Tarres

I resolved the issue in this way: .-Open the mission in the ME. .-Select the payload. .-Remove both Fuel tanks. .- Add the LEFT wing tank. The "symmetrical function" will add the right tank automatically. .-The payload definition will be upgraded with the new values once you resave the mission. I hope that it will work for you.

Yes, I know the limitations about the DCS implementation. The list is more about "what the controls should be in the DCS M2000C". For example, separated ECM power on and ECM jammer on. Thanks PiedDroit.

Sorry for reopen the topic. The operation mode of the EW suite then would be: .- BR on: ECM system powered on. .- the VEI-square-PCM: ECM system running status, in our DCS-case; VEI: jammer powered on and in standby, square: operation (keybind E), PCM: not functional. .-DA: RWR power on/off/selftest; .-D2M: not functional in 2000C version; .-LL: Flare/chaff pods on/off; .-Rotary: A,1-10: auto or programmed chaff-flare sequences. Not functional in DCS. 11 positions and not the "discret positions" that we have for now. Is this correct? Thanks in advance.

Sorry for the thread bump. Any options to have the dismount sight checkbox moved from the special tab options as a common feature for the 39C/ZA to a specific checkbox for the 39C only in the special options tab of the 39C in the mission editor alongside the hood and the solo flight? Thanks for the best module!

For the TOW: Canada, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, Hungary, Germany, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Nethertlands, Norway, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey For the AT-7 Belarus, Ukraine, Hungary, Iran, Syria, Poland For the AT-14 Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey Thanks in advance Morkva.

Great mod! Any chance to add some other countries to the definition file of the units?

Thanks. I misunderstood "Eff" by "delete" and "all" by align in the hud controls.

Quick question about the HUD symbology. Is there any switch in the M2000C that allow to show the HUD symbology as "Fixed" to prevent the data "to drift" in crosswind scenarios? Maybe the "EFF" switch is for "declutter the HUD" and the "ALL" switch is for "To allign the HUD symbology"? Thanks in advance.

It seems that the Razbam team is using the new "symmetrical loadauts" functions that were released with the L-39 by ED.

I think that it´s WIP feature. Is there any switch or rotary, like in the Huey or the Hip, to select the radio to contact with a FAC (VHF FM) or ATC (UHF) or Flight Group (VHF AM) for example? Maybe it´s related with the Team Relay box, that it isn´t modeled at the moment? Thanks in advance.

I hope that the issue with the VOR navigation in the NTTR will be solved to allow a proper IFR (VOR+TACAN) for the F-5E-3 and for the Huey. For now the HUEY only has one NDB for IFR in the NTTR (and the great gospadin mod) and the VOR navigation is bugged. (Yes, it´s an alpha)

I think it´s the angle between the target and the own plane, or something similar.

I think that the HOTAS CCM switch is a 3 position switch: Magic-PCA(neutral)-Cannon

Maybe the team could add a 3rd position for the "Combat modes switch in the Hotas": Magic, Cannon and "return to selected PCA".

Yes, correct.

The F-5E doesn´t have an INS, but it has an ILS.

Yes, works in UR and with the other radio plugins aswell. The advantage with a definition in the clicabledata.lua is that you can export the value directly, so for example, in the UR you don't need to create shortcuts to activate radios.... well only for the FC3 of course. If you press and hold the VUHF radio button for example, the variable is captured and readed by the plugin, so you've got a working PTT directly in your HOTAS without having to setup a external configuration for the UR. But as I said, it's a long term wish. Sorry for my English.

Great development. Can´t wait for the INU/INS and, in the long term, the AG mode for the RDI radar. In the long run, after the radar and INS, it could be great to have an animated HOTAS with clicable switches and buttons like in the L-39, F-86 and others. Great for export variables in order to make custom cockpits. Thanks for your job.

Yes. EFM is the acronym for EXTERNAL Flight Model. It´s up to the 3rd party the level of accuracy of their EFM. There is nothing that stops a 3rd party EFM to have the same level of accuracy that the PFM of ED/BST, only resources and program capabilities of their programmers.

Yes, you are right. My mistake.

ATC gives barometric information in Imperial, that is inconsistent with the instrument in metric that we have. To have information in metric, there must be a line in sounds/speech/speech.lua that defines this information: aircraftNativeCountry = { ..... ..... ['M-2000C'] = base.country.id.RUSSIA, } Maybe it can be done with another tweak, but this is a workaround for the moment. Regards.

Rocker+PTT, I suspect something like this. With the redone of the throttle in the medium-long term maybe Razbam could make the buttons and rockers of the new throttle clicables like in the L-39, Huey, Mi-8, MiG-21, Sabre and others. Thanks again.

Thanks EXO7.

Thanks Azrayen. This is exactly what I think, a "spare ampli" not related with the Radios themselves. Maybe as you say "with limitations". Regards. Tarres

I have a little question about the communications. In the throttle there are a button for transmit via V/UHF (main) and another for the UHF (AUX), ok... but in the left console there is an "Amplis selector 1/2" that in the Razbam manual is marked as a "COMM selector". The Hotas buttons take priority over the "Amplis"? Have you to select via the "Amplis" to use (hear and talk) the V/UHF or the UHF? I´ve searched across the posts but I haven´t found anything that solves this question. Sorry for my English and thanks in advance. Regards. Tarres