LostOblivion

Does anyone have any info regarding Thrustmaster or others making another replica stick for the next title?

So, ED, what is next? Another patch for DCS, or the Nevada map? :)

Seeing how big the improvement was in every aspect from DCSBS to DCSW, I can only imagine an even bigger improvement for the next module, seeing as how ED has probably received a lot of new customers after the release of wh.

Indeed, ED has done a very good job there.

Once at AO IP you should contact the JTAC using the "4"-menu, and report flight is on station ready for tasking. They will give you the strike mission and details regarding.

Are there any legacy aircraft that land on legacy carriers during airshows, etc, these days? I cannot really see the immersion of landing a WW2 carrier airframe on a Nimitz. Also: The poll should really not have been extended with more options, as new users will now believe most people here would like to see an F-14 over an F/A-18, which is obviously wrong.

Does my post seem biased towards HTTP? I did not mean to, in fact I use torrent as well.

Today, whether you decide using HTTP or FTP does not matter at all when it comes to transferring big files, as they are both directly limited to the TCP/IP-implementation on modern operating systems. Having said that, FTP is an obsolete protocol, which is being phased out slowly in favour of mostly HTTP, as well as hugely the torrent protocol for end point users. HTTP also supports native compression agreements between client and server, which leads to less bandwidth usage, but is rarely used afaik. FTP is mostly used today for server file maintenance.

Could you please remove the comments from the poll options, they do not belong in a poll. Thanks.

In my opinion, selections that are not cyclic, should not be cyclic. The master arm switch f.ex., I think if you press right mouse button when it is in the arm position, it should not cycle back to training position, but remain there.

The first issue has to do wth HDR and depends on how ED implemented it. Some implementations of HDR are very real, some are not, and tbh I have no idea where ED is at. Delayed sound from guns is realistic and is not an issue. Sound travels at roughly 300 m/s and explains why you hear bullets impacting after you see your rounds hit their target.

New explosions seem to disappear a bit too fast. A little better perf tho. :) Also, the wingman rejoin message is deffo not fixed.

Is there a more realistic poll on what aircraft people would like to see next in this forum? I mean, the F-16 is not even on the list. :)

I cannot answer your questions, but in terms of performance, I have a feeling that making few big groups is better than making many small groups. So for units that are fairly close together that does not move, I put them all in one group. For example. In my Taking Krymsk mission, the entirety of the FOB at Point Impact was one big group containing all the units, infantry, tanks, BMPs, artillery, everything.

I would be most pleased if they made the hornet, but only if they made a revolutionary carrier ops simulation that has been made so far. It is a versatile attack fighter giving it endless possibilities in terms of things to do for the player. SEAD, CAP, CAS, strike missions, you name it. And it does not even have to be all carrier based, the F-18 is used as an all-land fighter as well. The swiss are using it, and seeing as how the switz navy is kinda..uh..small? I do not see the problem with it primarily being a carrier based aircraft. Cheers.

I honestly doubt it is as big as the caucasus map, which AFAIk has been in development for over ten years?

Signed.

Thanks for the info, it is a good read.

Do you have a link? Sounds interesting. On the topic. Although it makes sense for us players to want proper SEAD armament on the hog, this is only because we only currently have the hog to play with in DCS. This limitation is not there IRL and it does not make any sense at all to fit HARM functionality into a hog.

Escalating expectations is not a good thing. But we are all buying their next product anyhow are we not... ;-)

Massive and massive...how often do we fly in rainy conditions after all. :P

I think they removed the radio option. Pitty.

Indeed, with the upcoming products they ought to make a Mission Editor Forum, since they will presumably all have the same ME.

Not many of us fly with FF.