Jump to content

Protos

Members
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Protos

  1. Protos

    IVC?

    I think I spot some of the confusion. Here is what I propose. Most large servers usually have a TeamSpeak or similiar 3rd party comms. I will use TS3 for demonstration purposes. Btw what I am suggesting is hardly rocket science. Any competent coder who knows DCS could pump it out in under a half day. - TS has the capability to create channels on the fly and assign them different security clearances. So if 'RED' has a certain set of Freqs then pilots flying in 'BLUE' could not enter (this would of course not apply to admins ect ) Example/ Blue pilot adjusts frequency ingame to xxx hz -- ts automatically creates that channel and puts pilot there. Another pilot opens that freq he is automatically put there. Got a flight of Hogs, they can all be on channel xyz ..... Fast movers their channel ...... Switch to ATC you are there ..... ect ..... Thats what a connector would do, but from WITHIN the game. ** The above description was really brief but hopefully clear enough for basic discussion. The connector is just a layer. This way only ONE voice server is needed and since all LOFC/DCS servers are on dedicated boxes it is extremely easy to have it running along side. Bandwidth is a minor concern on pretty much any dedicated box on a datacenter. I too am for Ingame Voice Communications. I just want to make it easy for the Devs to implement. From a programming point of view I can't think of anything simpler and easier to implement than a game connector. If someone has a better idea .... by all means share..... but please have a 'plan' instead of an "I want" Cheers.
  2. Is there a question somewhere? Not sure what this thread has to do with DCS A-10 -- seems like political Off Topic to me.
  3. Protos

    IVC?

    So if I understand you, what you desire is basically a vatsim system for the DCS A-10. That would be a MAJOR undertaking. You could get about 85% of the functionality with a connector, for less than a 1/10 of a single percent required for what I believe your asking for. But hey who knows, I have zero experience with FSX online. More power to you if you know how to make it happen. I certainly would not be opposed - but I don't think current DCS is capable of doing what you want.
  4. Yeah it worked so well with BS that they went and ported it to LOFC2 ;)
  5. Protos

    IVC?

    All of that could be simulated with a connector. Someone would have to be in the channel/frequency for you to have 'live' atc. Perhaps you could be more clear about what you envision.
  6. Protos

    IVC?

    Don't even need IVC ..... not that I wouldn't love to see it . PROPERLY implemented. However why reinvent the wheel. TeamSpeak 3 is amazing. All that is needed is an ingame connector. They have SDKs and game connectors of all sorts. Should be almost painless.
  7. Any way you slice it 2 flyables pounding AI is not going to cut it. I am actually rather optimistic .
  8. Sennheiser HD-555 Audiophile Headphones Zalman Microphone Zm-Mic1 High Sensitivity Headphone Microphone Retail (purchased 3 for spares = since what usually goes on headsets) Tough combo to beat. Got sick of purchashing headsets. Tried just about everything out there. Now I have audiophile headphones and whenever my mic goes its 5 bucks.
  9. I have met many people that 'tried' Free Track. All have bought a Track Ir ;)
  10. Generally good. However I find the Mods section to be a bit disorienting. Perhaps a re evaluation or re sort is in order. I refer to the fact that there seems to be no logical scheme in where the mods are placed. Either seperate mods by category. DCS / LOFC or lump everything in together the way most of the mods currently seem to be in the 'general' section of Mods. On the whole site is better layed out now. Aside for that one minor niggle.
  11. +1 I know its extra work, but rather mandatory at this early stage of DCS.
  12. Its ok ...... for a minute there I was getting worried they were doing so well, that I wouldn't have anything to fight with Wags about :unsure: Let the lobbying for inclusion into FC2 commence.
  13. Agree with tarmac bump mapping being way overdone. Please fix. The russian 'airwolf' held no fascination for me and I never purchased. This one is a definitely going to be added to my sim collection. Actually .... looking forward to it being added to the FC2 world. :thumbup:
  14. Good Post .... doubt ED will EVER give that kind of info out. I certainly would never expose my multiplayer code. It can be reverse engineered rather easily .... but without the source its really not worth the effort to fire up wireshark. I have a feeling that ED is eventually going to go the Serverside route sooner rather than later. Its really the only logical choice. It will just take a while, look how many of the forum people here are flying a 'sim' on a laptop that wouldn't run word 2010 properly. The basic issues have to be addressed first. Lack of a 64 bit client being the first (hopefully soon to be corrected) and then more goodies can come. In the end, we are a boutique market and trying to have airquakers and simmers together is not going to work well. So go whole hog and bring in all the hardcore jockeys from F4 and other titles. That along with the new integrated server browser and the IC checks is a really good beginning. Its all up to Wags.
  15. :thumbup: Linux dedicated server client with server side hit detection scheme configurable for timeout/pkl/clientrate .....ect ect
  16. Nice Aero, Is there a place where your most recent version of your mod is uploaded ?? I have Doctor K's stuff already installed, now just need to plug yours in. Perhaps keep a link in the first post in this thread to your most recent revision ??
  17. Perhaps divide up the Headers by Function as opposed to everything being "Normal Operations Checklists"
  18. I have these, they seem pretty good, but I am not much of an artistic critic. Su-30-33-34 2048x2048 Skins for FC2.0
  19. Perhaps a computer forum might be more beneficial ? You obviously need more support than the average simmer :music_whistling: Out/
  20. after you use driver cleaner you have no driver so that is why screen reverts to different res. Stop spamming. Just follow my directions and you will be fine. I see you have other thread open regarding your computer.... perhaps you should get your gear in order.
  21. F16 Block C Let all the International VPilots fly their bird in FC2.
  22. I gave you specific links to both drivers, not much more than that I can do your you. You can try driver sweeper, it will uninstall both ati and realtek drivers, after you have done that you can try installing the new files I gave you. I didn't watch your videos. DriverSweeper: http://downloads.guru3d.com/Guru3D---Driver-Sweeper-(Setup)_d1655.html This is not really a hard process. Clean old drivers with drivercleaner, install new drivers by clicking yes all the way through.
  23. Here you go, good luck. Hope it boosts your frames, but don't expect much. http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/RedirectFTPSite.aspx?SiteID=3&DownTypeID=3&DownID=10&PFid=24&Conn=3
  24. Go to Device manager and tell me what chipset it is. Then I can search for your latest driver. Most likely the generic driver will work fine, but why take a chance. Also your motherboard manufacter will probably have that latest driver/info.
×
×
  • Create New...