Ala13_ManOWar

I didn't say it was a 100% realistic. "It's fun the way it is", recall that. And, anyway, realistic or not a hundred times better, enjoyable and rewarding to fly with and master than any FC module mate. Even now with 10+ years on top.

What did you just read from Plexus? Just saying...

You kidding, right? Thanks Plexus for taking the time to clarify that in order to ease the mind (hope so, at least) of those always worried about the end of the World. Thank you really mate, your words are truly appreciated .

What I'm losing hope in is humankind...

No, there isn't, ailerons are fully deflected rolling left as the aircraft does roll all the way left mate... Look at the video closely again.

What really baffles me is whether these people are real or just bots... in social media this kind of defeatist messages has a reason, by creating polemic they got clicks and that means money. Ok, stupid they're fine with destroying the World as it is for a few bucks. But here?? A random internet forum without publicity??? What's the point? What do they gain with this attitude? I really wouldn't know... and if they're real messed up people, well... humanity is doomed... But I still want the DCS modules before it all ends up thanks to those .

I don't need to demonstrate myself anything, it's you who need facts to support your bold claims. Anyhow, the first video in OP, the one commented, is very well known as it was studied in case it was some malfunctioning of the plane. Engineers concluded it's NO TORQUE ROLL, it was most probably than not just the stick slipped out from the pilot's hand while he wasn't paying attention at catapult launch and he couldn't grab it back in time to recover... You're welcome.

That doesn't mean "the P-51 has no torque", which is the stupid thing you said. The P-51 do have torque and it's obviously there every take off, landing and just taxiing on the ground. If you have any real data supporting what you say about that torque roll in that particular situation beyond hearsay, go make a proper bug report or thread with all that data. We will all appreciate the enhancement in the flight model. Otherwise "change it because I say so" is still no proof nor help for anything.

Not only is a v2.0 scheduled, but even how it is it's a wonderful module worth the while by long. If you like piloting and making stuff the old way, of course, if you're a button clicky and fancy screens guy it's probably not for you. And that's nothing to do with how old it is, this module is more than enjoyable the way it is despite its age. Have it a go if you haven't already in the trials and see by yourself, don't wait for others to tell you it's bad because it lacks this or that fancy stuff you won't even notice even if it were there.

I'll never understand that either, such a negative and defeatist attitude. Really goes beyond me how these people do survive in theirs day to day when everything in life is so wrong, bad, ugly, useless, unbearable… I'm awaiting for the La-7 as much as anyone, it's a first in hardcore simulation and I want to experience that messy engine management badly. But, what the heck, I've got more things to do in the meantime while awaiting but to keep just staring at the paint dry, I don't care how long does it take the developer to get it proper for launch, when he feels it's ready it'll be ready, but not any sooner and it's fine it is like that. Otherwise who knows what problems might arise due to any rush and in the end it'd be worse than not. And yes, this isn't the only WWII stuff we're awaiting for, but these kind of people, instead of thinking "hey, what a bunch of great stuff is about to come... it'll be great whenever we get it all", just think "how bad they didn't launch it yesterday, they've probably dropped it"... It's unbelievable they stand their lives at all.

Yeah, it's usually the case whenever you're a single developer in your own third party, you know . P.S.: I mean, dunno whether it's recently changed, or not, but he used to be a single person...

Didn't tell you the real joke, I was flying a horrible badly modelled, and underpowered compared to the almighty K-4, humble P-51… he tried to kill me by tricks (we were supposed to be there to make some performance tests... ) but the second I saw him (them, there were two of them, also the infamous around here Supongo were there, also got shot down) I saw them I knew those weren't their intentions but just kill me to take their usual server bitterness out of their mouths... they only got more, the P-51 in real disadvantage (I was low and slow awaiting for them for some manoeuvring tests and all) in the end (didn't take long) got them coming from the stratosphere in a mad B&Z, they thought they would be safe, invulnerable indeed, doing it like that and after all they were flying their almighty 109K-4... in the end they weren't invulnerable after all... They both are really bad pilots, and really bad shooters, they've been flying sims since ever but apparently never managed to learn a thing out of it. Instead, they just suppose just by flying the mighty 109 must keep them safe, sound, and instant aces... but no, it doesn't when you have two left hands...

Don't be fooled, he complains about "users not being realistic", but he uses that exact same tactic since so many years ago whenever he gets somebody on his 6... and I know because I was the one... he got shot down anyways...

Otto... eso no es un P-51 volando como ningún OVNI, es que eres TACO DE MALO macho... Otto... that's no UFO flying P-51, that's you being a REALLY BAD pilot mate...

Yep, DCS maps, as said by developers many times, are still flat but they're mathematically corrected for navigation, coordinates and all to look like you have an actual round navigation. I guess going to those extremes, although not impossible as you just demonstrated, makes the game somewhat crash even though not properly crashed. The global actually round map is on the works, but it's a long term project yet.

yep, let's await for it

Shvaks in this airframe wouldn't be "an upgrade", they'd be a new aeroplane. Cannon version wasn't the type 24, but type 28-29, and those versions had quite a few more changes than "just" the wing cannons.

Quite true, although I suspect it's not that easy when they're working on a quite complex new module which probably will help them get out of the problem of being a small team. If Corsair is a huge success they probably will be able to enlarge the team and dedicate more workforce to MiG-21 v2.0 and other future modules. That's luckily just a question of time until Corsair is ready to release. If they move to the MiG-21 instead... well I don't know what the outcome of that might be... Anyhow, mates you're probably being a bit unfair here... comparing literally the last state of the art DCS module like F-4E is to the very first third party module ever released in DCS (remember, 2013-4 folks), isn't perhaps quite fair to be honest. And yet, even being 10 years old, it's a module used on a daily basis, with problems or not, and it still has it's appeal and still holds compared to other modules released later which aged even worse. To me that's quite an statement over the quality this module boasted back when first released. But yes, 10 years later it's in the need of an overhaul, no question about that. But let them work and finish their projects mates. A bit of the good old long lost patience would be helpful here, wouldn't it?

Yep, quite usual old tutorials get broken over time whenever one tries to use them many years later. It's a shame but I guess the long term maintenance for old modules isn't easy for small teams and MiG-21 is the oldest module from a small team. Anyway, as you say, there are plenty of tutorials out there nowadays. The big problem with this, and it happens to other modules as well, is not only they're stuck working other modules by now but as they plan a v2.0 of the module it's probably worthless to spend a lot of time (stopper bugs aside) with this module when there'll be a whole new module out of this one in due time with newly done tutorials. I'm not there but I guess that's really problematic for your schedule when you have limited resources.

Looking really good!! eagerly awaiting for it.

Se os echaba de menos compañeros . Un saludo

En la web principal hay una pestaña "ayuda", y dentro de esa hay una que dice "tíquets". Te pongo el enlace pero como son varios subenlaces y depende también de si estás logueado previamente, o no, no sé a dónde te llevará exactamente. Espero que al sitio sin más. Sigue las instrucciones que te van dando, ahora está todo traducido, aunque el tiquet seguramente lo debas poner en inglés, no sé, https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/es/support/

There is no switch in real life, it's just a mirror there . Freezing the mirror, so no updating the image, is like turning it off (which you can't turn off a mirror IRL), so it won't take resources or frame rate away if you need those extra FPS. Just that. What else would you want? If you prefer the black image just don't turn it on in the first place, there's no need.

Thanks for the video. I see, tail wheel is locked but aircraft behaves like it's unlocked. The stuck tail wheel, well I believe I never came across that problem, I don't know what it might be related to, but yeah, it's not operable when like that. Besides, I see there a problem with exhaust flames, perhaps your graphics drivers aren't up to date? or you didn't delete your FXO and Metashaders2 folders in Saved games/DCS folder? Don't know but that's not looking right. Perhaps @NineLine and/or @BIGNEWY want to take a look at that, even though it'd be probably a thing for a new report since the "old one" was just a mishandling. You might need to upload your logs and all on top of the video.

Could you explain further? in 2021 it wasn't an issue, indeed, but user mishandling.