Demongornot

For combined Arms that will be perfect, for the moment flying vehicle in Arma are really bad and unrealistic, same for AAA and SAM who will engage badly and without priority (will engage tank in priority and who can't aim really aircraft) And in DCS ground vehicle and soldier AI are really bad, see ground AI controlled by Arma and air/anti air controlled by DCS will be the best thing ever. Do JTAC mission with the most realistic ground simulation ever with combined Arms fidelity will be perfect and anyways embody JTAC and any ground unit in combined arms with the ugly graphic engine of DCS will be so bad and be killed cause AI in DCS are so stupid and not matter if we have 100 tank it won't protect us and finally we will die from stupid way in DCS... Ground simulation with Arma and Air simulation with DCS Arma 3 and DCS (next aircraft) with EDGE engine (better than actual but still extremely ugly for ground ops) Thanks for your idea but like always and like every good idea that will not be listen and you will see a long list of people who prefer told you that it can't work rather than find a solution. I hope for us that you will be listen ! Thanks !

I hope DCS/Flaming Cliff will support Crossfire soon (and SLI too) but before that the new driver its really nice with possibility to disable Crossfire for only one application, cause for a lot of game i using my crossfire but for DCS i need to disabled it and manually disabling (with catalyst) cause a lot of time stupid bug with my screen. Same : DCS take so much performance in Eyefinity i need to use only one screen and finally disabled it with catalyst cause the same bug of screen who will be not recognized (due to stupid display-port adapter, ATI are stupid to force us to use Display Port for eyefinity, only one display port... If only both DVI + HDMI can work...Or DVI + two HDMI port... But now i have a simple and fast solution, i manually disconnect the display port from my graphic card and only my main screen will work, the disconnected and the HDMI will be faster disabled (catalyst need long time for open main windows), never see any bug and when i plug it again my eyefinity are enabled again :p When ATI and Nvidia will create us crossfire/SLI profile i hope i can finally run with maximum setting (or close to the maximum) DCS in Eyefinity ! Anyways thanks Mustang !!!

Best support will be first see ED give us what we ask, look here : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=85438 Ground crew, explosion effect and wing vapor its a wish since several year, that will give us better sim, same thing for other plane, we see almost US and Russian aircraft, Japaneses and Chinese aircraft are totally miss, Britannic and French aircraft are almost not here and Germany aircraft are a little present, only one civilian aircraft... AI are extremely bad, look at my idea here http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81295 Multiplayer know always a long list of bug, i have send idea here but like everytime that will be ignored : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=83783 And actual Multiplayer are nice but can be really better, look here : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=84001 When we see that every new patch add a new list of bug and don't correct old and stupid graphic optimization like i have already see, for the same scene (during training mission -> aircraft presentation) i have better FPS number with maximum graphic setting than minimum...And graphics itself who can be really better... When we take all this big problems and we additional it, that give us a realistic but a bad simulator who can completely be better... Before support ED i think ED must have to give us correct sim, mainly when we see the price with things like Black Shark 2 and soon Nevada Map, FC3, P51D and Combined Arms who will be not free...And after that the Next DCS aircraft with maybe again several thing to buy with like BS 3 A10C 2 and other things... But the best way to support them ? Them have to give us a public but complete and good SDK ! With a good SDK we can ourself create ground crew, better effect, correct contrail, add wing vapor, change ATC, improve and write completely better AI comportment, create new map and maybe full earth one day for people who want to create an algorithm for generate terrain with ground level map/VFR map for geometry, IRF map for airport data, satellite picture for automatically find where is city, forest, grass, dirt/sand, rock water and a lot of other thing and for automatically choose the better (closest to real) texture in library, road/rail map for generate traffic, auto generation of falsification of data for don't compromise global defense and finally will compile all this data in a single giant realistic and really nice globe map for DCS. But actually just adding a new map its impossible (except for ED team) But SDK will give us too the possibility to see a biggest aircraft/vehicle/boat/weapon library for AI and will give us 5 type of aircraft : DCS Aircraft (official), DCS Flying Legend Aircraft (official), Flaming Cliff aircraft (official) and Flaming Cliff Community aircraft and finally DCS Community aircraft. Aircraft or Airplane + Rotorcraft... Imagine the possibility be a KC-135 pilot and in multiplayer have another player as copilot and another as boomer who can refuel another aircraft that another player pilot. Possibility to pilot an AWACS and have player inside for watch the RADAR activity, possibility with Combined Arms to really convoy a M1A1 Abram tank that player control with pilot, gunner, loader and chief inside an C-130 who will like in real land on the sand, dispatch cargo bay and take off again... And maybe finally ED can take several aircraft, finalize it for give it a total realism and do a payware aircraft with a community aircraft platform... Everyone want to see aircraft like Mig 21, F-14 and why not A-6, Mirage 2000, AV8, AH-64, AH-1, Mil-28 Mil-24, Black Hawk, KA-52, Mil-26, Tiger and a lot of other aircraft, and its the only way to obtain all this aircraft before 2020/2030... Look how are the basic version of Flight Simulator and how are a version with a lot of addons, we finally see in FSX better addon aircraft than default. DCS can have the same improvement but with difference to see the possibility to integrated officially several addons in the official simulator and finally give us a really more rich simulator who will for the same work give to ED better sim who will attract more player. If ED give us the possibility to create a better simulator more rich with an incredible quantity of thing that we ask since long time and that ED team correct stupid bug and problems, them will finally help themselves... That will be better for ED and for community, and anyways if addon that no one like coming, no one force you to download it, but if a good addon coming, that will be nice for everyone to to download it, including for ED who will have a simulator with better reputation. And its nice to create a P51D Mustang for show the possibility of integrate a WW2 plane inside a modern combat platform, but SDK will permit to create so many addons that the software integration and technology demonstration will be done itself. But like everytime everyone will just critic what i say and finally other will ignore that. Maybe one day someone will understand that i want to give US a better sim and that i have several idea about how do that... Anyways i think its 100 time better to do it than give directly money to ED and anyways we can do both...

Its not the best and its really late (we wait it since long time) but maybe Seven G will coming this year !

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=70978 Better ATC with real air/ground navigation and possibility to take of with wingman, all 4 aircraft something like big plane (tanker, AWACS, Cargo or anything else) and two escort gi.. plane ^^ Civil traffic and yeah ground crew !!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMxTQFTsI5w ED make us wait several year and don't give us it and Grand Surf himself have do it and will give it us when he can, i hope that will coming faster. And i agree with Jona33 its a old wish, like better explosion effect, better contrail (who don't start inside the reactor but after it) and wing condensation. And its maybe time for ED to give us that or to create a public SDK...

http://www.gao.gov/archive/1996/ns96098.pdf I talk about F/A-18C/D and F/A-18E/F and not about Block 1 and Block 2/3, the Block 1 is a modified version of the Hornet C/D for carry more weapon and obtain more range and the Super Hornet Block 1 have the same technology level and avionic than the F/A-18C/D for a lot of reason including a stupid reason : the development cost of the new avionic are not be integrated in the development cost of the aircraft. The cockpit are modernized but that all... And anyway that not change, under military contract classified version of DCS will use modern technology and integrate weapon like AIM-9X, i know A10C do that, civil version will not include that, Army can have the Block 3 variant and finally civil variant will be the Block 1 and a lot of data will be programmed by military programmer and not ED Team... Exactly like the military version of DCS A10C are not the same than the civil version and if the next aircraft will be the F/A-18C/D Hornet that will be nice too but military will have the lastest upgrade and civil the declassified upgrade... I want finally mean : its totally possible to see the Super Hornet, and anyways the civil simulator not need to be 100% accurate, anyways with stupid AI and the big list of bug that now will change a lot of things about realism, its only for private usage and not for training people... But its totally useless to ask a simulator of F/A-18C/D and i'm sure them already have one. Its like if France ask simulator for Mirage 2000 or Mirage 3... Why not Russian Army ask Mig-21 Simulator for training pilot...

Ok you have create the Super Hornet technology and official government website and PDF are inexact... Why you don't send an email to every website in .gov who talk about the Super Hornet and say to American Government : you wrong, we know your aircraft better than you... Go look yourself, look for Super Hornet Block 1 at every website and PDF in .gov

@GGTharos You told me that every internet website lie about the avionic of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Mk1 ? Look at several website and look the avionic present on the Super Hornet, its the same ! look wikipedia and any website -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_F/A-18E/F_Super_Hornet The RADAR the RWR the Datalink the Jammer and a lot of other thing are exactly the same, i don't talk about the Super Hornet Mk3, i talk about the Mk1 ! I don't think Russian government can ask without big diplomatic problem with the USA to create a full simulator based on an American modern aircraft, the next aircraft its under military contract and its a US fighter... @Eddie That want mean that US Army use a F-104 simulator for training pilot ? Why training pilot for aircraft who will be retired in several years and when the country power depending of the modern machine... For basic familiarization ok that can be useful, but that all and US use training aircraft... @Spook Ho god please no !!! for Flying Legend yeah but not for the next DCS aircraft please...

I have already say a lot of time that the first version of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet (Rhino) have almost the SAME avionic than the F/A-18C, something like 90% in fact, nothing are classified, the Super Hornet are nice that can be really nice to have it and the A10C its from 2006 and the Super Hornet from 1999... And don't forget that this next DCS aircraft its a military contract, F-15E or F/A-18E/F ok but F-15C/D or F/A-18C/D i don't see why US Army will need it its too old for a training simulator... It will maybe be using like DCS A10C for training pilot from A10A to new avionic, same thing for the F/A-18E/F... Anyways the best will be a multiseat, F/A-18D/F or F-15D/E !! cause we can anyways flying alone in a dual seat aircraft and we can too profit of multiplayer coop and AI when we want !!!

Ok thanks everyone, my mistake. I hope we will be able to hear the beautiful sound of the Mustang like in my link !

Ok thanks, and the sound engine since BS use a separate thread or its a new feature for reduce cpu charge ?

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=84678 Q: Will DCS: P-51D Mustang use all cores on my CPU? A: Not fully. It does include the new sound engine which operates in a separate thread. I just ask question for know more about that...that's all... And who wrong ? me saying that we can have better thing, or people who told me that thing who ALREADY F...ING EXIST are impossible ? I have show several example of what i talk about, look just that -> http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=85360 I just talk about graphic engine like that and maybe who require LESS performance and people keep told me that its impossible but open your f...ing eyes and see, that already exist damn it !!!! Anyways its not the subject of this threat that i have write for everyone who want information about new sound engine, if its a problem for you just go away with your stupid personality, buy a life and troll yourself =) And when a people try to get better thing for him AND for you a.. too, just close your mouth and say : thanks you. Sorry everyone for his attitude and for my answer to this troll !

Anyone can told us more about the new sound engine ? I think that will be really nice ! Possible integration with DCS Black Shark and DCS A10C Warthog by patch ? We could hear this beautiful sound when the Must pass ? Vibration sound in the cockpit ?

I still hope that will be the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Rhino (mk1) But if its not an Hornet what you will do with your simpit ? Using for another sim or transform it into F-16/F-15 simpit ?

This is the perfect example of what i talk about when i say : nice graphic engine for simulator... But everyone told me that its impossible...Yeah...impossible my a.. Sadly we meet again the small object size effect with tree look too small cause we embody a big camera and not a human eyes... And with great optimization for AIRCRAFT/missile and object who move slower ONLY and not for show full planet, with limited rending speed, according to fastest object (missile) (in DCS i don't have any performance difference between look at a single area without moving the camera and use the free camera at more than 100000Km/h) we can obtain more details due to power saving and finally obtain the same rending than that : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apVq20stxZQ FOR THE SAME ALTITUDE !!!!!!! i don't talk about the same rending that what we hare on the ground in Arma 2 with a soldier but at the SAME altitude than this video. I talk about tree look, color, road, ground detail (like little bust, rock, relief and other detail) And when we look that We can see that at long range (long range for 3D object i mean, not for horizon) (3:00) that if we using only 2D tree and building at more than 5Km we CAN'T see difference against 2D and 3D and finally due to pixel tree effect a long range its better to use only ground texture with tree drawn on it at more than 5km like here We can save the performance and obtain finally the SAME graphic rending that what we see in the video of Arma 2 for ground detail with 3D object and the same rending at long range than what we see in Aerofly FS. Same rending than Arma 2 but NOT on the ground just OVER the ground like in my first link and for the rest ONLY texture like Aerofly FS That will take LESS performance than your video cause that will use LESS 3D object and just replace ground texture by another who look like Aerofly FS. For Aerofly FS i ONLY talk about the texture realism, its only a texture, but it a must have cause its look EXACTLY like real life, people can keep saying that "photorealism don't are realist due to condition and shadows" and other stupid things but its still be MORE realist and finally 1000 more attractive immersive and beautiful than actual DCS and other who don't use "photorealism". But people still told me its impossible and after see this video will continue to told me that... Its why i stop to answer to my topic : Graphic Engine, people boring me to say : "its impossible" for thing who already exist...

Sorry but in Wing Of Prey the terrain are great, its not a small terrain and i don't care about the size of the map, th important thing is the visual range and its totally correct in WOP And anyways ok then what about IL2 Cliff of Dover and the best example Rise Of Flight where the graphic engine are sublime compare to DCS and where visual effect are nice and the visual range are great with a really big terrain ? I just say : actual graphic engine of DCS are really bad and i hope EDGE will be really better and not just look a little better and need a NASA's supercomputer for work. And go look at Aerofly FS where the visual range are superior than DCS, the map size its a full country and it can be optimized for better graphic at close range...

Or have the same graphic rending that Wing of Prey where the graphics are just perfect and where we can (without lag) see a lot of aircraft in the sky and a lot of smoke trail and a lot of explosion from several weapon, aircraft crash and flak gun. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qbLeNeodXA The graphic engine in Wing of Prey pare perfect, everything look really great, ground are perfect the effect are 100 better than DCS and we have nice effect like water on canopy when we cross a cloud or oil when we follow damaged aircraft... AND the visual distance are perfectly nice, i wonder see the same graphic rending and effect like explosion that WOP in DCS The problem not come from explosion effect but from DCS graphic engine... I hope EDGE will give us the same (or maybe better) rending that WOP with the same nice tree and not a bad 2D thing !!!

My wishlist for multiplayer is a real dynamic battlefield and not only a single mission http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=84001

Ok after the P51D Mustang i wish see for the next Flying Legend a aerobatic aircraft (best demonstrator ever for physic engine/flight model) Please ED create DCS Extra 300 or DCS MSX-RH or DCS SU-31 !!! That will be perfect !! (we see an A10 and a Mustang in this video :p and if the next aircraft will be an Hornet we see the F/A-18 Hornet from blue angles too ) Actual aerobatic aircraft = Cockpit not a long for create, avionic are not complex, 3D model are not extremely hard to do too, flight model can be hard for an aerobatic aircraft mainly for prop wind effect on control surface. That can be hard but a really fast aircraft to create (compare to other aircraft) I know its not a combat aircraft but that can be extremely nice for everyone to test extreme aerobatic, best demonstrator ever and can be done fast ! :p Pleeeeaaaaaaaaseee !!!!!!

Request clear for formation take off Request clear for touch and go Emergency situation Ground navigation More than ATC we need Mission control center !!!

That depending of the date, i'm not sure but about what i know the merged install will coming with Combined Arms and CA will directly coming with Flaming Cliff 3, if DCS P-51D Mustang coming at the same time than FC3 we will have a merged install for the 3 aircraft and new feature !!! And the Nevada map will coming with the next DCS aircraft with the new graphic engine EDGE and we must have to wait close to half/end 2012 for see the Beta release i think. I'm not sure but i think that will be like that... I hope FC3 will add new flyable aircraft and maybe more advanced aircraft actually flyable (more advanced avionic, new flight model except for the SU-25T who have a great model and maybe clickable cockpit) for balance the difficulty between real hardcore helicopter/aircraft (KA-50 A10C and P51D) with other from Flaming Cliff 3, i hope FC3 will add AH-1 or AH-64 flyable at the same level than other aircraft in Flaming Cliff, that will be a good compromise (and the first step) before next DCS helicopter ! The next DCS aircraft will be a Falcon an Eagle on an Hornet, i hope at the FC3 release the next DCS aircraft will be officially announced and that FC3 will integrate the 3 other aircraft at the same level than other aircraft on Flaming Cliff ! For example : Next aircraft = F/A-18E/F Hornet and in Flaming Cliff 3 : flyable F-16 and F-15E or other possibility... With the combined Arms a good feature can be the possibility to pilot ground vehicle like Hummer or M1A1 Abram or T-80/90 tank and other nice ground vehicle ! Thing i hope too : new explosion/flame/smoke effect, vapor on wings, corrected contrail position at the reactor, better AI, better tower control with possibility to take off with several aircraft in formation, emergency fire truck for runways crash and other fail take off/landing ground crew with more interaction and more possibility and better (more realistic and fastest) pilot control at the ground and possibility to walk from any flyable aircraft to another at the parking for take control !

Haha true !!! And i hope the next aircraft will comming before the end of the world :megalol:

Yeah and we will have the Super Hornet :p Anyways F-16 F-15 F-18C/D or F-18E/F will be nice for the Super Hornet will be really perfect with carrier ops and people who want Eagle or Falcon will finally be really happy to try carrier landing :p A10 and all possible future aircraft are in this music :p And i wish i had the alpha of the Hornet and do what no other US aircraft can do <3 :p

In fact i wonder see that : DCS KA-50 DCS A10C DCS P51 DCS (next US Aircraft) DCS AH-64 + A10A + SU-25+25T + KA-52 + Next Flying Legend = enemy equivalent of the Mustang or Mig-21/F-14 Tomcat DCS MI-24 + Next DCS hardcore aircraft Russian equivalent to the next next aircraft : F-16 = Mig 29, F-15 = Su-27/30 F-18 = Su-33 But if ED create an SDK a lot of fan can begin to create new aircraft that ED can correct after for obtain realistic simulator and come from fan quality to professional quality ! a lof of work will be done and ED can finally give us more aircraft and faster ! And i think we maybe will have too ground unit like tank and other vehicle that we can directly driving and with fan support possibility to have tanker, AWACS and transport aircraft ! Imagine the possibility to have all this 9/10 aircraft in 2/3 years !!!

@Scoggs Yes Nevada its a good place for training and...Red Flag !!!!! :p And thanks for info ! @NPOSuperhornet +1 @bluepilot76 I want to see Falcon too but not now, the last hardcore sim before DCS is Falcon 4.0 AF and open/free falcon...The Falcon can wait a little i think and if ED give us an good SDK a lot of people will try to import the F-16 from Open/Free Falcon and create the the more realistic F-16 than we can get from fan work, that will be long and hard but if anyone who know coding and who want the Falcon do it we maybe will have a Falcon faster and maybe ED will correct it for give us a more realistic and advanced Falcon... And same thing for A10A, SU-25/25T Hardcore and AH-64 project and many more other...