Ala13_ManOWar

I'm sure it was, I'm just telling what happened while I was watching . The inners of it are unknown to me. And probably the 2009 BS1, which I bought in a DVD, was released later in my country (~June 2009) than other places, which was still the usual back then (hard copies distribution and all). When it all started to be in the cloud and downloadable (2012 P-51 first actual module, only downloadable version available), it all started to be synchronized to us all, but until then it wasn't necessarily the case.

Actually, BS1 happened in 2009, A-10C in 2010, and DCS World (not called like that at first) started in 2011 when a patch made those two "modules", back then still independent games, compatible online between them. Yes, day one here, but Flanker 2.5, Lock On, FC 1 and 2 where also around there.

Looks great, indeed. Eager to see it in my computer .

Beautiful landing mate .

Yes, totally, and what about the great and marvellous ritual of bearing with the bugs you just bought for ever when there never were patches at all .

Yeah, I get it, but bear in mind that "seven years development" rhetoric is just something people say, it's part of the hype created by some people, not the real thing and certainly not teasing and hype created by the company, not at all. M3 haven't teased us or created that hype mate, it's people who made it happen. The third party might have said time ago that they were looking forward into creating an F4U module, so long time ago it was even another company named Leatherneck and had many more people in it as already mentioned here. Changes in the company made them take a bit more of time than they could have expected, yep, totally, but those changes weren't even up to them but to other praised (rightly so, don't get me wrong) third party out there. That's a very different story than "M3 company is working on the module since 7 years ago and they didn't deliver yet". They couldn't have been working 7 years on it because M3 didn't even exist 7 years ago in the first place mate... M3 never really teased us, just communicated their intentions, what they were trying to do, just that, and really started working with their limited resources maybe 3-4 years ago. The hype came later with people imagining things the company never said. Funnily enough the hype didn't even exist 7 years ago, so many people weren't that happy about a Corsair in DCS, they just thought it useless and another orphan module, if you remember those times (I do). And remember about all of that, yes, I'm still eager to see this module in DCS, but that eagerness is just mine, they didn't made me eager, expectations make people eager, sometimes unrealistic expectations and too much talking. So why would I blame them for something I created myself? That's what many users do, blame the company for their unrealistic expectations and hype they created on their own. Just that. It's human psychology apparently, but one I don't share, and one I don't like to be honest.

We await for it!! Looking good Maligno .

Forum account, I guess contact some moderator/admin. Gaming and store account, you've a button in your profile, but your modules will get lost. You can transfer them though if you're shutting down the account.

Hmmm, yes, Ok, agree teasers should be treated more carefully. I don't recall many teasers about the Corsair yet though, not alike other happy trigger third parties for sure (remember the social media and teasing info is only up to the third party, not to ED or the whole game). Yes, the time should be correct for the teasers trailers and all that stuff, totally agree and I'm no expert in communication to know when the time's right (and anyhow I'm not that eager as others, TBH, but I see it clearly for the noise and hype some people create out of thin air), but I believe aside from a few pics more in the line of "it's coming people, we're still working on it", and that only due to some people saying it's not coming because it's taking long, but still the Corsair hasn't been teased at all the same as other stuff in DCS, at all, so, why the ringing bell again? I believe you're mixing here people's personal feelings and the actual hype and teasing and all they create, but that's people, I haven't seen M3 creating that hype or constantly teasing us at all. So, still I can't see any bell to ring here, it's an upcoming module, it's not there yet, I haven't paid a cent yet, the time I pay good money for it and it's not there it'll ring many bells. Not for me yet, whatsoever. As for right now I just await patiently, and eagerly maybe, yes, because it's a historical and important aircraft for a theatre unseen to the day in DCS and I'd like to have those WWII carrier operations in DCS and that's only me, others maybe it's for different reasons, but bells? I can't hear any. Think of it as this, even if the module, and this is totally a worst case scenario I just bring here, a supposition, gets totally carried away and it finally doesn't make it to DCSW, then... what? it'd be a waste of time, effort and money for the third party. As for me personally (and sorry, for everyone here just awaiting the thing) it wouldn't change my life or anything else. The third party would be the hugely disappointed and wasted for their huge effort for nothing. Me, or any other end user here? It's no real loss, just the eagerness for flying the thing, but then again I never had it before, so why the fuss? They investing their effort, time and resources, including economic resources, would be the only ones really hurt. But we users? Why? I had nothing and I'd have nothing the same, and still without spending a cent. So, bells?

Me alegro. Pues ahora si los quieres de vuelta tendrás que ir poniendo uno a uno a ver cual es el que da el problema.

Prueba a hacer repair, por si ayuda. Quita los mods que tengas puestos, al menos desactívalos por si es alguno el que da problemas.

Well, that's true. But I haven't paid a cent for a Corsair yet, you know. What alarm should it ring exactly? the only one should be the "it's not coming" (which we know untrue, the pics and vids are there, not as often as we'd like, sure, still there) and... I haven't paid a cent yet, the day I'd bought a module and without my money in my hand I got nothing that'll ring a bell for me, sure it will. Until then I can only wish them the best and an as fast as possible release since I'd like to fly that bird for sure. Anyway, the criticism here looks like it's whining about a module have disappeared and they run with my money, or the like. I haven't seen that yet mate. Why would I feel entitled about something I haven't bought yet? Can't understand that part. Eagerness for having it, Ok, complain about not having it like I already paid something... hmmm... nope...

Hahaha, bully you? you don't know what bullying is mate. I'm just telling you what you're obviously missing here. Yes, we all have wanted and wished that to be a reality and all, but remember back then (it's not only you who goes well back to the 80ish-90's since started flight simming ) the sim was quite a different thing. Original Flanker 2.0 and 2.5 (the real starting point of it all), Lock On, LOMAC, the FC 1 and 2 addons, were all quite a different thing, a really humble try to make something really good but still small and with few resources, trying to, compete? not sure they really competed at all, with FC4 . BS1 (2009) still as a standalone product, and later on A-10C (2010) standalone as well, only became "modules" inside a wider platform that they ended up calling DCSW (because at first that wasn't the name, if you recall) in 2011. Those DLCs were just a starting point for the actual DCSW, but that was only from 2011 onwards mate, your whishlist post is from the LOMAC times in the old forum!! What I'm telling you is you cannot asume your post, a whishlist as there has always been whishlists on these forums (and your actual post from 2010 is a proof itself for that ), cannot be taken as ED's starting point for their Dynamic Campaign work just because it's your post. It's only a proof that we all (remember, we all, not only you mate) have been longing for a DC since many time ago. But the product that ED had back then wasn't even close to the standards ED has set for the current DCSW, which back when it started to be DCSW (in 2011) was no more than a wish for what they (ED) wanted it to be one day. Now, and only since recent years, the huge and really ambitious idea they had in mind of a whole simulator, in times when simulators weren't that appealing as back in the 90's, let's face it, is starting to get closer to what they could have in mind. And now yes, DC campaign is a must for the platform they have now and what they have achieved in this time. But lucky you (and we all, yes) they know it's a must and it's something they've also wanted to have since many time ago, 4-5 years ago they started working in a DC and now it's really close, only lacking MT and Vulkan for it to be completed. One of those is now also running, not still used as only option though but working, the other isn't far away. I don't know when the DC will happen, but to me it looks like after many years something big is about to happen. The only difference between you and me is I recall where I come from and realize where we're now. Would you call having memory to bully someone?

On paper, we're about to get a bunch of Vietnam era modules and the map "is coming" along the way. I'm pretty sure it won't be in two weeks, but in the long run probably, anyway it's there and apparently we'll see it in due time which usually is very late for eager customers, anyway...

Wow, great post mate, coupled with a great explanation. Thanks mate!!

Haven't the faintest, never noticed. Probably some aerodynamic stuff. Maybe a fence for the aileron hinge right behind? at high speeds sometimes it's a problem when airflow comes in between control surfaces. But no idea. Hope some fellow member knows about it. Intriguing.

Sorry mate, as usual people tends to forget quickly. HB was a part of Leatherneck and they abandoned the team leaving them alone with few resources. It's not HB is better, it's M3 is what it is right now because since HB abandoned they have been unable to rise their head from the punch. But luckily F4U will be a success so they can finally hire more people and get better after so many years.

So, it seems you aren't very acquainted to scientific method and all that stuff. What it actually means is that wishlists and hype from users can be unfathomable. Development on the actual Dynamic Campaign only started a few years ago, with multi threading and Vulkan as conditions needed, IIRC. Hardly your post from 2010 when DCS still didn't even exist means the start of the development process but one of the endless people's wishes mate.

Looks stunning, Reflected. Looking forward to it .

So true, and so well said. In short, Reddit and all social media fueled by current generations has become pure post-modernism.

Let's hope it means it's really close, even though releases are usually spaced and right now we have had some, and more are coming. Dunno if they'd make so many releases in such a short space of time.

Sí, complicado. Te diría que nosotros tuvimos unos intentos de que la gente lo usase más y se hicieron cosas, pero ahora mismo creo que está bastante parado. La gente tiene los módulos y no los vuelan ni entran a los servers WWII. Sé que hay quien los vuela, aunque sea solos o quizá un par que se juntan, pero poco más. Espero también que el Corsair, el Hellcat, y dos portaaviones de la época, mapa, y assets también le den un buen empujón, porque es algo a lo que le tengo unas ganas tremendas, ya veremos si hay movimiento o lo pruebo yo solo . Me flipa que con la calidad de estos módulos, que son el sueño húmedo del simulador de molinetes perfecto de cualquiera en los 90, la gente le haga tan poco caso. Pero es lo que hay supongo.

Yep, good eye, it's not "cart", it should be "chart" (same root), and still in English that isn't necessarily used as a synonym of map. But it is in other languages.

Happy birthday Lazduc! Wise words of yours .

Yeah, but say it all, they also detail the next areas and speak of several other airports and more that will be included later on during early access, so it's an early access after all, and they also say that "with the current technology we can't go further in extension and details, but as soon as it's available (Vulkan I guess) we'll extend and detail the map even further". So an usual early access with limited detail but not all the detail it'll include in the end, and still they'll expand even more later on, which maybe be not far away since Vulkan should come some day, maybe this year.