Mr. Wilson

@NineLinewe hope you have not forgotten about us...

@NineLine We really hope to see your reaction. Thanks

Nice... @NineLinewhat do you think about it ?

Really? Could you show the rationale? Because as @NineLine said that now everything is done right...

I understand, thanks for the reaction.

I know what rockets are capable of) Thank you) But I'm interested in my two questions...

A few questions about this weapon @NineLine @BIGNEWY 1) Will there be an expanded list of settings for these weapons? Now you can only change a single or paired launch. There is a real lack of setting the amount in a salvo... Or a rocket launch while the button is pressed, will any of this be done? 2) With the advent of Apache, other types of rockets appeared, will they be added to the range for f16 ?

@BIGNEWY @Coyle thanks

When missiles are dropped in the TOO mode, some of the missiles do not hit the target... The number of disgraced missiles in different situations is different, but in this case only 1 missile flew at the target, and the other three flew off in an unknown direction. SLAM bug.trk

@BIGNEWY @NineLine Аny news about your investigating?

The task of the test is to determine the dependence of the detection range on the altitude of the target Test conditions: Two jets converge face2face at different altitudes. The attacking jet (F16) flies below the target (Mig29) in the first case and above the target in the second case. Result: CASE 1 -- Fighter h=2000 ft / Target h=10 000 ft / Detection range=19 nm CASE 2 -- Fighter h=30 000 ft / Target h=10 000 ft / Detection range=29 nm I think the result should have been the opposite... The radar against the background of the earth should see worse than against the sky. If this is the right job, I would like to see the comments of the developers. FCRbug.trk

I just hoped that I would see a speed graph to understand its potential in air combat... F15C will certainly be better, but it is not clear how much "E" will be worse.

Ahahha no but I was hoping that maybe some data was published by razbam

I would be interested to see the speed diagrams according to which the aircraft is being developed...

Is it known at the moment how this f15e will differ from f15с from ED in its speed characteristics?

is it known at the moment how this f15e will differ from f15с from ED in its speed characteristics?

Have you tested with SAM S-200 (SA-5) ?

well I'll record the track in the future then) but I have an idea why your range has decreased... I think you set him a low level of intelligence. Write your exact loc and attack range data

I want to upset you even more... I tested it on the example of a battle with a new complex in the DCS S-200 SA-5 and as a result it became clear that the ECM does not help at all )) Short, long or without it, it will attack you the same way from 70-80 miles. I do not add the track file because it is very large.

HSD bug.trk Its track with test

In SAM and STT mode not have target on HSD

okay, but why do we choose the "HUD" function on the DED 2 times? we made the HUD with an active sensor, turned on the MARK page on the DED there is already a HUD, then we select the "HUD" again in a circle (using SEQ)

Track file in the first message moderator please look again @NineLine thanks you can watch the track and see the test results...

I ran into this problem, too, everything is visible on the video, but I still recorded a track for you so that you get maximum information. We could answer the question - Is it planned to create logic for assigning a point on the ground for TGP without using the DED Mark page and VIS mode weapons ? Mark point error.trk