that just won't hold still!:D

Угу, и самой эффективной ракетой остается р27ЭТ.

Daniel is on the right track - you have to switch FFB off manually in BS1. >>> http://www.en.wiki.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=879201#post879201 This happens because BS1 "thinks" you have a FFB controller - what is generally right - but you don't use it for the cyclic. - so you have to edit the Producer.cfg.

I usually experience this when I select the "wrong" trimming method in options, or if I forget to remove force feedback (I think, but could be wrong, that in 1.02 or lower you had to edit a lua file to remove ffb=on) Get bs2 the dynamic shadows alone are worth it :D edit: i had been running x52+logitech g27 without any issues so in theory mixing and matching shouldn't be a problem. Assuming you follow EtherealN's advise of course.

Correctomundo.

So I'd need to get FSX, then Superbug for FSX then this?

After almost 10 years waiting for the dedicated server i will not buy it.This is how community dies.I buy only the good things and dont ask for a price. Aviation is my life and I'm a pilot but I prefer to play with RC model than to lose my nerve with the simulation which always something missing. Most likely the post will be deleted, but I said honestly. Regards

Не актуально, так как возможна такая ситуация:сама игра зависла, а порт слушается. Попробуйте написать простенький скриптик, который мониторит состояние процесса simulator.exe. Если он не отвечает или отсутствует , завершать существующий процесс и производить авто запуск игры. Красиво и просто.

"You must spread some rep before giving it to Antartist again" Awesome Raptorfest!!!!:thumbup:

Anche io avevo iniziato a pensarla come te ma poi... poi girellando per il forum mi sono imbattuto in diversi post circa un potenziale multiruolo e qualcuno anche molto quotato poi ho visto questo: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=51462 ovviamente questo grafico vuol dire e non vuol dire niente, dipende dalla politica di casa DCS, ma se la matematica non è un opinione!!! Gli unici due AA sono l'eagle ed il raptor, ora.. non credo proprio che si trovino in giro documentazioni valide ed atte a poter poter ricreare un F22 , come la DCS ha in serbo di fare (come ha fatto con il KA50 e con il A10C) con tutti i crismi possibili eccetto qualche OFF LIMIT a noi comuni mortali... ovviamente. Per quanto riguarda il 15 (che ha 9 voti) questo è già presente (bene o male) nel FC e probabilmente sarà presente anche nel FC3, è vero anche l'a10 è presente nel FC ma in versione A (tutta n'altra roba rispetto al C). Come avrai visto in firma, io sono uno di quelli che l'F18... magari!! ma questo non vuol dire che non comprerò l'F15 se questo sarà il prox modulo e sarò comuqnue felice di comprarlo, in quanto comprerò anche il p51 (che per me ha interesse pari a zero) con il p51 ci volerò 3 volte e poi lo metterò in bacheca assieme ad FC, BS1 e BS2, prenderò anche FC3 e lo metterò in bacheca, giusto per dare il mio contributo alla DCS che per come la vedo io "grazie di esistere" altrimenti la nostra estinzione era garantita, l'unico sim che ci teneva in vita era falcon 4 (con tutte le sue molteplici patch, OF prima e BMS adesso, e che ringrazio infinitamente tutti quei ragazzi che ci lavorano sopra, ma questa è un'altra storia). A prescindere da tutto, le nostre sono solo congetture e/o chiacchiere da bar, resto in holding per l'evento, la roadmap stilata è buona cosa, ma in particolare m'interessa il prossimo modulo... ovviamente non mi strappo i vestiti e non mi butto dal 4 piano se l'annuncio verrò tardi nel tempo, mi limiterò ad usare i SIM presenti, non piangerò ed aspetterò, qualsiasi esso sia... meglio se multiruolo... ovvio!!

You know people, when you give a leg theyll going to ask and then curse you for not giving the whole cow. :D

It´s not only negative comments about ED news. All here appreciate the efforts of a Core Base development for DCS world, patches for BS2 and A-10C, new maps, FC3, P-51. All are great news but a very important part of the community are waiting for DCS jet fighter, and news like this only make us wait more and more to see some light around all this dark. And for some of us the dark remains to long in our lives without a DCS approach to a new jet fighter.

Five degrees above ISA means the altimeter will underread about 2%. When you are at 5000' MSL, as indicated by your radio or radar altimeter, with a correct QNH for a sea-level reference point you would read around 4900' on your baro altimeter. You compensated for this by adjusting your altimeter setting for the altimeter to match your radalt. At 500' radalt, the same error is reduced to a mere 10'. Your dialed in adjustment is still 100', so you should be 90' high on your baro altimeter. In other words, it's pretty much as it should be, but still a good catch! :thumbup: Actually, no. ;) For MSL altitudes, local geoids are used. That's why you should have the corresponding geoid undulation specified for every MSL altitude given in aeronautical publications. In other words, MSL altitudes are relative to a theoretical model of what the sea level would be at your current location, had the planet been covered with water. If it wasn't, you'd end up with interesting phenomena such as theoretically level water surfaces flowing, as they would not be perpendicular to the local gravitational field. An interesting side effect of this difference between ellipsoid and geoid is that you can find places where you can follow flowing water downstream and read an increasing height, as measured in your GPS. Your GPS probably gives height relative to the WGS84 ellipsoid rather than the geoid, at least on default settings. :) (To actually see this, you'd need survey-grade corrected GPS receiver though... and probably do a fair bit of walking.) Cheers, Fred

Есть не маловажная ХОТЕЛКА! При загрузки из сети миссии клиентом , чтобы была дорожка "загрузка в % ", а не висела просто надпись .... у всех разная скорость и не могут дотерпеть и сбрасывают ибо не видят что миссия качается !! большинство думают что игра зависла !! И это не только касается ГС