Pappen

There is nothing supporting that windows 11 should support DDR5 better than windows 10. @72Stu where did you get that information from?

The improvements are with mobile processor and graphics

I tested @4K

On a flat screen with settings from OP, Powercolor Radeon RX 6900 XT RED DEVIL 16GB@stock Avrage: 69 Min: 48 Max: 87

I have the exact same picture as Fury_007 with HP Reverb G2 and since this is label correct as-is must be a problem with my setup. Can any of you share how you solved the problem?

Vulkan is not based on OpenGL it's based on Mantel...

Vulkan is based on Mantel not OpenGL

I'm running 3900x on an Asus Crosshair VII Hero. Loading up bios default givs me 4525 ghz but with as tight timings on the memory as I can get it only boost to 4275ghz (2x16 GB dual rank memory @1900/3800, BIOS 2701 AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABB)

It fluctuates a bit...

Have no idea what you mean. Tested with Presentmon64 and used the ingame counter...

Not by any stretch of the imagination, a scientific test just a quick one and I don't know if it's even stable at this moment... Tested instant action with F-18 Nevada map Ready on Ramp without doing anything. 2700x 124 FPS 3600 165 FPS System: Asus C7H (X470) Old Proc. 2700x mem. speed @3200 CL14 New Proc. 3600 mem. speed @3600 CL14

I have not seen any 5 GHz Ryzen 3000 other then on LN2. Do you have a link? If the 3900X is on par with the 9900K, wouldn't the 3950X be even faster with it clocking 100MHz more?

Why you compare 9900K to the 3950X is beyond me, the 3900X is according to AMD on par with the 9900K and is roughly the same performance and price... of course as you point out wait for independent reviews. 5GHz Intel is not the same as 5GHz AMD

My guess is that you need to change to code to render the updated maps...

As far as I'm aware ASW has nothing to do with improving FPS...

As far as I'm a where Raid0 and Raid1 works the same while reading... It's when writing it's different

If you don't mind waiting a bit, this rumor could be interesting. Maybe saving some money...

Latency... If I can remember correct the lower the resolution the more important is latency, the higher the resolution the more come speed/bandwidth in to play

Tried instant mission F/A-18 9X mission to try out the new HMD. Ended the mission and pressed fly again and the view was totally screwed. Any one else have this experience?

He specifically states that they are with the Rift. See below from his #111 post. What I'm I missing? In VR Settings, I set Pixel Density (PD) to 1.5 And with two runs on each card using the Oculus Rift, here is what I got (averaged with FRAPS): 1080 – 53.9 FPS – Averaged 5.2% CPU usage 1080 Ti – 72.1 FPS – Average 5.3% CPU usage 2080 Ti – 91.3 FPS – Averaged 5% CPU usage

Since he specifically ask between 1080ti and 2080 I would agree with the 1080ti...

If you have ASW on witch I think is on by default you get 0-45 and then 90. You have to disable ASW to get anything between 45-90.

How do you get to 50%? I get 36% on his #105 post and 27% in #111

Since you need an RTX I doubt they implement it as, if I recall correct, they have stated that they wont implement for a specific vendor/brand, but that's just my 2 cent...