Jump to content

112th_Rossi

Members
  • Posts

    1389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by 112th_Rossi

  1. It would be awesome if CA is updated to include carrier flight officer operations :D
  2. EDGE Eternally Delayed Game Engine :D
  3. I think that some Intel based server boards have special hardware that allows access above 2gb for applications. Physical Address Extensions I believe. Anyway 32bit was yesterday.
  4. It has gyroscopic and accelerometer sensitivity so should be able to implement 6DOF
  5. And not before time too.
  6. Not true. SDK kits are being shipped in May to developers and the retail is down for this year or early next. It's extremely promising and I can't see why DCS can't be adapted to accomodate it. If OC follows a standard input model it should be fairly easy to integrate.
  7. Hmm cross wind landings without rudders would be a bit of a challenge.
  8. So does the TM Warthog not have a twist for the rudder operation?
  9. I guess then that hidrag bombs are also broken I'm sure I saw a video detailing how to tell the CDU to account for wind.
  10. You can program the CDU to account for wind correction.
  11. We just have to wait. And wait. And wait. And wa...
  12. If that fails, try selecting opposite pylons before you program the profile. It's one or the other. Because I think if you select one only it tells the computer to drop two from that pylon only. Selecting two opposite pylons should result in an even drop. afaik
  13. Make sure you have two opposite pylons selected in the DSMS.
  14. Yes most modern fighters have auto-trim. A10 doesn't though.
  15. This would make some interesting scenarios in multiplayer. Especially in PvP
  16. It should be noted that the jammer in this game isn't modelled at all afaik.
  17. It seems strange that an aircraft will carry a combination of A/G and A/A ordnance in the same proportions. Surely if you're engaged in A/A all that A/G is dead weight. That would be an expensive jettison.
  18. It makes me wonder if these arms developers think we are still in the cold war era. Why would you need a F-15 that can carry that kind of ordnance?
  19. It's never as simple as 1.2.3
  20. The localization team are having issues with their spell checker so the patch will be delayed for another week!
  21. I'm not too worried if radar implementation is not 100% real, so long as it suspends disbelief
  22. nevermind
  23. You've not been to many forums have you? Try the Battlelog forums or Steampowered.
  24. Makes sense to stabilize the netcode before moving it over to a dedicated app.
  25. What can go wrong, will go wrong. Nothing is more true in software development :(
×
×
  • Create New...