Jump to content

355th_Thomp

Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 355th_Thomp

  1. Im sorry but I have no idea how to model. But, it would sure be nice to see a T-72 modelled! -Thomp
  2. your gonna be using the same computer after 10 years? Yeah right. LMAO! It was posted here earlier that if you have proof of purchase, ED would in certain cases grant you additional installations.. or something to that affect. Now, Ruggbutt's questions is interesting, im hoping to hear on that one too! -Thomp ps. no offense :D
  3. Excellent news! Just forget the F-16 and concentrate on the F-18... pretty please? :D -Thomp ps. dont flame.. just a friendly gesture! :D
  4. There wont be a the ability to host but rather just one large server that is on 24/7. The concept of host will actually be changed to mission maker. The mission maker will upload the mission to the server, and then open it for whoever is flyin in that region to use. Everybody will be able to fly on the same massive server. So we might have thousands of people on the same server and map doing missions anywhere in the world. ..too futuristic?.. you just wait and see.. -thomp
  5. Spain, Kuwait, Switzerland, Malaysia, Thailand and last but definately not least Finland :D
  6. There are about a 1100 hits on the lockon.ru page right this second. Any guesses what that number will be at 20GMT? As a hint, there have been over 300 hits within the last hour. Post your best guess.. lets see who gets the closest! :D -Thomp
  7. 150pixels high means that the height of your sig must not be greater than 150pixels. Yours is currently 250 pixels. Please, see height and width in the dictionary! High does not mean the size as in kilobytes! -Thomp
  8. not that i have anything against big sig's.. but isint that pushing it a bit? I mean comon, its 500 x 336 pixels in size. Its not the width, but the height that makes it a bit large.. IMO -Thomp
  9. yup.. buying it.. -thomp
  10. Mr.Wolf, you just keep on amazing me. Fantastic work! And a big thanks!! -Thomp
  11. I'm innocent!! :mrgreen: my bad :rolleyes: -Thomp
  12. TIR 1 here too! :lol: Any inside information about when TIR4 is gonna be out?? Thats what im gonna be upgrading to.. so sooner the better... -Thomp
  13. BUMP! :drinkers: -Thomp
  14. I voted F/A-18, just for the fact, that I want the developers to seriously know that its an area of the sim that has been neglected and that if its not implemented in 1.2 then it must be a flyable in whatever comes after lockon. -Thomp
  15. And i have to say, those skins are absolutely beautiful!! Thanks again Mr.Wolf!! Great job!! -Thomp
  16. I agree 100% And for a dedicated A-10 pilot, these create more targets that we can hunt and go after! These systems arent only used by "rebels", some countries base their air defences on these AAA units. Take for instance Kosovo, they had plenty of AAA and some SAM's.. it was the A-10s that searched and destroyed these units. Imagine yourself sitting in the cockpit, cruising at 20k and looking below you, you see these black balls exploding 10k beneath you. Now thats immersion!! (and before anybody starts talking about fps, SHUSH!) -Thomp
  17. I agree with most of your points! Very valid! The navaids, such as a fully functional INS system for the Nato planes (which you have to reset and keep configured). But if some of you are thinking about VOR's etc, you wont find them in a warzone.. or if you do, can you trust them? But other than that, CDI needle etc stuff that works, and you can adjust would be superb. And again.. the Hornet.. who wouldn't want to see that in the sim.. <-- not a question but a rhetorical statement. Beautiful graphics, lets get the rest of the sim fixed too! -Thomp
  18. I have to agree here. Having a western multi-role fighter (F/A-18) would balance the sim and would definately bring a lot of new simmers into lockon. I would like to see the AFM incorporated into the other flyables in 1.2, it would only be fair and again balanced to have it in all the aircraft. Even though a helicopter sim is a cool idea, and should be pursued, I would like things first to be fixed, and AFM on all the existing flyables before any new flyables are added. -Thomp
  19. oh forget the demo, give me the real deal!! :prayer: :mrgreen: -Thomp
  20. you must be kidding Nomad. Definately not a good idea. You would alienate half of the community base. Just have a dedicated server ability in lomac, like Skarp suggested! -Thomp
  21. Absolutely fantastic read! WOW! Thanks for the link!! -Thomp
  22. Very nice!! Ive seen some Russian Circus folk do amazing stuff with those iron balls. But never sink a aircraft carrier :lol: -Thomp
  23. Absolutely, this would be a fantastic improvement to the game! The AWAC's would bring a whole new perspective to online gaming, you could seriously boast that this game offers something never before seen in any modern air combat sim! And, the Eagle definately needs a LANTIRN, it would allow for precision LGB strikes, and hence give it some real teeth in a AG capability. This would be a "cheap" way around the AG radar.. The Mavericks are absolutely a must. I certainly hope ED gives the western side a AG capable fighter, this solution would allow us to keep the current F-15 but just with "upgrades" that are found already in a Real Life setting. Thanks guys! -Thomp
×
×
  • Create New...