-
Posts
688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by PLAAF
-
When you say J-8 gen 1, I assume you meant the old center nose intake variants. Here are some photo for the cockpit of J-8. It was so hard to find. But as far as I know, all J-8 was upgraded to J-8E standards, which I still can't find any picture of their cockpit. I would be cool to have J-8E (the best variant of center nose intake version).
-
Mirage III? I will buy it on day one at full price. It is a must have because it represent the Europe at the 2nd gen fighter era.
-
Hi, I was just downloading the new update a moment ago and encounter this bug. I can't complete the update, and can't play the game anymore. EDIT: Nevermind, somehow restart the computer solved the problem.
-
Firstly, thank you guys so much for the introduction of H-6J. It is such a treat to fly with such a plane. Feel like swimming with a great whale in the ocean. Can you guys please add more so we can simulate more scenarios? I have a few suggestions: 1: HY-6U Aerial Refueling tanker. 2: H-5 Bomber 3: HD-5 ECM jammer The first dedicated ECM warfare plane made by China. This plane will add some fun in the game. I know that currently, the only form of ECM in DCS is the "Background Noise mode". So we can just add it as a much stronger version of the jammer pod carried by Su-27, with much less "burn-through range". 4: Q-5D I know a lot of people would love to see this. Hopefully, one day this can be even made as a full fidelity module.
-
I think it can be fun. Imagining having a friend to watch you back and constantly yelling "We've got one on our tail!! He is getting closer!! Do something!!!!!!".
-
Yes, we have had this conversation a while back. lol
-
Wait a minute, why did this conversation stroke me as a deja vu?? Did we have this conversation already? o_O??
-
If they can get some info from the Bangladesh, it would be even better, since they have J-7G, which is the best version of J-7.
-
I see, thanks for letting me know. I didn't actually know that. But still, it would be good to allow us to link to the KJ-2000. Besides, Pakistan do have KJ-200, so JF-17 should be compatible.
-
You don't need to have a AWACS for datalink. Ground radar can have control and command center too.
-
Let me repeat this again (this is the 3rd time for christ sake), read all comments before reply. Pakistan uses link-17 system, but JF-17 is not for Pakistan only. JF-17 is sold for other nations which has no western datalink, and they are switched for Chinese datalink.
-
I don't think you saw what I commented earlier? Probably you opened this page and left it open before I posted my last comment. Anyway, Pakistan has ordered KJ-200, so they are compatible. And JF-17 is not sold only for the Pakistan, they are sold to many other nations that do no have US datalink and must purchase Chinese datalink. Therefore we should allow our JF-17 in DCS to connect with Chinese AWACS. Beside, in real life, Pakistan has no E-3 nor E-2.
-
No, I meant SCO, not CSTO. I understand your argument that SCO is more general purpose, but nevertheless, it also deal with security issues. For example, China-Russia joint military exercise near Taiwan, to put pressure against separatist movement. China is the founder of SCO, and Pakistan have joined it recently. You may claim that JF-17 in Pakistan was intended to replace F-16, so it uses western datalink. But that's in Pakistan and JF-17 wasn't intended for Pakistan only. Many other nations purchased JF-17 had no US datalink and must purchase a Chinese one. Secondly, Pakistan also have purchase Chinese AWACS for JF-17 too. So, Pakistan JF-17 must be able to link to Chinese system too. It doesn't make any sense that a Chinese plane cannot linkup to a Chinese AWACS, but can linkup to a E-3.
-
That's the issue, how is JF-17 not a redfor fighter? Both China and Pakistan are not a part of SCO, which some may call it anti-NATO. And how does a Chinese plane doesn't use Chinese datalink, but instead, use american one?
-
1: The texture of the drop tanks are often missing. Sometimes can be solved by quit and reload the game. 2: JF-17 somehow can't get its uplink to connect with the KJ-2000. Yet it can link up to the american AWACS. This just doesn't make any sense.
-
Does DEKA have to just do Chinese Aircraft?
PLAAF replied to Hodo's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
I doubt MiG-25 will be the next. Because if they are going to make a high altitude interceptor, J-8F is a far superior one and on top of that Deka has more info on J-8. In fact they have already made the 3d model for it. Furthermore, as far as I know, the poll shows, most people here want J-8F. -
What are you waiting for? We have all purchased 3 copy of it. 1 for self use 1 for keep as a part of a collection 1 for spreading as a religion :P
-
They might, but if they do, the "agenda" won't be what EnvyC implied. Because Taiwan has no reason to hate india. So there is no reason for they to make a propaganda "aimed at Indias acquisition of Rafales".
-
Doubtful, the author of this news is not from Pakistan nor mainland China. It's from Taiwan.
-
Does DEKA have to just do Chinese Aircraft?
PLAAF replied to Hodo's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
no, dude. read that particular post about the J-7 variants, not the first post.