Tarres

The MRP-56 marker beacon system it is not modeled according to the developers. https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.com/m/issue_page.php?id=63

Flight operations and technical manuals states that interceptions below 1500 meters have to be performed in visual only conditions without radar help. Like Keule said, the RP-22SMA it's not designed to low level interceptions. Bellow 3-2000 meters its capabilities are degraded and bellow 1500-1000 meters are inexistents.

Yes, a pair of books about the development of the 25 series, from Aerofax and Midland publishing and a pair of books from Osprey publising. I will post their ISBN references later. Maybe it could be better the TM variant, only prototypes from a 25T prototype conversion, to have "almost" the capabilities that the 25T has now in the sim. Unfortunately the SM is too new, even when it' s only a modest upgrade. Edit: references. Aerofax and Midland Publishing: Su-25 the Soviet Union Tank Buster. Osprey Publishing: Air Vanguard Su-25 Frogfoot and Combat Aircraft Su-25 Frogfoot in action. Obviously the Ed team has a wide catalog of references and I could be wrong.

I prefer a 25A over that a 25T but if the 25T is modeled without "licenses", that is for example modeled without SEAD, with the real and limited WCS and so on, yes It could be an interesting module. Are you sure that you want a full fidelity SU-25T with all the real limitations? It' s a joke... It could be a great module or modules.

UTM CETKA, I think that is the UTM grid and maybe the MGRS? grid.

822 is the NDB freq, 820 is the RSBN frequency.

Maybe a bug. Radio presets in the R-832M seems to be different between Front and rear cockpits. In instant action, cold start (L-39C), export data indicates that the front cockpit has 305Mhz frequency in channel 0 and in the rear cockpit, exported data indicates 118Mhz in channel 0. Both cockpits must be have the same presets, maybe its related with the updated that the L-39 receive 2 patches ago when the R-832 was updated with VHF and UHF frequencies. Thanks in advance.

If it's closed I can't request an explication or what are your documents to give this answer. Ok. You can launch but your missile will act as a rocket, now it acts like a AIM-9X or a R-73M. So, what's the point to have a R-13M or a R-13M1 or a R-60 (graphically apart) if you don't have to cope with their limitations? On the other hand the bombs departs from the hardpoints at excess of xG, BUT MAGICALLY your APU launchers and associated systems can cope with parameters that excess their limits. And your answer that the RS-2US saw a wide service and we don't need a safety trigger or the new radio instead of one thing that your team had simulated ok, the R-802 with the only bug being a typo (now we have a R-832 V/UHF set) or thanks to LN you don't need to cope with the limitations of a 60's nav-system (magically you've got an overmodeleded system with plenty of WP) but we don't have the possibility to use the manual mode of the RSBN that would allow us to navigate in every map without cope with Lua files, and yes I know that this mode it isn't very precise. ...well I hope that your next project will be better due to the fact that will be done from scratch and not based on an ancient FC mod with the limitations that it had. I'm too old for this kind of answers Mr Dackard. Have a nice weekend. Yours sincerely, Miquel Serrat Ripoll

And the flight manual of the MiG-21bis and the technical manuals states that 2G/1.3G on high altitude, were the limits for the launch for the R-3S and 3.7g the limits of the R-13M. Same missile, same APU launchers.

In the LN-21, the R-3S can be fired in excess of their real limit of 2G, correctly modeled in the L-39C/ZA. Same applies for the R-3R (Oficial manuals and technical manuals) R-13M had a limit of 3.7G according to manuals and museums. You can fire it outside of this envelope safely in the sim. R-13M was like a AIM-9G more or less. The R-55, that shares the same seeker form the R-3S, and the RS-2US (apart for be incompatible with a RP-22SM radar set and being 50´s tech) are... well... non coment... In the L-39C/ZA the R-3S acts like a GAR-8, try to fire it outside the limits and the system doesn´t let you to fire the missile, or try to get a lock with the sun in front of you...

I wonder if it could be possible to a add a new column with a simple "added to x.x.x version" once the request has been published in a patch.

The voices in the training missions of the L-39C are recorded in russian. Texts are in English. Maybe a conflict in the i10 folder of the .miz archives? Thanks in advance.

The USAF E-3 block was designed for WVR training, so it´s not surprising. Maybe the export Tiger II had an IFF system as a customer requeriment.

Ok. Thanks Cofcorpse.

No AN/APX-72 or 101? I though that was a standard equipment. Source: F-5E Flight manual, section 1, page 94-95 (T.O.F-5E1 1978 )

Yes you are right. Maybe some implementation bug. Is the Huey VOR system working in the NTTR map with the last update? About the RSBN in the Caucasus, these are the RSBN stations (only RSBN, not PRMG) in the Caucasus area before the breakup of the USSR (from FSX/Xplane soviet aviation data, but it´s the most accurate that I have found) Format: LAT/LONG/Morse code/Channel Anapa: 44º59.9/37º20.3/AB/36 Sochi: 43º24.1/39º56.9/RC/23 Min-Vody: 44º13.5/43º05.6/7NR/33 Sukhumi: 42º52.0/41º07.0/AV/24 Batumi: 41º36/41º35/not available/04 Kutaisi: 42º11.0/42º28.0/UY/21 Tbilisi: 41º40/44º57/RF/26 After the breakup, a lot of RSBN were closed and changed for western systems (VOR) to allow navigation for the newer western planes that the new airlines bought, and for political and cots reasons. RSBN are now basically a military system, this is the reason that we only have RSBN stations in Russian AFB in the Caucasus map, circa 2008. As you said, I hope that in the medium/long term we will be able to select "time frames" for the map navigation aids.

Maybe the Y channels are tied/reserved for Airborne or Naval TACANs in DCS? About the VOR/DME, there is no airplane that uses the VOR/DME system, maybe it´s related to this.

Great work Gospadin! Have you received the link that I sent you? Ramsay, RSBN is for civil and military air navigation. PRMG is only for military use. Until the breakup of the USSR, there was RSBN stations at Batumi, Tbilisi and other airfields.. I have sent the data to Gospadin.

The Nevada/NTTR map.

Great mod Gospadin. PM sent.

The ARK-22 frequencies are now editable in the ME (1.5.2)

Mission Planner or mission editor. I think that L-39 Quick missions in the NTTR will be updated.

R-832M ranges are: VHF: 118-140 and UHF:220-389.95 No problems here in the Caucasus or in the NTTR.

Reported in the bugtracker. https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.com/m/issue_page.php?id=35 It seems that it is not possible to fix it. They recommend lower the graphical settings

Beautiful evening landing...