Demongornot

I totally approve with the fact to correct it and about what "213" have say and anyways the major (try to) fix crash and FPS issues don't work : I still crash in multiplayer and sometime in solo too like same the beta and every patch add a new list of bug without correct old or not really... FPS issue its nice but in the BETA version i remember i get more fps than now and when i see low fps for bad graphic, bad hardware exploitation and CPU based fps i ask ? Where is the fps improvement ? And ok the avionic and mechanical system issues are nice (but i see anyways little problems too but not big problem) And just correct the size of an 3D model take 5 minutes...

Yeah another Super Hornet supporter :p !!! Sorry but i don't know why ED will need VRS Simulation... For me FSX its not a simulator, its just a "half realist game" the only one thing that ED can need from VRS its the 3D model of the Super Hornet for win a little time and don't have to do it but anyway ED make better than FSX models, the avionic are bad in FSX, the avionic are perfect in DCS and i'm not sure that the flight model of VRS is correct. But ED team can ask to community to create several 3D model of different variant of the F-16 and of the F/A-18C/D E/F. The best will be selected for new AI model and if the 3D model of the next aircraft is not do (but i think is already done) just take the best and rewrite it a little; we already have great F-15C/E (miss the D) model and no one will know if ED ask that what will be the next aircraft but VRS team don't have so many more to give to ED cause the VRS SuperBug its totally different of what the next DCS plane will be, Hornet or not...

True, anyways the F-16 still a great aircraft but single engine its a big disadvantage, its one of the reason for why no one want to buy the F-35, poor plane :/ And the problem its that the second more recent hardcore sim (exept ED's sim) its Falcon 4.0 AF, no other hardcore sim for modern jet aircraft beween F4AF and DCS A10C and 3 only choice can be F15, F16 or F18 cause its only a US modern jet fighter fixed wing, i don't think that we can have the F22 and the F35 its not possible. And the best is the F-18, why ? cause he can do everything that the F16 and the F15 with multirole capacity and possibility to carrier ops and incredible maneuverability and hight alpha its impressive, that can be so great to see DCS F/A-18E Superbug Anyways i love all this aircraft i prefer the Super Hornet but i will be happy no matter what it is. Anyways i don't think that it can be the F-15E but maybe the C/D version its nice but only air mission its not the best... And finally what about possibility to have single + dual seat variant ? cause a lof of work will be done for coming from single to dual seater and can give us an incredible experience to flight like F-16 (any version) Single + Dual seat, F-15C+D or C+E and F/A-18 C+D or E+F ?

Please everyone...I have already say a lot that the first variant of the F/A-18E/F Hornet don't need secret data... The first Super Hornet before any upgrade have the same electronic than the F/A-18C Hornet !!! From wikipedia : Hughes APG-73 or Raytheon APG-79 Radar Northrop Grumman/ITT AN/ALE-165 self-protection jammer pod or BAE Systems AN/ALE-214 integrated defensive electronic countermeasures system Raytheon AN/ALE-50 or BAE Systems AN/ALE-55 towed decoy Northrop Grumman AN/ALR-67(V)3 radar warning receiver MIDS LVT or MIDS JTRS datalink transceiver APG-73 will have almost 30 years, its an upgrade of the old APG-65 and its the same for every other part of the avionic. From here : http://www.airrecognition.com/index....sk=view&id=140 The Super Hornet's original avionics and software have a 90% commonality with then current F/A-18C/Ds. And anyways if maybe 1 or 2 little things are classified its just can be deleted by ED, the military version of DCS A10C its not the same than the civil and the Super Hornet its older than the A10C !!! The data of the F/A-18E Super Hornet are NOT classified for the first version, ok the upgraded version yes, but the first its not and we can have it !! And its better than the F/A-18C/D for several things, including more weapons capability. The E can carry 1000Kg of weapons, for strike mission 6500Kg on take off, 150Km mission range and for air superiority mission at 240Km of the carrier can flight 1h more than the F/A-18C Weapons : C 7031kg, E 8051kg Take off weight : C 23541kg, E 29937kg Range : C 466km, E 627km And endurance for air superiority mission at 240Km from the carrier C: 1h15, E 2h15 And important thing, don't forget that ED have a contract with army, and Army don't want to training pilot for old aircraft, Army want modern aircraft, and with the first F-35 now in service the most will be to prepare pilot with Multirole Fighter Aircraft Carrier Capable, Multirole FA ? F-15E (but for ED only multiseat version can make problems) F-16 (nice but single engine and ED always done tween engine) F/A-18C/D Yes but too old for military... The only one that its will be logic to have, the F/A-18E/F Hornet, and the best will be the E AND the F variant, in solo mode, with stupid AI, its better to flight with the single seat, and in multiplayer, mainly for squadron, the dual seater will be great and a fantastic experience ! Super Hornet are so nice <3

Of course i love a lof ot things about this sim, even too in the graphics i think that every new 3D model are really great, so beautiful with nice details and texture, extremely realistic flight model and avionic, weapon simulation and more good things, its a really nice simulator and when i talk about it with people who love aircraft i council us to buy it cause its really nice and ED team do a nice work and i have too create a facebook group where i talk about new of DCS A10C cause i love it. But we have several big negative point like graphic render/performance, bad AI, big problem with patch and SDK missing... And with SDK we can see incredible things including graphic improvement, the most perfect example its GrandSurf, look that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8scXSG3hF3Y Its just beautiful to see what he have done and its hard for people like him who want to do that without SDK, with SDK we can be able to see a lot of addons incredible like that, new effect, vapor in wings, new sound, nice animated ground crew and more... Imagine the pleasure to flight with a simulator where the tree the building and the texture are advanced like the addon of Grandsurf but everywhere on the map, maybe too adding reflexion and nice effect like turbulence when we pass behind another aircraft and more, changing the size effect in final render and other possibility that community can do, the possibility if a team like PMDG give us a full simulate realistic model of KC-135 with possibility to make the boomer... And with the Combined Arms its more logic ! DCS Series and Flamming Cliff its a great series of simulator yes of course but we can have better for several point and actually we don't exploit the real possibility of a simulator like that and its sad... I'm not compare to another sim, i just say, the graphic render are BAD that all, compared to everything you want that not change, i not compare to one or to other sim or game, i compare to EVERY actual graphic POSSIBILITY, and i just can told you that we can have better and if even for the actual bad graphic we can without problem use it, yeah i just get to don't talk about, but we have bad graphic rending and that need a supercomputer from the NASA to work, and with the bad optimization i don't be sure that the supercomputer with 5 thz and total compatibility will not have 0.1% of the CPU exploited for only 5 FPS at the end... But i can too compare and say : the new Seven G with the ugliest graphic engine ever 100 time worst than DCS including vapor on wing and the wing flexibility during high G and nice pilot head movement, the vapor effect the community ask it to ED team since how many time ? idk, but since long time... For another sim the new Combat Helo have a nice graphic engine, its not at the level of a FPS graphic engine (fps who are made for simulate HUMAN EYES and not a simple camera, it just must be the standard for every game/software) the graphic engine Outerra its really nice, the including physic engine are really nice too and it can be improve for support DCS complexity.

Yeah happy 2012 to you ! Same wish, but the problem its not that the software its not optimized for multi-core, the problem are that and more : Not optimized for multi-core CPU, bad exploiting CPU power, and over both of this bad things, the most stupid thing i have ever see, a "game" where the FPS are limited by the CPU power and without the possibility to exploiting correctly the CPU. Over that add a graphic engine where the graphic card are exploited like a s..t without Crossfire/SLI possibility and now you have a nice simulator (with a fantastic number of bug, its just the single software where a patch don't really correct actual bug and add a new list ofbug) with super bad optimization, resulting low FPS for VERRY BAD graphic render and people who think that its normal... I have see stupid thing like : for the same scene (exactly the same and i have make a screenshoots) with same angle of camera and everything in same (during the "training" of A10C presentation) I have testing with several graphic option, with and without Eyefinity, and i have see in one scene a high setting config give me MORE FPS than low setting, its just IMPOSSIBLE for a graphic engine with correct optimization...Even without optimization too its not really possible to see that in another graphic software and i don't talk about a minor setting config bug literally the from the minimal at the maximal possible at the same screen resolution... And after i see people who try to defend the graphic aspect and say me that we can't have a better graphic render cause to visual range in this graphic engine, ok and i just will ask to the same people, if its really a important point ? why when, for the same scene, resolution and graphic setting, i change the visual range setting, the FPS have a minor change ? Inside DCS we have a big proof that they have wrong and anyway say things with no sense when i compare graphic engine of DCS with other and told : other graphic engine can't simulate and do what DCS do...Yeah, but no, its a GRAPHIC engine, not a physic engine or other part of the software, we can use the graphic engine from Nintendo 64 (and we will get better graphics rending) or minecraft graphic engine, that will not change, its not the graphic engine who simulate... Add to that a simulator where the visual effect like explosion smoke impact and more are from LOMAC without any little eye candy and lets people for who graphic are important for immersion and don't care about, ok we have now a new list of really nice 3D model for several things, but that not change the fact that we have really bad ground texture at every altitude with any graphic setting config and the original texture including in DCS are not bad but its not exploited, we have bad ground object and tree where the 3D model have already be better in the Super Nintendo or in the actual gameboy and with a size effect who give the impression that we use a RC model simulator when we see a big cruiser boat look like a 15 Cm plastic model and why we have no more good 3D model ? cause 1 ED don't have the time to made new 3D model but try for us to do that and 2 cause ED don't give us a good SDK where we can "easily" made new ED model ourself (i don't talk about 3D modeling software but about the 3D model integration, adding new animations and more and even add too new airplane (not just replace it) cause with SDK we can have an extreme new number of nice addon, look at FSX how many addon we have with new aircraft really more complex than default aircraft and a lot of good things, the same thing can be possible for DCS at one big difference, ED team talk with community, well we can directly help them and they can ask us a new 3D model, effect and more and no one can have access to source code anyway, the only thing that an SDK can do its to give us a better sim and attract new client for ED without for them need to do more things cause community can do it... I with have the same graphic rending : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apVq20stxZQ (turn sound down) And i DON'T talk about the same graphic engine or the same graphic level on the ground, just the same render for the same altitude and its TOTALLY possible actually, we can too have better but i think we most don't ask so much but a graphic engine optimized : first for the maximum speed of the aircraft that we control (actually the KA-50 and the A10C) and why not a little optimized for the more faster object in the sim (missile) but actually with external camera i have really little difference in FPS against free camera at plane speed and extreme speed like more than Mach 10 or cross the map in less than 5 second (i have free wheel mouse). Add over that a really extremely bad AI who never work correctly and we have DCS... Well my wish list ? _Real graphic engine, not joke, i hope the next that we will have soon don't will do same bad thing... _Correct size effect, stop the RC aircraft simulator _Correct (i wish say "legal" :D) graphic effect _More optimization... _Graphic engine don't based to the CPU power _Better graphic render _SDK with tool for AI _Patch who correct bug, and not reinforce them and add a new list of their friendly _Correct AI, not stupid thing commit stupid suicide, never work and fly a fighter jet aircraft like an AN-225 or an 747 with a minimum of strategy, realistic procedure and realistic flight phase and not see soldier who don't try to run or stay cover when under attack. That must be done one day anyway...

Next DCS Airplane SU-34 with possibility to use toilet and to make food !!! :D I imagine in real life the guy saying : ok wait i need to go to toilet, don't go crazy, don't make stupid thing please... guy who pilot : sorry i need to turn guy on the toilet : WHAT ? wait !! wait wait wait !!!! NOOOOOOOOOO !!!! Or something like : do you want salt on your steak ? That can be an incredible experience in real life with a good memory after !!

Actually we have the zoom function, that reproduce the binoculars and without a nice animated pilot body with hands and nice 3D model for binoculars, the only thing that ED can do (and will never do sadly) is to made a binoculars style (just two circle for the view) For friendly ID the TGP can identifying them, i know its not perfect but for the moment we don't have more and ED don't really be focus to everything close to eye candy...

I have write a long post about it http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81295 But simple : For me the best, faster and simplest way to obtain a good AI is to give to every people the possibility to totally rewrite with an SDK the AI script, cause ED can't write it alone, its too long and anyway the community will have AI with 2 or 3 good maneuver and no more without possibility to do it by ourself... Another/additional possibility can be something like that i say here : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=80658 The possibility to save into a track what our aircraft do, for, after with another aircraft fly with, example, do a hard flying inside a canyon the first time and after training for extreme formation fly, or make really advanced mission sp/mp... Ok you will say : what is the rapport against the first idea/AI improvement and the second... Its simple, a quick script editor, just we do a maneuver, we record it, we convert it into a script and we complete it with informations/condition, and like that we can really faster make a good and complex maneuver for AI script, that can open a lot of possibility and give to AI extreme good skill in dogfight/AG strike, SAM evasion and other maneuver, can be use for thing like : breaking formation, advanced strike like that : , useful for people who make video, and a lot of various possibility including helping ED for make a good simulator and obtain several maneuver that ED themselves never have the time to do...

Yeah nice reference !! The Super Hornet is the best !!! Like i have already say, the best will be the single and the two seat version. Multiplayer = Two seater more used but single seater used too but less Solo = Single seat more used but two seat used too less And if one are done, the way to coming to the second don't be long, don't need to reprogramming everything like if it is another aircraft, a lot of work will be done...

Yeah the best will be : the F/A-18 Hornet (multirole and carrier capability) the E Super Hornet will be better, after that, make something like the old project AH-64 for equilibrate with the Russian helicopter, and after the next DCS aircraft the Russian equivalent. F-16 -> Mig-29, F-15 -> Su-27/30, F/A-18 -> SU-33 Same thing for the flying legend !

Nice but that can be a simple part of my idea http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=82457 =)

Typhoon its a nice aircraft, i love it, but its impossible like the Rafale, the F22 Raptor or the F35, its so modern aircraft, or it will be a semi simulator totally unrealistic with a lof ot things missing and spoiled, the Hornet still really nice and the next aircraft will be an US fixed wing fighter plane.

Its not new, DCS its one of the rare software where every patch adding bugs !!! :megalol: If ED give us an SDK everyone who know using .lua and a minimum of programming will make eye candy and every secondary things and ED can be focus to the most important part of the simulator... And maybe the next aircraft can coming faster with that !!!

I want to see the P-47 Thunderbolt, Spitfire and P-51 Mustang :p But, to be honest i prefer see jet aircraft for the flying legend, like Vietnam war, F-4, A-6, A-8, Mig19 or Mig21, Mirage III, or maybe something like AV8 Harrier or the best F-14 Tomcat ! And i don't imagine old aircraft like WW2 Warbird in one of the most realistic and modern aircraft simulator, we don't will flying long time in a modern warfare ^^'

The patch 1.1.1.1 is here !!! Now we wait for picture and announcement of the next aircraft and/or the next flying legend aircraft !!

Never forget : always give the choice, ED must NEVER DELETE a function, but make an option for switch against the first to the second !!! Any one will be happy I know a big page with a lot of options can be boring but its better to have the choice for everything rather than have a minimum of options and don't have what we want... This idea are nice, more realist and can help you to not confuse and sometime make big mistake in flight.

I lot of things lets me think that the next will be an Hornet, i don't know if that will be an hornet or an super hornet, and maybe an F-15, but i don't think that can be an F-16 for a lot of reasons, and Ed have always make a dual engine and anyways ED have already and since long time begin to programming it, we don't really have any choice, we just can say what aircraft we want, i prefer the super hornet but i will be happy with any modern US fighter... But for the next aircraft 3 thing i wish... The vapor effect when the aircraft break the sound barrier, and a nice effect plz... The vapor effect on the wings when the aircraft in humid day have the rapport speed/AOA for do that and if the next its an hornet to see TWO vapor effect, the effect on the wings and the effect on the fuselage, its not the same, and when the hornet have the sonic cone (in real) we see too the vapor on the wing we clearly can see it here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQDJGlewGIU And last thing if the next is an hornet/super hornet, see the wing twist and vibrate like in real cause its a big particularity of the hornet, its cause this wing are flexible that tne NASA have using the hornet for the X-53 active aeroelastic wing program... Just for information the simulator Seven G (with bad graphic rending, look so old) have the vapor/wing flexibility effect... Maybe its only eye candy but its important for a lot of people and we ask the vapor effect since really long time...

The Harrier can be interesting for Flying Legend aircraft, but i think the US army never will ask for an harrier, the next aircraft must be rescent its maybe why ED make the Flying Legend i think, for make us aircraft 100 civil and not a civil from a military simulator adaptation.

Like i have say several times the F/A-18E Super Hornet (and the F version too) don't need to find classified data for the first version, technically its possible to see it for the next DCS aircraft, but for the last upgrade of the Super Hornet and same for the G use classified technology and like Sobek have say DCS for the moment can't simulate advanced jamming system. But what about make two version of the same aircraft ? single and two seat ? If its an Hornet (C or E) make too the D or F version ? For single mission the user must using the single seat cause i think Human pilot + AI copilot or worst AI pilot + human copilot...That will be really bad cause actual AI are not really good, the AI will never firing correctly and make that without any realism and will piloting so bad like a Boeing 747, do stupid collision and the flight will be boring... But for multiplayer the dual cockpit can be really nice, with integrated command for talk directly with the crew without spaming general teamspeak/skype team conversation. The single and dual seat have several difference but a great part of the programming will be done, same thing for F-15C/D Eagle and the F-16 too. A lot of people want to flight alone but a lot too will want to experiment the dual seat.

Stop to say that the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet its impossible, like i have already say a lot and a lot of time the first Super Hornet before any upgrade have the same electronic than the F/A-18C Hornet !!! From wikipedia : Hughes APG-73 or Raytheon APG-79 Radar Northrop Grumman/ITT AN/ALE-165 self-protection jammer pod or BAE Systems AN/ALE-214 integrated defensive electronic countermeasures system Raytheon AN/ALE-50 or BAE Systems AN/ALE-55 towed decoy Northrop Grumman AN/ALR-67(V)3 radar warning receiver MIDS LVT or MIDS JTRS datalink transceiver APG-73 will have almost 30 years, its an upgrade of the old APG-65 and its the same for every other part of the avionic. From here : http://www.airrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=140 The Super Hornet's original avionics and software have a 90% commonality with then current F/A-18C/Ds. And anyways if maybe 1 or 2 little things are classified its just can be deleted by ED, the military version of DCS A10C its not the same than the civil and the Super Hornet its older than the A10C !!! The data of the F/A-18E Super Hornet are NOT classified for the first version, ok the upgraded version yes, but the first its not and we can have it !! And its better than the F/A-18C/D for several things, including more weapons capability. The E can carry 1000Kg of weapons, for strike mission 6500Kg on take off, 150Km mission range and for air superiority mission at 240Km of the carrier can flight 1h more than the F/A-18C Weapons : C 7031kg, E 8051kg Take off weight : C 23541kg, E 29937kg Range : C 466km, E 627km And endurance for air superiority mission at 240Km from the carrier C: 1h15, E 2h15 The Super Hornet its possible to have and its better than the C/D !!!

Don't touch my F/A-18E Super Hornet Its POSSIBLE !!! :mad: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1354524&postcount=4341 Super Hornet in the first version, before upgrade have the same avionic, radar and other thing that can be classified than the F/A-18C, just modernized but today full declassified i'm sure, and ED can do the last upgrade version for military and the first for us... Its possible to see it !!!!!! But i agree for the Raptor and the Lightning :D

The next aircraft can be an F/A-18E Super Hornet !!! First cause ED make first a military simulator, and after we see civil adaptation, and military don't want to training pilot with old aircraft, and don't forget that the A10C in enter in service since 2006, its a resent aircraft and like the Super Hornet its an big upgrade of the previous version. And second, don't forget that the Super Hornet have know multiple upgrades and the first Super Hornet have an APG-73 like the F/A-18C Hornet, the last upgrade its with an APG-79 and yes the 79 its classified but the old 73 (an upgrade of the APG-65) i don't think so cause we see the 73 since 1980s And its the same thing for every avionic part, the Super Hornet in the first version don't have extremely more resent and advanced avionic than the C variant but more advantage anyways, and with the F-35 with now the first in service multirole fighter carrier capable its, i think what the US Army want most training USAF and too NAVY pilots, the F-15 Silent Eagle will coming but maybe we will able to see the same thing for the F/A-18 if its not canceled. Then, maybe the Super Hornet can be the next aircraft, the F-15E Strike Eagle i don't think so cause dual seat can be a big problem and the F-16 i don't think too... But maybe the F-15 C for only air superiority mission bu multirole its better and ED know that... But imagine if the next is : DCS F-8E Crusader :D

Perfect example, i hope too Another example with FSX If the next aircraft its an F15 or an F16 that could be nice, but if its an F18 its just indispensable +1000

I hope ED will not make us wait more long time before announced the next aircraft...