Mizzy
-
Posts
1747 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mizzy
-
Exactly, it is not an official announcement from Zambrano (Razbam) about anything to do with this dispute. Move along Citizens, nothing to see here officially ! Mizzy Indeed Nothing official, so no. Miz
-
In your opinion
-
It's already been stated in the first post what will happen to the Razbam modules regardless of outcome. It only affects the F15E, or rather, it affects the F15E much more that the others because bugger all was being done with them before the dispute. Hope this helps. Miz
-
Yes, but not anything to do with Razbam. I personally feel Razbam are well and truly out of the equation for developing anything again in DCS and the hope for a good outcome is Razbam leave DCS on good terms, whatever that may entail. Mizzy
-
Unfortunately wounds that have been left to infest don't heal. In this case, amputation is the healer. Agreed Also agreed Agreed Your post has merit You have repeated this many times, we get the message. I would like the Mig 23 but not by Razbam and I am not alone.
-
So is it Razbam that are holding things up ?
-
"They are totally different era anyway so not comparable". Galinette I agree with him, you can't, even on a simulation basis unless the F15E has the same radar as say the F18 or 16. To say one radar is more accurate has to be from the same starting point and that is what I am meaning. Agree to disagree eh ! Mizzy Ahh, that's nice.
-
And you picked up on my point, I didn't hide it very well ! You can't compare radar's in DCS and it is ridiculous to do so, tell your friend Timghetta that, he doesn't seem to comprehend this point. I must clarify a point made by Timgetta: "it was Razbam who coded the cockpit, with one of the best radars in game. Far more accurate than other aircraft inside DCS." it's more of a point of 'I like my radar better than yours' and disrespectful to other 3rd Party developers who's radars may well be far more accurate than the one mentioned. Anyway, it's OT and I have asked for the offending post to be removed as being subjective, offensive and Off Topic. Mizzy just checking if it was the same person
-
I do apologise, it was the word 'within' I missed the 'in' bit, not to worry it's not important. As to attributing development credit, looks like Razbam got all the credit for your work from your friend Timghetta (Razbam being the trade name for Zambrano) and not you. I personally would be very upset about that. Timghetta said: "it was Razbam who coded the cockpit, with one of the best radars in game. Far more accurate than other aircraft inside DCS." Is he saying you didn't ? I'm confused. I can't comment as I don't have the F15e module, is it better than the F-5, my favourite? Anyway, we are getting off topic. Mizzy Agreed
-
No, it's my fault, when I use the term 'Razbam' it means 'Zambrano' and Zambrano doesn't do anything other than publish the product and I don't really care who did what as it's muddied the waters yet again. I didn't ask you the question but I will respond to your last comment. From the first post: "It is our commitment that no matter what happens we will do our best to make sure these continue to work into the future. We understand those of you who remember losing the Hawk, this is not something we intend to do again." You are getting confused with Razbam (Zambrano) continuing to update and internally fix his published modules out of early access (which he wasn't doing anyway) that's your point and EDs commitment to fix any issues that break the module in DCS, my point, they are two very different entities. In other words, ED will keep the module working in DCS (all 4 of them, the SA map has nothing to do with Razbam) for as long as they can in the state they were left in after early access. This is my point when people say they will lose all 4 modules, they won't and if people would care to read the first post, they would not be asking the question. Tavo89 "Clearly the legal dispute doesn't let you see beyond that, take some time to investigate about the projects that were planned, they are much more than a simple Mig-19. And about badmouthing RB people leave it to yourself, it doesn't help." I am not interested in what would have been or what was planned, Zambrano planned a lot of things that never materialised and not just for this sim ! As for 'badmouthing' Razbam, go over to his Discord and see what they say about ED, utterly disgraceful and it certainly has not helped Zambrano for allowing such behaviour on his official Discord. Mizzy
-
Who is "we" ?
-
Please explain what you mean by the word "with" ? I don't mean to be rude but who are you ? Mizzy Which individual or team are you referring to? Are you saying Zambrano coded the Radar and cockpit? Mizzy
-
I do apologies, I forgot about the AdA update. It isn't directly related to my point because this update was to a Razbam module that was considered feature complete but benefited from AdAs development and not Razbam. Thanks Mizzy
-
When did I say all modules out of early access are considered feature complete? Read what I actually said and not what you think I said. This is what I said: "F15-E because it's the only Razbam module still in Early Access, all the others were out of Early Access and considered feature complete with no further features/updates to be added except for fixes to those modules." Notice I was referring to Razbam and did you spot the word "considered"? This is how misinformation spreads by someone who doesn't read posts correctly and then makes up the sentence halfway through and then decides to use the F18 as an example ! Kind regards Miz
-
Yes, I know you were just correcting misinformation. However, I have had this idea for some time, I envisage older modules going into legacy versions of DCS so people can still play them if they chose. I play Flanker 2.0 and Janes USAF from time to time just for nostalgic reasons and I am sure some modules will not be viable to continue with as DCS evolves beyond the modules life cycle. It may well be that DCS 4 won't carry all modules forward into the new gen spec but DCS 3 will remain open for older modules. Just a thought as I had some time on my hands this evening. Mizzy
-
Love it Miz
-
It has been explained countless times about Razbam modules, the only module that is affected and due updates was the F15-E because it's the only Razbam module still in Early Access, all the others were out of Early Access and considered feature complete with no further features/updates to be added except for fixes to those modules. So you are not losing anything as it stands. This is all explained in the opening post of this thread. As for what could have been in the future with Razbam, I'm afraid this is a typical ploy to smoke screen the legal dispute, usually by the losing side for obvious reasons. The Mig19S is a good example of promises not being kept by zambrano and using his cohorts to spread smoke screening stories. Mizzy
-
I'm coming up 60 but I still think like I'm 20 LOL. Lovely post of yours. Mizzy
-
Yep, it's clear to me ! Mizzy
-
Sorry Guy's, I should have said the Hurricane is an airframe that is loved by many and we (me) can imagine things that are not historically authentic, it's not important to us, we just play for fun. But I see peoples point and appreciate it. Mizzy
-
I have wondered for years why DCS doesn't have a Hurricane either FF or AI ! Anyone care to comment why? Mizzy
-
'If' I believe is the operative in this dispute. Mizzy
-
Gosh, I'm slightly flattered you have taken all that time to read my posts and you presumed I had nothing else to do Anyway, my screenshot example of Razbam's discord is, zambrano clearly does not care what people post despite being in litigation with ED, that is very unprofessional. Stop making up your own interpretations of what I post, it's rude to say the least. I think it's best we ignore each other now, you have had your go at me with somewhat derogatory intent, but I am sure you have other things to do now, but I wouldn't like to bet on it ! Best wishes Mizzy
