Drona

As mentioned earlier in this thread somewhere, can Leatherback Simulations please consider releasing an closed beta for the indiegogo backers or at least a paid for beta. We have waited too long for this bird.

I can't understand the reasoning behind this no EOS elevation scan? Do the devs have reliable info that the MiG-29 does not have EOS elevation scan? If they do, why can't they share it with us since we are often asked for proof? Anyway, this was posted on the forums a long time back but I'll post it again. KOLS / Izdeliye 13Sh / OEPS-29 OKB: NPO Geophyizika Fitted to the MiG-29A, KOLS is a combined IRST/LR device. All aspect device. Acquires targets independently, or with data input from the radar. Can detect a non-afterburning fighter head-on at a range of 12-18km. The collimated laser can provide ranging data from 200-6500m accurate to 3m. Scanning limits are ±30° azimuth, -15°/+30° elevation. Chart showing KOLS operational modes from MiG-29 combat employment manual Operates in several scanning modes. In large FOV mode scanning is ±30° azimuth, +30°/15° elevation. In small FOV mode scanning limits are ±30° azimuth and ±15° elevation. Close combat mode scans +16° to -14° by 4°. Lock-on mode scans 6° x 4°. Target tracking rate is up to 30°/sec. KOLS is able to reject flares only if the combined signature of the flares is less than the target. Targets are displayed on the same display as the radar. At least from this public Internet data, it shows that the MiG-29 has a operational EOS elevation scan. How can ED just remove it? Really can't understand the reasoning.

If that's the case, then I guess you have not flown against a competent Russian driver as yet. I've seen ER shots taken nearly at Rmax and get hits against F-15's (maybe not in the current version as it stands)

There is definitely a problem with the Su-25A and KH-25ML and I tend to agree with pepin that it has to do something with the Su-25A 6dof cockpit. I've attached two similar tracks with only the aircraft changed from the Su-25A to Su-25T. On the Su-25T, all the laser missiles including the Kh-25ML hit their intended targets whereas on the 25A some hit, and some miss. Su-25T Laser Missiles Test.trk Su-25 Laser Missiles Test.trk

Save those 90 euros and invest it in your future graphics card. An i5-3570k is more than enough for gaming. http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Intel/Core_i5_3570K_and_i7_3770K_Comparison/11.html

You're welcome :)

Please read this.. it was given a long time ago for Warthog 1.1.--something, so I don't know if it still holds true. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=70906&highlight=ati+cheats

A-10 does not have a radar!

download the new installer from here: http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/modules/lock_on_flaming_cliffs_3/

No, we should not resort to these methods. ED should reverse this so-called "fix" or "feature" IMHO.

Can you or ED give an explanation as to why this decision has been made when there is evidence to the contrary? Or is ED just trying to piss off the Russian drivers? :mad:

At least that's something good but I would still like to have the option to choose between the two or have it returned to how it was earlier. I'm sure most Russian drivers would prefer Vertical Scan to remain automatic and TWS to be MANUAL or at least give us the option to choose between the two....

Okay, thanks. Then ED should give us the option to choose between auto and manual. I can't understand the reasoning behind this decision to make VS completely manual!

If that statement is true then ED should give us the option to either use manual or auto. Esac_mirmidon... do you have a reliable source to back up your statement about the two options of Auto and Manual?

Not necessarily! ;)

Best time to launch a missile is when the bandit does not expect it and does not know you are there!

Damn, this should be good! Any more news on this?

No entries as in no LicenseN subfolders? If they have any LicenseN subfolders, I believe you have to delete them. Not sure if it will work but you could give it a try.

Have you bought Blackshark 2 full version or Blackshark 2 Upgrade? There is a difference between these two. If above does not work try this

Yes, it is a nice addition but is there any FPS impact because of this? BTW, there seem to be no news on improving FPS with new patch releases. ED just keep adding stuff. What about EDGE? If you ask me, ED need to stop adding content and just focus on improving game performance.

Nope... it works fine here, ramp start, runway start or air restart. I guess it maybe a throttle issue or just do a repair DCS :)

Don't worry xtaffy, whatever your problem, this community will help you!

1. Yes. 2. Yes. That might be it! Thanks a lot. I will make sure its on and then try again when I get back home! :)

TGP auto-lase fails everytime I release the weapon in this mission.. Any other mission I try it in, the GBU-12 hits the target. I know I must be doing something wrong here, can anyone have a look (I've attached a track) and tell me what it is I'm doing wrong. It must be something trivial!:huh: TGP Autolase Fail.trk

I hope someone can help me out! I've switched to the old Su-27 cockpit as the new cockpit causes huge FPS drops and everything works good except the fuel indicator. I've tested it out in a mission and I found that my fuel indicator reads 0 even though I have around 1500 kgs of fuel left. Anyone have any way or ideas to correct the fuel indicator issue?