Anatoli-Kagari9

I honestly find DCS's simulation of torque & slipstream effects unique among all simulations I have tried so far in a desktop. Only problem for me with the recent introduction of wake turbulence is that my rig can't run it properly - FPS drop from 60s to 10s or even single digit :-/

@pmiceli, although this thread is under Yak-52, you brought the P-51, and the only comparison I have is what I was able to test in: - FSX / P3D using the A2A models; - A well known model for X-Plane; - IL-2 Great Battles - War Thunder In none of the above I notice that much torque effect under the circumstances you describe as I do in DCS TF51 and P51D. Same regarding the almost constant need to readjust aileron and rudder as well as pitch trim for any power / airspeed change. If you can point me to a better modeled P51d among the available desktop flight simulation games please do.

Would welcome the initiative... Buy back my preferred modules ;-) Consider it ED ... Others are doing it ...

No problems with Windows Defender either.

Yep, confirmed here too... Beware not to smash your head against the canopy as you look sideways and back - it is probably a lot more sensible now with the "new damage model" they're working on and we break it and that's why :-)

Any word from ED on "WorldGeneral.dll" quirks ? I've been int a miriad of threads reporting AV alerts due to some "strangeware" included in the update. Was renitent to install it, but just did it, and got any alerts from my default Win 10 AV. Anyway, I'm worried about the reports and I think someone from ED should really explain what is happening here ? Why is this supposedly "false-positive" being reported by so many users with different AV programs ?

I never understand why I even install comabt flightsims when I don't like air combat, and I don't have the time to play it.... OTOH, the fact that these sims, specially DCS and another competitor, have long offered flight dynamics that can go well beyond what I can get out of civil flightsim platforms, other than a professional one I use and never uninstalled :-) makes me return, from time to time, re-install, play again for a while. They have huge footprints on my small SSD's and faint / old desktop, so, space for other projects often requires that I wipe my disks... And yes, I know there are cheaper disks these days :-) Now looking fwd for MFS - let's see what it can bring...

:thumbup: I confess I didn't see your Edit. Ok, interesting. It's been a long time since I uninstalled DCS, so I really don't recall how it was in the 190D vs 109K4. This video the other day put me thinking about that again.

@Art-J : good point! @grafspee : you're comparing and aerobatic airplane with the 109 K-4.... For sure nothing similar in terms of MoI...

Exactly my point too - he returns the stick to the trimmed neutral ( ailerons ), and not further opposite. It's indeed a very fast return, and I doubt it could be done so fast IRL, but still, the 109 is not an Extra :-)

Even so... if IRL the stick was suddenly returned to neutral liek he is doing, would the aircraft respond with no inertia?

A recent video in youtube, not mine, that I link bellow, shows a user doing sudden inputs to the stick of the 109 K-4, and returning it to neutral. I know it's probably something that would be difficult to reproduce IRL, but still, the sudden stop in roll whenever the stick is brought to neutral appears to me as having almost no sense of inertia - the aircraft instantly stops rolling... Any ideas? Real numbers?

At Nellis watch the Temp and it's at 1869.1 ft. / 570 m (estimated), so, in Caucasus, with lower temps and close to mean sea level, there's more density to help the rudder come alive...

The author of the video suggests overdone gyroscopic effect in DCS because, as he describes, there's a tendency to swing right when tailwheel is raised, yet gyroscopic effect in this case - CW rotating prop - should actually account for a "portwise swing" of the nose...

I noticed that since my TIR broke and I started using ED Tracker there is no such stuttering / lag as there was before with TIR. Of course ED Tracker is not a TIR 5, but heck, it's good, and I have an old i5 2500, so, what could I expect ?

And cloud types too! Would be great if turbulence effects could also be modeled associated with the convective ones... Localized rain is also good, although it was already possible when using advanced ( High and Low areas dynamic ) weather ?

It's been fixed internally already - I guess it'll be in the next 190 A-8 patch.

Yep, from what I recall of the Dora, it did gain more stiffeness.

I noticed during my trials with this recently bought module that even when diving at top speeds and just before starting to lose control surfaces, the A-8 is still very responsive in roll. I don't have feedback references for the real world behaviour, so, any comments really appreciated!

Roger that - wake is OFF here... Will probably give this a go, but that means I will have to buy, again, the K-4... the ww2 module I like the less in DCS World WW2.

I never bought any campaign for DCS - well, actually not true because I have uninstalled DCS a twice and killed my users... and in one of them, the original "jcomm" associated with this Forum account I did by a Spitfire Campaign, which I never actually played because it used to put my old rig to the low 10 fps... But when I recently installed DCS again, and bought in the current promotional sale teh A-8 and again the Spitfire ( my only WW2 modules now - but I did have them all before... ) I found that running the default missions with lot's of aircraft including bombers around didn't have that much of a nasty effect on my fps ? Wonder if this 109 campaign is smooth too ?

Yep !!! Been told so by a major developer ;-) :thumbup: DCS Rulezzzzzz !!!! P.S.: Dreaming of that P47 bbrz !!!!!!

One thing I once found was that apparently there's a relationship between this failure and the fact that the canopy is not oppened when you issue the command to the ground crew. Most of the time it failled I had prematurely closed the canopy. Not absolutely sure this is the culprit though...

Been told it's fixed internally. Will probably make it's way to beta on the next update ( ? ) Anway - it's fixed - we now just have to wait a little while longer... We can pretend we're flying an aircraft with a malfunction, requiring non-normal procedures.

Hey! Yo-Yo !!!! Please fix this!