YoYo

I know, Wags said something in the last Q&A that something will be shown, so we wait patiently .

Right! +1. Noticed the same . btw. I hope we will know something in the next newsletters about progress of Dynamic Campaign. The topic has quieted down a bit and there has been nothing for a while.

And that's interesting :). However, with such a small MFD frame (it's not an F-15E) in 16th at lower resolutions the image may still seem quite sharp for eye's human. I wouldn't go for any downgrade here.

Thx for the update but .... "Spotting dot rendering is being reworked" - just promise me the BIG DOT BOX won't come back in VR. What we have now works very well for the auto option in VR. I hope it's some other fix.

Good question, however I think yes.

AN/AAQ-28 LITENING G4: Thermal Imaging Camera (FLIR): Resolution: 640×512 pixels (average for the G4 version) In newer versions (LITENING NEXT GEN): 1280×1024 pixels (HD) CCD Camera (Daylight/Visible): Resolution: Typically High Definition (HD), meaning at least 1280×720 or 1920×1080 (Full HD) in newer versions. AN/AAQ-33 Sniper: Sniper XR / ATP-SE FLIR: Resolution: 640×512 pixels Sniper Advanced (Gen 3): Estimated: 1280×1024 pixels, similar to the competing LITENING Next Gen. CCD TV camera: HD 1280×720 (most common in older and base versions) Possible: 1920×1080 (Full HD) in newer and export versions of Sniper SE That's right, and in my opinion, the image shouldn't have such blur in the basic mode. I know of a pilot who told me he could read the headline of a newspaper read by a human, but in the videos presented, it's likely even difficult to see a human because the image is blurry. As you can also see above, the resolution of the matrices is similar, I would not suggest downgrading Lightning now, because we will again deviate from reality. Sniper's advantage is the quality of its zoom and software (multitargeting, PiP etc); as you can see, the resolution itself is quite similar. It's also worth remembering that the image in the cockpit is meant to simulate reality, but we're sitting in a digital cockpit generated by DCS, which is a distinct disadvantage compared to the real thing and significantly reduces visibility. Let's not go down that route. Lightning image reception is okay, and the image from the Sniper pod should be just as good, but now someone here is trying to make things a bit more complicated. This creates a blurry effect (no focus, like in cameras). Please take a closer look. Thank you. Do you see the quality of the moon? This video is not a good example and should not be relied on - it is stretched, was recorded 11 years ago, and has probably been edited to a lower quality. Other Sniper's examples: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/mfc/pc/sniper-pod/mfc-sniper-atp-pc-01.pdf https://www.military.com/video/4321763059001

Even, kind of "Petrovitch" menu:

Nice! I very like this idea . Just remember about this gear issue (still not solved).

It looks really good! Btw. What's the current status of the 3D model outside? Generally, there's little external screenshots/videos on this topic.

Did you watch both videos? That was just an example. Here you have TV mode at 14, plus there's a TV shot at 1.4 miles that's also blurry. It looks like the Focus is off. As I know: Shown CCD resolution for Sniper: HD 1280×720 (most common in older and base versions) Possible: 1920×1080 (Full HD) in newer and export versions of Sniper SE Nice found!

By the way, because it's been bothering me and probably has some justification – why is the image itself so blurry in the basic modes? Even compared to Lightning, it's like a step backwards; only PiP starts to look better (whether it's the optics or the digital processing). What's going on here?

In other situations, the AI acts as a separate group, then the behavior is much better than the direct wingman (btw. it would be useful if ED improved the behavior of flight/wingman someday, because it is still the Achilles heel of DCS).

Nice work!

Can they be destroyed now? I tried once (long time ago) and they didn't seem to react to hits.

It's better to be in career mode, though, because some elements are introduced gradually, although of course, it's your choice :).

A MiG-27 would also be a great choice. Generally, I really enjoy all A2G missions (SP/MP) at DCS, so honestly, instead of a MiG-23 and MiG-29, I'd rather have the FF Su-24 and Su-25. Maybe someday, who knows .

Wow! Cool stuff, thanks!(Will there be a little more?) This is your wingman, characters essential to the plot cannot die. Unfortunately, the AI can pull off surprises, although I've never experienced one or another AI crashing during this campaign. Bad luck.

Link?

Hello!

There is no such topic yet?

Looks like solved:

ED working on it… however now it’s present in DCS (with many bugs so pity). Not good idea :), be hardcore!

Not very soon, not exactly 2 weeks, but it will definitely go by quickly !

It's hard to say. Generally, try again; nothing like that happens. The exception could be a wrong installation (which I doubt if you followed the manual). Alternatively, if you were just trying to check mission 2, you might have pressed "End mission" instead of "Cancel," thus overwriting the state. Even in that case, the campaign doesn't end, but the mission itself does, and the "Skip" (mission) option appears, and the mission itself is considered failed.

Finally! Great info! This month?