Demongornot

i don't know for you but in my country the grass are green and not a mix between grey and brown...:megalol: (joke) All my first picture is from Georgia and from different season at different location its a big proof, i have see too several picture of Batumi and its the same thing. The biggest problems its the missing green color from grass with nice warm colors and not the actual faded color like if Mister Clean have use bleach over Georgia... The color that we get if DCS are for EVERY season exclude the winter where everything are white (no enough in DCS i think)... Well sorry but the color are not similar to Georgia ground and its similar to nothing cause i have never see color like that on the ground of a full country in real life... And my "pictures from all over the world" proof that the grass are green everywhere on the earth (maybe in another planet too :lol: ) and its mainly for show the ground color from aerial view... So maybe i don't have see the new and herbicide has been using over all the territory of the Georgia and the grass has been replaced by strange think on the ground... And for orange three, i think you must get outside during fall...cause its the tree leaves who change color during fall, its exactly the same thing if you told me that in my last picture of the Georgia the three color are not due to beautiful flower but light reflection with the camera and the green grass is just the only place in Georgia where we have it... Sorry but for my the ground color still incorrect... Watch that : I see grass surrounded the airport Or that And plz don't try to told me that the grass its an reflective effect or that its was added just before filming and cut after... Or like that Its not a problem of sun light but a real big texture color problem, in every season in fact... Its the SAME thing over every part of the Georgia., and the world too, grass don't change color and become grey in other country... And don't forget that for several picture camera (mainly Russian camera) will warm color. Go outside and see watch the color of the first pasture that you find, its how that must be in DCS !

A lot of people want a dynamic campaign, and people want too for multiplayer a dedicated server and apparently ED work on it... But what we will have in the server ? Just several mission, maybe really good and when every target are destroy the server will restart another mission ? And so what, that all ? nothing more ? I have an idea about that... The first step for a dynamics campaign, new great possibility and experience for multiplayer, first step to multiplayer logbook and a big advantage for the future Combined Arms in multiplayer, and too a good thing for military version (but army will modified it for obtain a more realistic version i think) The possibility to have a dynamic battlefield. I explain. A war situation with 2 dynamics coalition and neutral, one big scenario for start like : Russian planed to conquest Georgia but US and European will help the Georgian Army to protect the territory, or another big war scenario, or just a terrorist control or anything else... But the most important thing will be to assign a precis number of aircraft and other forces for every airport, base and airbase (other still neutral until one coalition capture it). Every new player will create a pilot profile and if he die he must create another profile for this server, every player have an assigned aircraft/helicopter, country, grade and squadron but he can be transferred. The airbase have a limited number and quantity of weapons, ammo, aircraft, helicopter, ground vehicle and fuel, only two way to obtain more its to capture it from enemy like steal material, fuel/oil truck or wait for sending of new units from US/EU coalition with real transport and real possibility to see it be destroy and more thing like realistic repair time for every ground/sea and air vehicle with necessity to perform maintenance (vehicle aircraft or boat not usable for a certain time) with real possibility and utility to spy enemy forces by performing reconnaissance mission with spy aircraft or to strike enemy base/airbase and during long time repair from damage caused by capture attempts and necessity to protect it, and everything that its not destroy in the captured base will be captured too. Every captured base will permit to enlarge the capacity off storage for fuel, ammo, weapons, vehicle, aircraft and more, anything can be repair or reconstructed like tower control, aircraft hangar, fuel tank can be replace, runway can be repair and more... The commander of the base can choose to give the material in over quantity to other base or inside secondary base but every excess of ground vehicle ammo and weapon will need to be store at the exterior of the base and if the enemy force decide to try to steal this material they will have a big chance to succeed. Every player with a big combat statistic at General grade will have the permission to create its own base with FARP anywhere in the map (but if he try to construct in at the middle of the enemy territory he will have a big surprise...) with possibility to control and manage every units under its control, like create a flight plan and assign for any player/AI aircraft, ground vehicle or helicopter. If he capture an enemy base/airbase he can take it and give the ancient base to another new general. Every General can create several secondary base but this base can always take the risk to see enemy force steal material vehicle and other important thing but any commandant and superior player can control the secondary base with a limited control and the general can too chose to create an extended base to any existential base/airbase, for base with FARP any general can take helicopter but can too take an A-10C from the closest airbase. An ejected pilot will really take a good importance for rescue mission, same thing for reconnaissance and cargo aircraft finally... Any player if the General are not connected can control the utility of any base under attack, the enemy force can't begin a strike if no enemy general are connected (for avoid to see massive attack without any chance to stop it cause just 1 or 2 player are connected) or why not switch from player to AI but without any action when no player will be connected for avoid AI war... Any pilot with good grade can control if he want an AI flight like player, wingman and flight element but same thing with player who want that, just lets us the possibility to give order to another player an possibility to set player aircraft to wingman or flight element. Any General or Commandment will obtain data from reconnaissance mission and for avoid guy who want to cheat, just set at invisible every enemy unit not detected with external view. Possibility to set player as ATC with good radar view and advanced labels for identified every aircraft easily with interactive order specific to ATC. The Radar view will be with every actual flight and reconnaissance mission a best way to spy enemy forces and to protect our controlled territory. Every mission will be launch by the General, any player can ask the permission to do a flight but the General can decline, that can avoid to see player who will crash just during a free flight and loose force in the base, any general and commandant can in real time assign waypoint for mission for ground and air units, ground units will be AI except for JTAC with combined arms who can be AI or player, and option for launch AI flight or wait for player... Actual virtual squadron can really find big advantage with their own forum for planed attack and give more virtual squadron cooperation. If any coalition control every airbase and strategic point of the map, he have win and another scenario can begin. Every action that player will do can really change a lot of things and every flight not will be useless but will be really important. This idea can give us a new incredible experience and show us the real potential of DCS by really exploiting DCS, Combined Arms, and FC3 possibility ! Ask me for more details or idea about that.

I think an important thing to change its the ground color actually totally bad, false and unrealistic... Look here : Picture from Georgia : http://www.geo.fr/var/geo/storage/images/voyages/guides-de-voyage/asie/georgie/107276-28-fre-FR/georgie_940x705.jpg http://www.clubaventure.fr/upload/georgie_01_cgtt.jpg http://www.gunyah.com/data/dest_18/georgia-tours-travel-gunyah.jpg http://gerg1967.smugmug.com/Nature/Nature/i-2wGDf95/0/L/Georgia-Summer-Morning-L.jpg http://www.slrobertson.com/images/usa/georgia/fall-color/ga-fall-color-3-b.jpg http://activerain.com/image_store/uploads/5/4/4/9/0/ar125673707609445.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Bakuriani_winter_resort,_Georgia.jpg http://www.georgiamountainscabin.com/807f4770.jpg http://harmonoutdoorsinc.com/gallerypictures/Georgia.springmorn.jpg Or from other part of the world : (with a poor color) http://sobchak.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/guv-8700hind1.jpg?w=640&h=483 http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/8630-1/Mi-25s.jpg http://www.marennes-ulm.com/images/aeroclub.jpg http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/galleries/images/38011/500x400/a-10-thunderbolt-ii.jpg http://www.red-stars.org/IMG/jpg/ka50.jpg And more and more... But in DCS everything we get its this color : http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=42333&stc=1&d=1284152038 http://server.niprod.net/dcs/w/ScreenShot_012.jpg http://www.dcs-fan.ru/images/phocagallery/scrin/A10/scrinshots/11-10-2010/DCS.A-10C.sim.beta.build.083.by.Soeren.Dalsgaard.jpg http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_CjFQem7UIVI/TSpz-rcmKdI/AAAAAAAAB80/6r4KeuD7XLo/s1600/Banner.jpg Any season its the same thing the color are unrealistic and decrease really bad the immersion effect Best example with in cockpit camera vidéo : Or look here : I'm NOT compare the graphic engine or the 3D or anything else, just the color and the beautiful effect for the mountain ! With normal green grass and other correct color and good grass proportion in the map that just must be wonderful, immersive AND Realistic ! Please give us realistic and correct color for ground.

That's can be nice but i'm not sure that we must have the same airport compare to the real live for several reason including Georgia security maybe... Cause totally fictional country (or world) not will really change a lot of things... But i agree some people want to see the perfect copy of the airport, personally i still neutral about that. Important thing to change can maybe be the size of the runway, compare to real the runway in DCS are shorter for Batumi...

@Frostiken Thanks for information @EtherealN thanks too for information I keep see several advantage to the Hornet and anyways we will see what will be the next ! And i have never think about the possibility to flying alone in the cockpit of the Strike Eagle, that can be strange sometime but yeah its true the pilot can without problem flight alone (or disable copilot AI) and do coop mission for multiplayer when he want ! But ED Team must add the QF-4 drone for training mission and we lest us say FOX FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOX !! :D More seriously, if for next aircraft we will have a dual seat a great thing to implement will be the possibility to ear the guy with us in the cockpit without need teamspeak skype or other additional software.

+1 The possibility to ADD new aircraft like flyable F-16 or why not tanker too with possibility to embody boomer, AWACS or maybe why not tower control/control center New ground vehicle, new sound, effect and so many more things and sometime really good addons and possibility for ED to integrate it officially to the simulator... Fantastic Addons like GrandSurf airbase mods will be possible at great quantity... Several people will try to made the AH-64, the SU-25T with clickable cockpit, the F-14 and other great aircraft with realistic avionic and flight model ! New terrain, new possibility and a lot of incredible things... That was bad that ED don't even give us a software suit ! The simulator just will become rich with a lot of addons and sometime incredible good things !

Nice idea but only with security like 3 second or 3 rapid click for avoid clicking by error...

Yeah we have exactly the same wishlist and opinion about E and F Imagine how that can be fun too if we can refuel another aircraft with the ARS :p A lot of people who will create Blue Angels skin and virtual BA will coming and video of aerobatic with high AOA !

@Pilotasso Yes but the speed difference against the Hornet and the Falcon depend of the version cause several version of the Falcon are not faster than the Hornet but other are... And the Falcon are extremely stable with a really nice computer assistance, that was nice but that limit the aircraft maneuverability compare to the Hornet, cause the Hornet can take extreme AOA without stall, the F-15 and the F-16 can't. And f we forget training the Hornet never will fight against Eagle or Falcon in war situation, more chance against Mig or Sukhoï and the Hornet are good for fight against Russian plane... @Jona33 The Super Hornet can carry 4 JDAM/JSOW but can carry 7 GBU 10/12/16...10 Mk82/83 and anyway we can take A/G weapon and complete that with AIM-120 for eventual enemy aircraft in the sector... Yeah like that the maneuverability of the Hornet will be really poor, but he can anyway flight high with the maximum payload and drop JDAM from really high altitude, same for GBU and Maverick from long range where the maneuverability are not important first, after for Mk82 or other low altitude weapon...yes, but before use that a high altitude strike are better... And with big payload it still more maneuverability than the A10C and if a bandit will coming any aircraft must have to jettison A/G weapon and eventual fuel tank... Anyways the Hornet still a great plane anyway. @EtherealN Its useful cause in BVR several strategy consist to firing AIM-120 for spam enemy but keep AIM-7 (i know not i was retired) at principal weapon, the number of AMRAAM can really change a lot of thing, mainly against several target, cause with BVR combat its not impossible to see 4 missile firing against a single target... The F/A-18C/D Hornet can carry 10 and the E/F Super Hornet can carry 12 with the 2 additional pylons... And sorry and thanks for the information, i did not know for the F-15 And its a really nice aircraft, fore the Raptor that was the master of the sky but i still think that a dual seat only will be a problem, i wonder see a single seat variant of the F-15E but that don't exist badly... And we already have as flyable the air superiority F-15C with Flaming Cliff, F-16 and F-18 will be better about that... I just hope we will have a single and dual seat variant for the next aircraft (or maybe F-15E with F-15C but that will be complicated) Anyways the next aircraft will be the TR-3B and the flying legend the F-117 or the SR-71 its why we will have the Nevada map :D Edit : @MemphisBelle Yeah i prefer the Super Hornet but i think exactly the same thing !!!

Yes and i hope ED will finish the actual SU-25T and give us the hardcore sim version with full avionic and clickable cockpit !!! :p And more flyable aircraft for Flaming Cliff 3/Combined Arms like if the next aircraft is an Hornet give us the F-16 for FC3 or if the next are the falcon give us the Hornet for FC3 or if the next is the Eagle give us Hornet and Falcon for FC3 :D

Yeah if the next aircraft is the Hornet the aircraft after must be the SU-33 Its exactly that : F-16 -> Mig-29 F-15 -> Su-27/30 F-18 -> Su-33

Both can be possible, the problem of the bug is that at every new patch we see new bug coming... And if ED give us an SDK we will able to see a massive number of features. Actually ED work to several thing, new aircraft for the military contract and soon to the civilian version, Flaming Cliff 3, Combined Arms, bugfix, new feature and Flying Legend Aircraft and Nevada and maybe other thing too. ED are overload of work i find and with SDK we can create our own feature for everyone in the community like flyable F-16 for Flaming Cliff, same thing for Tanker, new texture and effect like wing vapor, new explosion and more impressive thing that ED can officially including to DCS series... And without new feature to create (just the time to transform their SDK into public SDK) ED team will have more time for bug fix and new thing like Nevada new aircraft FC3 Combined Arms and other things...

Its simple, cause people forget and don't think that it can be possible to see the Super Hornet and will vote for the Hornet, maybe 10 people prefer the Hornet to the Super Hornet and a little will prefer the A version cause to the Blue Angel but i don't think its more. The creator of the pool have write : (doesnt seem that possible) Its bad to give a personal opinion for a pool like that cause without write in more people can choose the Super Hornet, I agree for F-22 and F-35 but its totally possible to see the Super Hornet, i have say that a lot of time, the Super Hornet before any upgrade have the same avionic (90%) of the Hornet, if its impossible to see the Super Hornet that will be the same for the Hornet the Falcon and the Eagle too...But its not, the last version of the Super Hornet with new radar and other electronic yes its not possible, or a really little chance to be, but the first are totally possible, the A10C are more recent than the Super Hornet anyway the pool are bad cause it now include the two seat variant, and MAYBE ED can give us two variant of the same aircraft, like Hornet C and D, or E and F Only a two seat variant will not be great for people who prefer to flight alone and due to bad actual AI... So single seat can be nice for people who want to be alone and for campaign and other solo mission, but for multiplayer a dual seat variant can really be nice and give us more and new experience, its why i don't think that it can be the F-15E and the E/D are limited at air air mission, its will be a half good choice...but F-16 can be nice too Anyway Hornet or Super Hornet i will be happy to have the nice carrier based aircraft of the Navy, and Eagle or Falcon will made me happy too... Bu i think the best choice will be the F/A-18E and F Super Hornet Block I with tanker role possibility and nice carrier ops simulation !!! And the F-14 Tomcat for Flying Legend will totally made a lot of people happy or maybe the Skyraider :D but equivalent from other country will be nice, like Super Etandard for France, or the Harrier and other !

The Hornet/Super Hornet and the F-16 have the same speed and the F-15 are faster than both, but the Hornet and the Falcon have a really close performance, the Eagle beat both, but the Hornet can Carry more weapon than both, the Super Hornet can carry 12 AIM-120 and 2 more AIM-9, same thing for A/G weapon, and the maneuverability of the Hornet are limited to 7G but he are more maneuverability at low/medium speed than Falcon and Eagle together...Its hard to stall with an Hornet with big AOA he can still maneuverable and take advantage at dogfight when the speed after loose energy decrease and a dogfight only the first time before any turn both aircraft are at high speed but after the first turn both aircraft reach medium speed and if both climb the combat speed will be low and the Hornet will win if the pilot are good... Look here : But for a simulation the best advantage of the Hornet will be the possibility to do everything, Air to air and air to ground and thing that Eagle and Falcon can't do, sea mission, cause the hornet can carry the Harpoon missile, i know the Falcon too, but the falcon don't have the advantage to take off from sea and the Hornet can give to several people the advantage to do carrier ops. In real live its maybe a second line aircraft in a battlefield but its not when the carrier are already at the enemy door, the army don't will wait that the Eagle and the Falcon will be carry, for naval mission its the first aircraft who are using, same thing for interception of enemy aircraft who coming close to the carrier and ship fleet airspace but beyond missile range, and in real live its still a second line aircraft over ground battlefield but he can without problem be using at primary aircraft and for DCS environment with actual multiplayer, AI and possibility the difference will not really be important against primary and secondary aircraft... And for people who want a good simulator, the possibility to do everything are really important, the only thing that the Eagle do and the Hornet/Falcon can't do its anti-satellite mission but in DCS we don't have any satellite... So the Hornet can be great for people who want do dogfight and BVR combat and any air to air mission, any air to ground mission, and naval/carrier ops, and if you look at The Battle Simulator website you can see a lot of time the Hornet. And the reason of why the next aircraft can be the Hornet is that DCS are the civilian version of the military training simulator and with the new F-35, the Hornet are the best for training pilot for the F-35 and the simulator will be useful for training new pilot who will replace the best pilot of the Navy who flying with the Hornet and who will be promoted for flight with the F-35 cause actual Super Hornet not will be totally replaced and Navy will need new pilot... The only new thing with the Falcon its a new version for export only, ok the F-15 will soon have the new Silent Eagle but the same thing will be done for the Hornet too. Its what i think...

@EtherealN Yes of course but actual explosion in DCS are so big for fuel vapor ignition and so small for fuel itself fire, In the Georgia the air pollution are moderate so we have good oxygen quantity in the air and in summer with little wind a all the natural condition are here, we just need good temperature for ignition, like the truck/tank in fire and a minimal wind for more oxygen but not so strong wind or the air will kill the heat. The best will be to just make a script, with weather condition are here just after a random time have a random chance for see fireball, cause we can't in real time calculate every condition like structure heat and fire potential of the vehicle and more that will eat CPU power, Fireball are not present every time but we don't see fuel truck in fire every day and several time that. My video link are not for show that it can explode i just want to show the difference against a fireball from fuel ignition and explosion like gas tank ^^ Its not a really needed thing but that can be really nice and realistic to see every time little explosion from vapor and after that sometime and if condition are here secondary massive fireball. @Cali I think several people want to see real fireball, maybe we have people too who want see explosion from movie :/ I hate how movie exaggerate everything...

Technically the only difference against explosion and simple burning its the speed of the burning for the same thing, a burning thing like tree paper and more just create eat, fuel burn more faster and create extreme eat and big fireball who can burn people far away but a light shockwave, and explosion like gas or bombs burn more faster and the eat wave create a big shockwave who are more dangerous than the eat... For me fuel its between burn and explosion but you are totally right, fuel create a massive fireball with light shockwave (i thing a good tank like T-90 or M1A1/2 next to the explosion will have nothing expect feel "moderate" eat for people inside but for gaz tank the same armored vehicle like the Russian/US Tank or other can be damaged due to shockwave and if its not the tank can be intact but the shockwave can kill people inside... Like this fireball or like that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m-VgWwfh0c for petrol and this explosion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFFDLk1fXcU for gas The only explosion from a fuel tank is the fuel vapor who will ignite the rest of the fuel and create massive fireball So yeah i agree we want big fireball !!! With new explosion/smoke and fire effect too please...

DCS : TR3B Astra, its why we will have the Nevada for the Area 51 and for surprise the SR-71 and the U-2 will be added as flyable for FC3 But maybe we will see for DCS Flying Legend DCS: Fokker DR1

WW2 Plane are awesome and with The Fighter Collection we can have an expensive list of choice, but in a simulator like that i don't think that a WW2 plane can be really nice, maybe just for testing WW2 plane vs generation 3 or 4 fighter ^^ but that's all For me the best choice will be F/A-18E and F Super Hornet for the next aircraft and the F-14 Tomcat for the Flying Legend !! With carrier OP for both, or why not the Super Hornet and a old Russian plane like Mig-21 for people who want to pilot a Russian plane and not always a US and for BVR the MIG-21 have no advantage against modern plane but in dogfight the Mig-21 can be really dangerous :p Or maybe a French Mirage 3 for change a little, anyways we will see, i want to see WW2 plane yeah but i prefer see for DCS Vietnam/Cold war plane, if we see any WW2 aircraft we must see quickly after the rival, like BF-109 -> Spitfire, but same for old jet like Mig-21 -> F-14/Mirage 3

Don't forget that its maybe a woman in another aircraft, on the ground or like a lot of time in the control center the radio effect can look like a computer voice sometime, or maybe you have just watch a movie and every movie where exaggerated and show false things...

Half people want a cracked canopy and glass and half don't want... Simply idea... What about create a cracked canopy/glass and a simple option for disable it for people who don't want that ? Same thing for the yellow windshield missing ? Its better to have a big page with a lot of options and can personalize the simulator how we want than minimal options with no choice...

Ho okey sorry. But technically its not as the level of DCS but its still really nice (10 time better than X-Plane and 1000 time better than Flight Simulator) but its really advanced for weather cause its made over RC simulator and the precision that we need for made thermal wind and other complex weather who ca affect little weight aircraft require extremely realistic and advanced weather engine, technically the weather are better for AFFS than DCS but don't matter, its still nice for DCS too. @EtherealN & HiJack Yes i agree too its nice, but its only a screenshot, i wait to see the final product, but yes every screenshots are nice ! But that not correct the problem for the Georgia :/

@EtherealN Yes i understand, but when i look every video of Aerofly FS or FSX with TileProxy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-g2g3g1kN8 or good payware and other good color and realistic aspect like that or i just wonder see the same in DCS Ok i know for the Nevada i must wait to see how that will be, but actual Georgia color are not correct and that look not really good Look this picture from Georgia http://www.geo.fr/var/geo/storage/images/voyages/guides-de-voyage/asie/georgie/107276-28-fre-FR/georgie_940x705.jpg Its beautiful and i have never see color like that in DCS and that miss so bad :/ And after we can control the weather with HAARPS :D (just a joke, but technically we can) I agree we can't control the cloud when we take a satellite picture, but we can without any problem correct the area with cloud shadows or just take several HIRES texture from forest without cloud shadows and delete texture with shadow for replace it by texture without shadow... Simple example : http://www.clubaventure.fr/upload/georgie_01_cgtt.jpg We can't to 3D model for every rock but we can just put texture with rock that not will take more performance than texture with single grass and for good color the result will be just fantastic AND realist, same thing for vegetation and other things... And with the possibility to have good texture resolution at long range DCS just will look amazing. And i prefer have problem of cloud shadows on the ground but with correct color and extremely realistic texture than actual of Georgia with anyways totally unrealistic and false texture...

@Newt are you crazy ? How can you say that ? the scenery are perfect, or maybe you think than game graphic are better than real life ? xD Anyway we will see when the Nevada will coming, the the Georgia its FAR to be realistic for color, look everything you want in the sim and compare with any picture and sat image... With gray or brown grass its funny... in the rest of the world the grass are green, in Georgia that just look like color loss after wash... I hope the Nevada will be like (and even better) than what i see in screenshot and not less.. And about the Nevada, did we will have the Area 51 ? With aircraft like TR3A TR3B and other 30/40 year old prototype in parking ? :p

Its really nice but what about make photorealism texture ? Cause yeah the new terrain are really nice but an important aspect that we always forget its the color...The color of the texture are so many time (for every games) not really good, that always look plastic... I don't talk about make bigger texture or anything, i talk about texture with the SAME resolution (i insist here before everyone told my that its impossible) but based of real life photography... ? Look here : Aerofly one of the most advanced RC sim have do the same thing the real size aircraft (with one of the more complex and advanced wind/turbulence/thermal and other weather ever The texture of this new sim its at 100% in photorealism cause based on real photography... We have also great ground 3D object with good detail and the terrain its the full Swiss with really long visual range (i prevent if anyone will told me something about the distance...) I don't talk about the 3D (it look just really nice for Nevada) but about texture, we just need to take texture from google earth or if ED don't want from several photo, sand texture from sand picture, rock texture from rock picture and same thing for everything... Cause actually the rock model add new 3D object its nice but the texture are not really perfect that don't look like a rock matter... Please can you considerate that for Nevada ? And maybe one day for actual map too !

@Inseckt Yes but not, i talk about the fact that i have loose FPS long time before any new shadow implement, and i talk about close to loose half... And i prefer see correct hardware improvement like correctly exploiting CPU and not exploiting 100% of an HD 6970 (without crossfire cause that not take crossfire too...i don't will talk about it) for really bad graphic render and texture, the real change and FPS improvement i keep wait it... And for the 3D model if the problem its just the size that will really take less than 5 minutes, a good 3D software can just "stretch" the 3D object at one part, that take in really a little second to do that... I remember when i play with my old 3D software i have create giant space ship and just "stretch" an object its easy and fast... After the 3D object just correct the texture and its done... And if i can be sure that i can do the good dimensions i will have do it myself...